collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Are wave machines legal?  (Read 43989 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10671
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #105 on: November 15, 2014, 09:47:33 PM »
Looks like Bigtex was correct  :chuckle:  :rockin:

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #106 on: November 16, 2014, 05:15:15 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10671
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #107 on: November 16, 2014, 08:07:10 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
Until WDFW changes the WAC to say that a decoy is a plastic object that looks like a bird they will remain illegal.

Offline aaronoto

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 444
  • Location: NW WA
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #108 on: November 16, 2014, 08:12:25 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.

Yep, it's the courts job to interpret the law.  Now in a case like this a specific instance might need to go to court for a precedence to be set as to how the law is legally interpreted and therefore should be enforced.  I wouldn't want it to be me...

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2027 Pink Run Destroyed by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 10:12:04 PM]


Hey, Seahawks fans! by ganghis
[Yesterday at 10:01:44 PM]


Question about Hancock Timber Co Eastside by hunter399
[Yesterday at 09:37:59 PM]


WA Bucket List….Mule Deer Permit by hunter399
[Yesterday at 09:32:08 PM]


F150 Tire/Wheel Guys by elksnout
[Yesterday at 05:26:33 PM]


The Rack by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 05:14:27 PM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by jrebel
[Yesterday at 05:06:49 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 04:24:59 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by Twispriver
[Yesterday at 02:31:20 PM]


Cell Cams for Westside Elk by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 02:26:48 PM]


This Jeff Davis guy. by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 02:14:52 PM]


Crazy looking Deer by Gobble Doc
[Yesterday at 01:23:27 PM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Yesterday at 01:22:08 PM]


Darwood Outfitters by Skyvalhunter
[Yesterday at 01:04:49 PM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by 253CritterGetter
[Yesterday at 12:24:57 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal