collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Are wave machines legal?  (Read 43962 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10670
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #105 on: November 15, 2014, 09:47:33 PM »
Looks like Bigtex was correct  :chuckle:  :rockin:

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #106 on: November 16, 2014, 05:15:15 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10670
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #107 on: November 16, 2014, 08:07:10 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
Until WDFW changes the WAC to say that a decoy is a plastic object that looks like a bird they will remain illegal.

Offline aaronoto

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 444
  • Location: NW WA
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #108 on: November 16, 2014, 08:12:25 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.

Yep, it's the courts job to interpret the law.  Now in a case like this a specific instance might need to go to court for a precedence to be set as to how the law is legally interpreted and therefore should be enforced.  I wouldn't want it to be me...

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Lion Down - the Savor of Success by Rigby416
[Today at 12:17:56 AM]


Swakane by redi
[Yesterday at 11:27:02 PM]


MOA or MRAD, & Why? by Magnum_Willys
[Yesterday at 09:57:59 PM]


Pics from this year 2025 by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:36:06 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by jstone
[Yesterday at 09:14:54 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 08:12:33 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 07:38:11 PM]


Trap Check Time by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 07:33:16 PM]


Dodge 48re transmission recommendations by 92xj
[Yesterday at 06:19:32 PM]


Crazy looking Deer by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 06:10:52 PM]


"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex? by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 05:31:47 PM]


In the background by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 03:49:49 PM]


Leopard Cur Pups by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 11:05:27 AM]


Smelt ? by Trapper John
[Yesterday at 10:41:03 AM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 10:26:27 AM]


Jim Horn's elk calling, instructional audio CD's. by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 10:06:23 AM]


Long Range Steel Choke by Elmer Fletch
[Yesterday at 06:10:11 AM]


West side antler buyers by addicted1
[December 12, 2025, 10:19:05 PM]


Is it a conflict of interest by bbarnes
[December 12, 2025, 08:54:11 PM]


Shotgun Sight help by hughjorgan
[December 12, 2025, 08:38:11 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal