collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Are wave machines legal?  (Read 45452 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10691
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #105 on: November 15, 2014, 09:47:33 PM »
Looks like Bigtex was correct  :chuckle:  :rockin:

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #106 on: November 16, 2014, 05:15:15 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10691
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #107 on: November 16, 2014, 08:07:10 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
Until WDFW changes the WAC to say that a decoy is a plastic object that looks like a bird they will remain illegal.

Offline aaronoto

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 444
  • Location: NW WA
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #108 on: November 16, 2014, 08:12:25 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.

Yep, it's the courts job to interpret the law.  Now in a case like this a specific instance might need to go to court for a precedence to be set as to how the law is legally interpreted and therefore should be enforced.  I wouldn't want it to be me...

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Lost in the Fog by eap7899
[Yesterday at 11:54:52 PM]


Montana Big Game Combo Draw chances by 257 Wby Mag
[Yesterday at 11:15:11 PM]


Big game season proposals by jstone
[Yesterday at 09:28:47 PM]


Not fact checked, but I can relate. by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 09:00:33 PM]


Elk camp upgrade/luxury item? by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 08:37:23 PM]


2026 Sheds “Found one” by Roslyn Rambler
[Yesterday at 07:19:41 PM]


New Zealand in May by Torrent50
[Yesterday at 02:50:58 PM]


Morels 26 by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 01:37:52 PM]


Colockum Archery Bull Tag by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 12:25:34 PM]


Spring! by brokentrail
[Yesterday at 12:10:04 PM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 10:38:43 AM]


Arrow preference by mburrows
[Yesterday at 05:53:21 AM]


Muzzle loading shotguns? Educate me by Night goat
[March 23, 2026, 11:29:17 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal