collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Are wave machines legal?  (Read 43699 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10658
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #105 on: November 15, 2014, 09:47:33 PM »
Looks like Bigtex was correct  :chuckle:  :rockin:

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #106 on: November 16, 2014, 05:15:15 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10658
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #107 on: November 16, 2014, 08:07:10 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
Until WDFW changes the WAC to say that a decoy is a plastic object that looks like a bird they will remain illegal.

Offline aaronoto

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 443
  • Location: NW WA
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #108 on: November 16, 2014, 08:12:25 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.

Yep, it's the courts job to interpret the law.  Now in a case like this a specific instance might need to go to court for a precedence to be set as to how the law is legally interpreted and therefore should be enforced.  I wouldn't want it to be me...

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Roosevelt Elk. Please nudge me in the right direction. I feel hopeless. by fowl smacker
[Today at 08:02:48 PM]


Colville lodging, any recommendations? by 762Gunner
[Today at 07:37:54 PM]


Youth cow tag success by Mfowl
[Today at 07:23:59 PM]


Multi season elk by Mfowl
[Today at 07:19:15 PM]


CB Radio Hints and Tips, Installing guidance. by ghosthunter
[Today at 07:07:45 PM]


Who knows Stihl Chainsaws? messed up and cooked my 044 hoping to save/rebuild by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Today at 06:49:08 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by westside bull
[Today at 06:39:00 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Today at 05:59:58 PM]


Bogachiel boat accident by GWP
[Today at 05:52:00 PM]


NAVY BEAN SOUP by Alchase
[Today at 05:27:01 PM]


BNSF Land Access by Goshawk
[Today at 04:39:34 PM]


GL Late Tag holders by waoutdoorsman
[Today at 03:48:26 PM]


Hunting with a suppressor - dumb idea? by addicted
[Today at 03:46:22 PM]


2024 Ford Edge Opinion by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 03:31:28 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by ghosthunter
[Today at 02:51:04 PM]


Now licensed in WA OR ID and GA by pianoman9701
[Today at 02:20:32 PM]


2025 opener by hdshot
[Today at 12:57:52 PM]


Duck Hunting Land Trust by JBG
[Today at 11:48:56 AM]


"Border Lands Conservation Act" courtesy of Mike Lee (R-UT) by kentrek
[Today at 11:09:06 AM]


Cerakote by duramax
[Today at 10:54:05 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal