collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW  (Read 109441 times)

Offline JakeLand

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+35)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 4594
  • Location: Wet side
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #75 on: November 02, 2014, 11:00:36 AM »
I just sent in the letter also :tup:

Offline oldleclercrd

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 1446
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #76 on: November 02, 2014, 11:07:25 AM »
Thanks everyone for standing up. Just to point out again (I won't go into great detail) "Baiting" is also the use of scents to attract... doe in estrous, scrape scent, elk fire, ect. It's illegal to use scents when hunting bear, don't think they won't go all out on deer/elk.
Aim small, miss small.

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 9011
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #77 on: November 02, 2014, 11:09:44 AM »
Thanks everyone for standing up. Just to point out again (I won't go into great detail) "Baiting" is also the use of scents to attract... doe in estrous, scrape scent, elk fire, ect. It's illegal to use scents when hunting bear, don't think they won't go all out on deer/elk.

It's unfortunate that most people don't realize that.

Might as well not have a late whitetail archery season if you're going to outlaw baiting and scents.
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline oldleclercrd

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 1446
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #78 on: November 02, 2014, 11:10:57 AM »
 :yeah:
Aim small, miss small.

Offline 300rum

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 2363
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #79 on: November 02, 2014, 11:20:51 AM »
Just take a little thoughtful advice from those who are giving it to you.  The people who are agreeing with you already did, the people who are "on the fence" are the ones you are after and the way you are doing it may not be the best approach.   :tup: 

my position is not a tactful one and I wont back down from it.  You may not agree with me or how loud I am shouting this, but there are a lot of people under the illusion that this is a debate.  They are asleep.  This is an attack and we need their help. 

Apathy is unlikely.  If they go to the anti hunter side of the line then at least I will know who they are.

What is more likely, and my inbox of support shows this, there are far more that have thanked me than those who have told me to stop.

Your support for hunting is appreciate and Ill have your back in the same way if you ever need it.

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #80 on: November 02, 2014, 11:23:32 AM »
I just sent in the letter also :tup:

Thanks Jake.
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

Offline 300rum

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 2363
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #81 on: November 02, 2014, 11:24:42 AM »
I never thought of it that way!  I have never taken an animal with a 300rum, actually.  I bought one when it first came out, bought one of the first ones for an Alaska trip.  I bow hunt this state!   :chuckle: 

I think if you use a 300RUM you are more pro-shooting rather than hunting... after all... all that is required is walking around and glassing cuts with high powered optics and then shooting them."... That's fine but it's not what I call hunting.

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #82 on: November 02, 2014, 11:26:21 AM »
I never thought of it that way!  I have never taken an animal with a 300rum, actually.  I bought one when it first came out, bought one of the first ones for an Alaska trip.  I bow hunt this state!   :chuckle: 

I think if you use a 300RUM you are more pro-shooting rather than hunting... after all... all that is required is walking around and glassing cuts with high powered optics and then shooting them."... That's fine but it's not what I call hunting.

 :chuckle:
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

Offline 300rum

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 2363
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #83 on: November 02, 2014, 11:29:16 AM »
If I could change one thing in this state, it would be that all "biologist's" must be hunters and have a hunting license.  One of the biggest problems is that they don't, most used to back in the day but they don't anymore.  One wildlife area that I know of (Federal) in a very popular area had zero biologist's that ever had a hunting license in their life, that is telling. 

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #84 on: November 02, 2014, 11:31:36 AM »
If I could change one thing in this state, it would be that all "biologist's" must be hunters and have a hunting license.  One of the biggest problems is that they don't, most used to back in the day but they don't anymore.  One wildlife area that I know of (Federal) in a very popular area had zero biologist's that ever had a hunting license in their life, that is telling.

I agree.
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

Offline GBoyd

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2014
  • Posts: 369
Re: Use of attractants under threat in Washington state for deer and elk.
« Reply #85 on: November 02, 2014, 11:47:00 AM »
I'm not sure I understand what is different about this law. Is this a change?

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45332
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Use of attractants under threat in Washington state for deer and elk.
« Reply #86 on: November 02, 2014, 11:52:48 AM »
It would be a change if deer and elk baiting were prohibited with the same restrictions as the baiting of bears. It would mean the elk or deer urine would then be considered baiting. The rumor is that an end to elk and deer baiting is near.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline PolarBear

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 10468
  • Location: Tatooine
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #87 on: November 02, 2014, 12:49:21 PM »




Might as well not have a late whitetail archery season if you're going to outlaw baiting and scents.



Many of us have done very well for many years hunting late whitetail archery using neither bait or scents.   :twocents:

Offline oldleclercrd

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 1446
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #88 on: November 02, 2014, 01:01:34 PM »
Yeah I've been successful late season without using either one also. I've also been successful using them. It's legal to do so and I want to keep my options open. I sure hope you've NEVER used scents while hunting or that would make you a hypocrite, right?
Aim small, miss small.

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #89 on: November 02, 2014, 02:16:07 PM »
Yeah I've been successful late season without using either one also. I've also been successful using them. It's legal to do so and I want to keep my options open. I sure hope you've NEVER used scents while hunting or that would make you a hypocrite, right?

PB doesn't like baiting but I don't think he supports restricting us from baiting.
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Late huckelberry bull by Wanttohuntmore
[Today at 08:21:54 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by skagitsteel
[Today at 08:21:54 AM]


328/329 reports by teanawayslayer
[Today at 07:50:12 AM]


Jim Horn's elk calling, instructional audio CD's. by str8meat
[Yesterday at 11:35:51 PM]


Xlr element vs mdt hnt26 by Wolfdog2314
[Yesterday at 10:33:59 PM]


Unit 130/ 139 by JCBrown
[Yesterday at 10:23:16 PM]


My first Bobcat by BelongsOutside
[Yesterday at 10:06:04 PM]


Drew Pogue Quality by MikeC
[Yesterday at 08:59:03 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Rob Allen
[Yesterday at 08:46:49 PM]


My first blacktail! by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 08:41:08 PM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 07:34:44 PM]


Montana Elk Partner?? by redi
[Yesterday at 07:28:35 PM]


CB Radio Hints and Tips, Installing guidance. by Rat44
[Yesterday at 06:59:16 PM]


Flank steak on the Rec Teq by brew
[Yesterday at 06:46:02 PM]


Roosevelt Elk. Please nudge me in the right direction. I feel hopeless. by Dark2Dark
[Yesterday at 06:45:25 PM]


Turkey Summer Sausage by Russ McDonald
[Yesterday at 05:57:02 PM]


Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by chukarchaser
[Yesterday at 05:51:34 PM]


Game Warden Channel featuring my nephew on Nevada Wild by danderson
[Yesterday at 05:08:18 PM]


Well, it could be worse... by Blacktail Sniper
[Yesterday at 04:04:39 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 03:38:49 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal