Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: Wacenturion on November 04, 2014, 11:44:24 PMI'm right there with you. As I have said in a couple threads....NRA, and others need to attack it legally as soon as possible.....won't stand up. No reason to do so otherwise. We have representation.
I'm right there with you. As I have said in a couple threads....NRA, and others need to attack it legally as soon as possible.....won't stand up.
Looks like it passed. I will not be complying
Quote from: Bob33 on November 05, 2014, 08:29:01 AMQuote from: HntnFsh on November 05, 2014, 05:59:54 AMWe voted no on 594 and reluctantly voted yes on 591. As I feel its a lesser of 2 evils thing and had no choice. Fortunately it wont affect me as I have no firearms! And no intentions of aquiring any! I will be working on the wife, talking her into moving to a more friendly state when I retire in a few yearsFYI: if someone owns muzzleloaders, they are considered firearms in Washington and are subject to the same restrictions which means they cannot be transferred with a background check, subject to the same exemptions.Are you sure about that? I know they're considered to be firearms under state law, but they are not firearms under federal law. Currently when you purchase a muzzleloader in this state you do not need to go through an FFL. How does 594 change that?
Quote from: HntnFsh on November 05, 2014, 05:59:54 AMWe voted no on 594 and reluctantly voted yes on 591. As I feel its a lesser of 2 evils thing and had no choice. Fortunately it wont affect me as I have no firearms! And no intentions of aquiring any! I will be working on the wife, talking her into moving to a more friendly state when I retire in a few yearsFYI: if someone owns muzzleloaders, they are considered firearms in Washington and are subject to the same restrictions which means they cannot be transferred with a background check, subject to the same exemptions.
We voted no on 594 and reluctantly voted yes on 591. As I feel its a lesser of 2 evils thing and had no choice. Fortunately it wont affect me as I have no firearms! And no intentions of aquiring any! I will be working on the wife, talking her into moving to a more friendly state when I retire in a few years
Quote from: Jonathan_S on November 05, 2014, 04:14:58 AMQuote from: Wacenturion on November 04, 2014, 11:44:24 PMI'm right there with you. As I have said in a couple threads....NRA, and others need to attack it legally as soon as possible.....won't stand up. No reason to do so otherwise. We have representation. your kidding right?unless your only 25 or so and have not noticed Blue and Red make Purple.Everytime something like this passes and we do nothing except play the political game I can hear those in thier graves rolling over of those who faught to create this country that was supposed to be free from this kind of Tyranny.and were to refresh the tree of liberty from time to time but don't. and it's all for what it's supposed to be better for different generations? World peace, more like World Socialism and absolute power.
(9) "Firearm" means a weapon or device from which a projectile or projectiles may be fired by an explosive such as gunpowder.
Quote from: csaaphill on November 05, 2014, 11:44:10 AMQuote from: Jonathan_S on November 05, 2014, 04:14:58 AMQuote from: Wacenturion on November 04, 2014, 11:44:24 PMI'm right there with you. As I have said in a couple threads....NRA, and others need to attack it legally as soon as possible.....won't stand up. No reason to do so otherwise. We have representation. your kidding right?unless your only 25 or so and have not noticed Blue and Red make Purple.Everytime something like this passes and we do nothing except play the political game I can hear those in thier graves rolling over of those who faught to create this country that was supposed to be free from this kind of Tyranny.and were to refresh the tree of liberty from time to time but don't. and it's all for what it's supposed to be better for different generations? World peace, more like World Socialism and absolute power. Yes, those people did not have representation.
Your point seems to be that we should begin a violent revolt because you've had it up "to here". Then what?I am saying those people who fought and died in the American Revolution did not have anyone to represent them and were pressed into combat to get their point across. You are much better off and we still have a constitution (though it is encroached upon) and that is where I think the focus should be - on fighting a legal battle.