collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW  (Read 105310 times)

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #255 on: February 09, 2015, 08:46:06 PM »
Pay attention to the last sentence.  We are setting ourselves up far a fall if we don't use reason.  Ton's of apples and feeders will end baiting for us. 

http://ckwri.tamuk.edu/fileadmin/user_upload/PHOTOS/Deer-Research_Program/Class_files/The_Nutritional__Ecological__and_Ethical_Arguments_Against_Baiting_and_Feeding_White-tailed_Deer_Brown.pdf

An interesting article.
http://missoulian.com/lifestyles/recreation/bait-hunts-cause-host-of-problems-for-wildlife-habitat-and/article_0ba87436-2524-11e3-aa82-001a4bcf887a.html

This is a highly controversial subject.  If hunters don't step up to identify ways to make baiting more palatable to the middle of the road public.  The middle of the road public may vote in a direction that will further destroy our heritage. 

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25033
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #256 on: February 09, 2015, 09:02:22 PM »
How is it that there is a bill to bring back bear baiting yet there is this BS to eliminate baiting for deer and elk?  :bash: :bash: :bash:
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #257 on: February 09, 2015, 09:14:27 PM »
How is it that there is a bill to bring back bear baiting yet there is this BS to eliminate baiting for deer and elk?  :bash: :bash: :bash:

Because hunters brought it to the table.  That is how it works.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25033
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #258 on: February 09, 2015, 09:17:10 PM »
I know... I followed the postings... To me it just shows how ham fisted the WDFW actually is!
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline drk9988

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 48
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #259 on: February 09, 2015, 09:21:48 PM »
Dont get me wrong I am 100% ok with the 10 gallon option.

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #260 on: February 09, 2015, 09:32:47 PM »
Dont get me wrong I am 100% ok with the 10 gallon option.

I think 5 gallons would be more defensible form a science end but, I think I can defend ten gallons.   

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39181
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #261 on: February 09, 2015, 10:55:28 PM »
Just remember they may start with a 10 gallon limit then when they pull out their calculators and do some math they will decide to charge you for a permit to bait deer and elk like they are trying to do with bear right now.  :twocents:

The proposal for baiting bears was not written by the WDFW.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39181
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #262 on: February 09, 2015, 11:00:25 PM »
Just FYI:
Quote
No Bait Allowed:

Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wyoming

Baiting Allowed In Entire State:

Arizona, Hawaii, Kansas, Nevada, New Hampshire, Mississippi, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah, Washington

Baiting Only In Selected Areas:

Connecticut, Florida, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Texas, Wisconsin
- See more at: http://www.skinnymoose.com/hooksandbullets/2008/10/14/deer-baiting-across-the-us/#sthash.5itFXjkG.dpuf

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14539
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #263 on: February 09, 2015, 11:04:20 PM »
Just FYI:
Quote
No Bait Allowed:

Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wyoming

Baiting Allowed In Entire State:

Arizona, Hawaii, Kansas, Nevada, New Hampshire, Mississippi, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah, Washington

Baiting Only In Selected Areas:

Connecticut, Florida, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Texas, Wisconsin
- See more at: http://www.skinnymoose.com/hooksandbullets/2008/10/14/deer-baiting-across-the-us/#sthash.5itFXjkG.dpuf
did Alaska change?  Thought you could still bait bears.  :dunno:

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39181
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #264 on: February 09, 2015, 11:10:32 PM »
Just FYI:
Quote
No Bait Allowed:

Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wyoming

Baiting Allowed In Entire State:

Arizona, Hawaii, Kansas, Nevada, New Hampshire, Mississippi, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah, Washington

Baiting Only In Selected Areas:

Connecticut, Florida, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Texas, Wisconsin
- See more at: http://www.skinnymoose.com/hooksandbullets/2008/10/14/deer-baiting-across-the-us/#sthash.5itFXjkG.dpuf
did Alaska change?  Thought you could still bait bears.  :dunno:

This article was about baiting deer, not bears.

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14539
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #265 on: February 09, 2015, 11:14:11 PM »
oops missed that part............

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 15960
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #266 on: February 10, 2015, 07:41:13 AM »
Posted this another thread also.
I think the most important thing at this point is to go to the comment section of the proposals and send a message saying that you are against any kind of restriction on baiting.  If they get enough squeaky wheels complaining the other way they will remove it from the proposal at the March meeting.  Just state that you are against the restriction, their proposal even says in it that there is no scientific study to back up whether it hurts or helps the herd.  Also state how many in your hunting party are against it and that you and none of them were contacted during the telephone survey.

I have been to these approval meetings before and if enough people make an argument one way they often times go with it.

It is not too late to have them just strike both options from the upcoming regs and leave things status quo.  I have seen it before and hope that they do it again on this subject.

Go here and click on the "view and comment" button, then on the next page click on the "Start commenting" on the side of all three proposals and let your voice be heard.

http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/regulations/seasonsetting/

Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25033
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #267 on: February 10, 2015, 08:12:53 AM »
I strongly oppose any change to baiting laws. I was not contacted on the survey. Comments on hunting season regs in this fashion should require our Wild ID# Since I buy tags I have a Vested interest in the rules. Comments made without Wild ID# have no proof of that interest. The department is mandated to use sound science to make rules not public opinion polls. It is not sound logic to ban bait because of one incident that got bad press.
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 15960
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #268 on: February 10, 2015, 08:16:15 AM »
I strongly oppose any change to baiting laws. I was not contacted on the survey. Comments on hunting season regs in this fashion should require our Wild ID# Since I buy tags I have a Vested interest in the rules. Comments made without Wild ID# have no proof of that interest. The department is mandated to use sound science to make rules not public opinion polls. It is not sound logic to ban bait because of one incident that got bad press.
Great comment and I hope you sent that to the WDFW on the comment section.  This is the exact thing that they need to hear.

On the survey that was sent out they had over 60% against a change, in the phone survey it was just the opposite.  I would trust the email survey where you had to have a wild ID number over a phone survey any day.
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline BABackcountryBwhntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 350
  • Location: SW Wa
  • Groups: NRA,CCA,RMEF,WSA,NFAA....
Re: OPPOSE ANY RESTRICTION ON BAITING - EMAIL TO WDFW
« Reply #269 on: February 10, 2015, 09:31:56 AM »
I've been baiting blacktails for three years now and have yet to be successful. In fact in all that time I've only had one deer come in to the apples while I was sitting in the blind, and it was a little fawn, and even at that, it was right at dark with only 5 minutes of legal time left. I get plenty of pictures with the trail camera, but of course, they're all at night.

My buddy and I did it one year on private ground close to a city. And we did it up well! Found the perfect spots for both stands. Started in late summer. We had a hook up for apples and filled garbage cans full of them on a weakly basis when they got in season. Before that it was bags a week of rolled corn an molasses. We ended up with well over a thousand pics on the cams. Some cool ones with coons and deer in the same pics. We had several pic's of two different good bucks. Not one in the daylight even in the summer. But we kept packing those apples out there. We planned on hunting it in the late season. Last day of the regular season we got rained and fogged out up high and decided to sit in our stands that last afternnon. I saw two small bucks basically come running in (not to the bait) chasing does. We thought it was going to be magical come the late season.

Didn't work out exactly that way. Even the few close to town does were wary coming into the bait. Never saw a single buck in two full days come in. I did shoot a small 4 point still hunting the last day a half mile away. Looking at the time and effort we put into that it was one of my hardest hunts I ever did. The pic's we got made it worth it. These guys that seems to think it is some easy slam dunk cheating thing are fools. I guess I shouldn't call them fools, they just don't know any better.

My bet us these are the guys that haven't had much success filling tags no matter what they did. They probably tried to go dump off a five gallon bucket of apples once and expected the deer to roll in. When that didn't happen they jumped on the outlaw it bandwagon, why should others have success when they can't?


Great post! we bait here in oregon and the first year we took 2 book bucks, but it was just like you said... tons of apples all summer long and night time pics over and over... we only had 4 days that a buck was on cam in the day.. 2 of those day we were lucky enough to be in stand... this year we had 2 big bucks on cam.. the big 4x4 showed up 3 days all season.. we were not in stand on those days.. we passed a few smaller bucks and one nice 3x3.. it is far far from easy and requires tons of work to do it properly.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

where is everyone? by JDHasty
[Today at 01:30:10 AM]


Stuffed Pork Chop by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 11:12:59 PM]


I’m on a blacktail mission by skagitsteel
[Yesterday at 09:45:22 PM]


Another great day in the turkey woods. by Remington Outdoors
[Yesterday at 09:43:57 PM]


Bow mount trolling motors by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:11:28 PM]


Buck age by kentrek
[Yesterday at 08:56:47 PM]


Oregon special tag info by Judespapa
[Yesterday at 08:37:07 PM]


Eastern WA-WT hunting from tree stands?? by hunter399
[Yesterday at 07:59:18 PM]


Hoof Rot by Dirtnap
[Yesterday at 04:39:37 PM]


Honda BF15A Outboard Problems by CP
[Yesterday at 01:36:59 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by HighlandLofts
[Yesterday at 12:01:17 PM]


Get ready for the 4th of July by rosscrazyelk
[Yesterday at 09:36:56 AM]


Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle by Karl Blanchard
[Yesterday at 09:15:32 AM]


Wolf documentary PBS by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:09:55 AM]


Idaho Mt goat draft plan by time2hunt
[Yesterday at 07:59:04 AM]


Cougar Problems Toroda Creek Road Near Bodie by Elkaholic daWg
[Yesterday at 07:52:17 AM]


Disabled Fishing License by Blacklab
[Yesterday at 07:44:43 AM]


Ever win the WDFW Big Game Raffle? by jackelope
[Yesterday at 07:18:59 AM]


Missoula Fishing by borntoslay
[June 06, 2025, 11:30:10 PM]


Iceberg shrimp closed by Tbar
[June 06, 2025, 10:55:37 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal