Free: Contests & Raffles.
I figured since the topic was posted to gather support to maintain baiting for deer and elk and thosewho do not support baiting not to respond. Well that is aarrogance at its finest. If anything I think washington would be better to go to no baiting like missouri does. If it grows it IS NOT BAITING. If you place it on the ground it is baiting. Just my thoughts but, if you just have to dump a bunch of hay or apples on the ground you might as well do a canned hunt.
Quite obviously
You have to place the seeds on the ground for anything to grow. Apples grow.One guy plants corn to attract deer and places his stand where he expects deer to go eat the corn.Another guy puts out apples and places his stand where he expects deer to eat the apples.Whats the difference?I dont bait deer, but i dont care if someone else does it. Keep taking away little things and you end up with nothing.
Hunters are their own worst enemy. If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
Quote from: longrangehunter338 on December 07, 2014, 03:10:22 AMI figured since the topic was posted to gather support to maintain baiting for deer and elk and thosewho do not support baiting not to respond. Well that is aarrogance at its finest. If anything I think washington would be better to go to no baiting like missouri does. If it grows it IS NOT BAITING. If you place it on the ground it is baiting. Just my thoughts but, if you just have to dump a bunch of hay or apples on the ground you might as well do a canned hunt.I'd like to start a campaign to create a new law restricting rifle hunting to shots no more than 300 yards.