collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Are wave machines legal?  (Read 42330 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10626
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #105 on: November 15, 2014, 09:47:33 PM »
Looks like Bigtex was correct  :chuckle:  :rockin:

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #106 on: November 16, 2014, 05:15:15 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10626
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #107 on: November 16, 2014, 08:07:10 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
Until WDFW changes the WAC to say that a decoy is a plastic object that looks like a bird they will remain illegal.

Offline aaronoto

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 443
  • Location: NW WA
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #108 on: November 16, 2014, 08:12:25 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.

Yep, it's the courts job to interpret the law.  Now in a case like this a specific instance might need to go to court for a precedence to be set as to how the law is legally interpreted and therefore should be enforced.  I wouldn't want it to be me...

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Selkirk bull moose. by 6haase6
[Today at 02:57:31 PM]


Steel Targets??? by bowman
[Today at 02:51:34 PM]


Greenriver quality Elk permit by First timer
[Today at 02:34:44 PM]


Bow mount trolling motors by Stein
[Today at 09:05:06 AM]


Oregon results posted. by trophyhunt
[Today at 08:51:12 AM]


best draw for moose unit wise by hunter399
[Today at 08:31:10 AM]


Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by trophyelk6x6
[Today at 08:24:13 AM]


2025 OILS! by Ridgerunner
[Today at 07:40:49 AM]


FFL preferences or warnings in Olympia or south Sound area? by lhrbull
[Today at 06:59:24 AM]


Nooksack Archery Tag by LongBomb
[Today at 06:29:37 AM]


I’m on a blacktail mission by Turner89
[Yesterday at 11:33:35 PM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 09:54:06 PM]


Basin elk by hughjorgan
[Yesterday at 09:50:49 PM]


Getting back into dogs by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 09:06:14 PM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by Nwgunner
[Yesterday at 08:55:00 PM]


MA-10 Coho by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 08:50:46 PM]


Is FS70 open? by CarbonHunter
[Yesterday at 08:09:04 PM]


Muzzy Mission Quality!!! by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 07:49:11 PM]


Colockum Archery Bull Tag by Smittyk44
[Yesterday at 04:23:53 PM]


49 degrees north late Moose tag by Buzzsaw461
[Yesterday at 04:11:52 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal