collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Are wave machines legal?  (Read 42750 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10636
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #105 on: November 15, 2014, 09:47:33 PM »
Looks like Bigtex was correct  :chuckle:  :rockin:

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #106 on: November 16, 2014, 05:15:15 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10636
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #107 on: November 16, 2014, 08:07:10 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
Until WDFW changes the WAC to say that a decoy is a plastic object that looks like a bird they will remain illegal.

Offline aaronoto

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 443
  • Location: NW WA
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #108 on: November 16, 2014, 08:12:25 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.

Yep, it's the courts job to interpret the law.  Now in a case like this a specific instance might need to go to court for a precedence to be set as to how the law is legally interpreted and therefore should be enforced.  I wouldn't want it to be me...

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho's new Deer/Elk License System by huntnnw
[Today at 10:03:28 PM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 09:52:46 PM]


Antelope next year? by jstone
[Today at 07:39:59 PM]


Pinks! by Stein
[Today at 06:33:42 PM]


Sportsman Alliance files petition to Gov Ferguson for removal of corrupt WA Wildlife Commissioners by ghosthunter
[Today at 06:29:43 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Today at 06:09:07 PM]


2025 OILS! by Whitenuckles
[Today at 05:16:45 PM]


2024 Quality Buck coming home by Whitenuckles
[Today at 05:10:28 PM]


Alaska 2025 by Whitenuckles
[Today at 05:09:18 PM]


Do folks run their refrigerators on Propane while towing their RV's? by huntandjeep
[Today at 04:11:54 PM]


Tooth age on Quinault bull by nwwanderer
[Today at 04:02:04 PM]


Skunks by Humptulips
[Today at 02:21:06 PM]


Ross Lake boat launch? by cjjcb
[Today at 02:06:21 PM]


Cougar Problems Toroda Creek Road Near Bodie by Sakko300wsm
[Today at 01:50:02 PM]


Muzzleloader scope options by huntnphool
[Today at 01:25:33 PM]


MOVED: Purebred Chesapeake Puppy by Woodchuck
[Today at 01:18:02 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by bear
[Today at 05:38:00 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal