Free: Contests & Raffles.
In his presentation to Montana, Idaho, Wyoming and Oregon sportsmen, guides & outfitters, media and politicians, Jim Beers shared how he worked his way up through the ranks. And while working with the Pittman-Robertson funds, he was also appointed to work with U.S. Trade Representative groups and the State Department to address a European Union ban on furs taken with leg hold traps in the U.S. and Russia.Beers has always considered himself a wildlife manager, holding a Bachelors Degree in Wildlife Resources. He sees the use of leg hold traps as an effective tool for managing furbearers, such as raccoons, foxes, coyotes and mink. And made an all out effort to get the European ban removed from U.S. furs. And thanks largely to his efforts, it was.He says that he was fully aware of USFWS regularly meeting with “environmental” and “animal rights” groups in secrecy, and entering into under the table agreements with them. After the defeat of the efforts to outlaw the use of leg hold traps in the U.S., he noticed a very different attitude toward him. Beers feels that the outcome was not what USFWS may have agreed to with groups pushing for the elimination of leg hold traps in this country.Later in the 1990s, while working with the distribution of sportsmen provided excise taxes, he began to question why the amount of Pittman-Robertson funds being distributed to state wildlife agencies had failed to increase over a several year period. This was during the Clinton administration, and a fear that the administration would make it increasingly difficult to buy firearms and ammunition resulted in frenzy buying and stockpiling. With such record sales, Beers rationalized that there should be a parallel increase in the amount of excise taxes collected - but he was not seeing that trend in the amount he had to distribute. His probing of this issue must have hit a nerve or two with upper USFWS management, and he suddenly found himself put on administrative leave, and told to “Go Fishing...With Pay!”He was also threatened, and told not to discuss the issue with anyone, or he could lose his job and health benefits. However, while Beers was not officially “on the job”, co-workers handling the distribution of Pittman-Robertson monies often asked him to take a look at this or that, and for advice. While stepping into the office to “visit” on one opportunity, one of those co-workers asked him to look over a massive print out of the expenditures made with Pittman-Robertson funds, and Jim was surprised to find numerous uses of the taxes collected to fund non-hunting and non-fishing related projects. Those discrepancies included funding for wildlife management lands used for the building of a prison, to fund park improvements, and for purchasing USFWS vehicles. None of which qualify for funding under the Pittman-Robertson Act.So, what does all of this have to do with wolves? Read on.Beers blew the whistle on the misappropriation of monies that were supposed to be used exclusively for wildlife habitat and fisheries improvement. And Congress launched an official inquiry.What they discovered was that USFWS had embezzled as much as $60- to $70-million from the excise taxes collected on sportsman purchases of guns, ammo and fishing tackle. According to Beers, when USFWS Director Jamie Rappaport Clark was questioned about the unauthorized use of these monies, her comment was something to the effect of, “I was told the money was to be used where I felt it was needed.”So, where did USFWS use “your” tax dollars...the money that was supposed to be for funding projects that insure the health of the wildlife and fish resources sportsmen have worked so hard to build? According to Jim Beers, one use was to fund the introduction of those Canadian wolves into the Northern Rockies. That’s right, they used “your” money to fund dumping wolves into one of the richest wildlife areas of North America - unleashing the wildlife equivalent of cancer to destroy the past hundred years of sound wildlife conservation efforts (at the cost of hundreds of millions of sportsman dollars). And those wolves are now at out-of-control numbers, and they are dealing a death blow to elk, moose, deer and other big game populations in many areas of Montana, Idaho and Wyoming.Beers says another use of “your” excise tax dollars was to construct a new Regional USFWS Office in California.Congress had already turned down funding for both these projects - so USFWS took it upon themselves to dip deeply into Pittman-Robertson funds to finance these projects...without any authorization whatsoever. And if these two misappropriations of funds is not enough of a slap in the face to the sportsmen who provided those monies, USFWS also used “your” money to establish a “slush fund” to provide bonuses for Director Clark, division chiefs, and managers at federal and regional levels. And they rewarded themselves well. Those who had excelled at their jobs generally received $25,000 to $30,000. But even those who only mustered a mediocre rating in how they performed their responsibilities usually received a bonus of around $5,000. What the heck, it was free money...so why not?(I followed all of this back in the late 1990s, and I remember that some of the Pittman-Robertson monies that were wrongfully taken from hunters and fishermen were even used to reimburse USFWS employees for relocation expenses. T.B.)So, what did Jim Beers receive for being so honest and forthright? How about a forced retirement, and once again the threat of losing benefits if he kept the spotlight on this issue. In fact, he was offered a payoff to keep quiet about it for three years. He took the money. Still, he kept researching elements of the Wolf Recovery Project that were handled improperly. Following are some issues which he says are in violation of the law:*Unauthorized taking of Pittman-Robertson funds to finance projects (and bonuses) that did not qualify.*That Wolf Recovery Project coordinator Ed Bangs failed to file an appropriate and accurate Environmental Impact Statement. Beers says Bangs purposely ignored all established wolf science and research, dismissing known wolf depredation impact to wildlife & livestock, and he ignored the dangers of the parasites and diseases carried which are a threat to other wildlife, livestock, pets and to humans (Beers claims that wolves carry 30 known parasites & diseases - most of which are a danger to humans). He says Ed Bangs ignored published historic record of wolf impact and health/safety issues.*Ed Bangs failed to file Form 3-177, which is required for importation of any wildlife or fish species, including wolves. The form requires declaration of the number being brought into the country, and the species/subspecies being brought into the country. Beers says there is no record of the mandatory form ever being filed.*That for USFWS to go ahead and “find funding elsewhere” for constructing the California Regional Office, and to fund the introduction of wolves even after the projects had been turned down by Congress is a violation of the agency’s authority.*That USFWS wrongfully supplemented federal funds with private money to introduce wolves. (Even if approved by Congress, federal budgets cannot by supplemented with private contributions from companies or organizations - or with monies misappropriated from other federal project funds.)*Beers also claims that for USFWS to allow Defenders of Wildlife to reimburse livestock producers for the loss of stock to wolves, but for them not to reimburse for the loss of wildlife or not to reimburse for the loss of a pet or not to reimburse for losses/injury to humans caused by wolves violates the equal treatment outlined by the Constitution.While as much as $70-million dollars was robbed from Pittman-Robertson funds, and used to fund non Congress approved projects, very little (nothing) was done to investigate this crime - or exactly where all of that money went. USFWS was, at that time, pushing a non-hunting agenda (and still does today). Likewise, so were most all state wildlife agencies. Beers feels that much of the missing millions ended up funding bird watching areas, hiking trails and like projects in many states - even though the money had been collected from hunting and fishing gear sales, and was supposed to go right back into game and fisheries habitat improvement.Not one state wildlife agency demanded that USFWS replace the stolen money - and not one person involved was ever tried for such grand theft.
I read this a couple of years ago. It makes me sick what the crooks in our government are getting away with and bilking us for.
What?No way!Over Twenty Four hours and our local wolf simpathizers have not justified the pro-wolf actions?
Bonnie Kline is still employed as computer specialist in the Interior Department's US Fish and Wildlife Service but she has been "drydesked" or not allowed to work. Since then she has been depending on the financial support of friends while battling the federal government in a case of alleged harassment filed under federal whistleblower laws.With her security clearance and expertise, Kline had access to essentially all available computer records in her department, including those sought by investigators seeking evidence in the case of USFWS whistleblower James Beers.
Under the Federal Aid Program, funds collected through excise taxes on hunting and fishing products were to be used for conservation programs among individual states. Instead, officials allegedly diverted the money to so-called slush funds. According to Beers, USFWS officials plotted with animal rights groups to undermine the hunting and fishing conservation efforts of the agency's employees.Kline testified in a recent congressional hearing that senior officials at the USFWS headquarters in Arlington, Virginia escorted her onto a private balcony on June 17, 1998 to coerce her to not cooperate with an investigation into the agency's suspect spending habits.During that impromptu meeting, Kline's bosses allegedly threatened to destroy her career if she cooperated with OSC investigators or if she responded to a subpoena issued by Congress in Beers' case, which also drew the attention of Rep. Don Young (R-AK). Young is chairman of the House Resources Committee that has direct oversight of the USFWS."I was told that the subject of the investigation was extremely serious and 'went right to the top.' I was not to allow myself to be involved in these matters in any way," Kline said. "I was then offered a substantial pay increase if I moved to another job immediately, but without my security access and access to Fish & Wildlife Service communications. And to this date I am still denied that access."Kline ignored the threats and chose to cooperate with OSC investigators, prompting USFWS officials to seek retribution, according to Kline. On August 7, 1998 Kline found a note on her desk insinuating physical harm. "I then discovered at that point that all of my e-mail pass codes were gone and the code to the safe storing the secured communications and back-up tapes of communications had been changed," Kline testified before Congress.When it became apparent that her livelihood was at stake, Kline sought legal protection and representation from the OSC, just as Beers had done.Kline said the retribution she suffered ruined her health and destroyed her "hard-earned financial credit and reputation." Kline said her two children are "confused and frightened" by the punishment she received in return for her honesty. Kline said she has been forced to live below the federal government's definition of the poverty level. Kline said she has been subjected to "continuous threatening verbal and physical gestures and bullying" from her supervisors. "I am constantly subjected to humiliating remarks by my supervisor in front of my friends and fellow employees, including disparaging remarks about my clothing and physical appearance."USFWS officials have allegedly ignored orders from administrative court judge Bruce Johnson that reprimand letters be "rescinded and removed and expunged" from her personnel file.
