collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Grays Harbor vs. Weyco update  (Read 22822 times)

Offline Goshawk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 602
  • Location: Lewis County
Re: Grays Harbor vs. Weyco update
« Reply #30 on: March 15, 2015, 08:49:18 PM »
Well, any updates on The People Vs Timberland Corporations?
You'll never get a Big'un if you keep shooting Little'un's.

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: Grays Harbor vs. Weyco update
« Reply #31 on: March 15, 2015, 08:55:26 PM »
Heard there is a court date set.  Don't know when.
Too bad other counties did not join in the fight.  Guess hunters support it or they would be screaming their heads off to their elected officials.

Offline Goshawk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 602
  • Location: Lewis County
Re: Grays Harbor vs. Weyco update
« Reply #32 on: March 22, 2015, 06:51:08 PM »
Here in Washington State, our own apathy has done more to damage hunting than all the Disney Educated anti-hunters combined. 
You'll never get a Big'un if you keep shooting Little'un's.

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: Grays Harbor vs. Weyco update
« Reply #33 on: March 22, 2015, 07:00:51 PM »
Here in Washington State, our own apathy has done more to damage hunting than all the Disney Educated anti-hunters combined.

Well said :tup:

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Grays Harbor vs. Weyco update
« Reply #34 on: February 07, 2016, 09:23:43 AM »
Sounds like something is going on in the lawsuit.  Grays Harbor is getting ready to cut a secretive deal with timber.

http://thevidette.com/sections/news/local/feb-16-hearing-set-county%E2%80%99s-access-fee-ordinance-amendments.html
 
 Proposed changes to ordinance (basically removing anything about fees, all in exchange for??????)

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/commissioners/pdf/Ordinance2016-0412RepealAmendment.pdf
« Last Edit: February 07, 2016, 09:46:02 AM by fireweed »

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Grays Harbor vs. Weyco update
« Reply #35 on: February 07, 2016, 09:54:18 AM »
Interesting. Looks like we should know more on February 16th.

Offline blackdog

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 636
  • Location: Coastal
  • Advocate ..
Re: Grays Harbor vs. Weyco update
« Reply #36 on: February 07, 2016, 06:21:36 PM »
I am sure Timber Companies have already cashed the check.

Offline dscubame

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3603
  • Location: Spokane WA
  • 2013 Idaho Elk Hunt
Re: Grays Harbor vs. Weyco update
« Reply #37 on: February 07, 2016, 06:23:21 PM »
I'd much rather walk in access for free then pay to drive in.

Hell yes and it keeps others from driving in which is a double positive!
It's a TIKKA thing..., you may not understand.

Eyes in the Woods.   ' '

Offline longstevo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1000
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Grays Harbor vs. Weyco update
« Reply #38 on: February 10, 2016, 01:58:34 PM »
Following this closely.
If you don't stand behind the troops, please feel free to stand in front of us.

Offline RB

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 2979
  • Location: Arlington, washington
Re: Grays Harbor vs. Weyco update
« Reply #39 on: February 10, 2016, 03:19:19 PM »
If I was a betting man I would say nothing will change. Timber companies will still get tax breaks and charge a "Fee", or whatever legal term they can use, to charge for access. Just my  :twocents:
IAFF #3728

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Grays Harbor vs. Weyco update
« Reply #40 on: February 11, 2016, 09:57:53 AM »
Grays Harbor access advocates are trying to get lots of supporters to go to the meeting to stop a repeal of the ordinance
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1473904709510444/

Offline skipjack

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 49
  • Location: West Side
Re: Grays Harbor vs. Weyco update
« Reply #41 on: February 11, 2016, 10:54:03 AM »
I wonder if this will trickle over and change the way farmers get taxed and recieve federal money then turn around and lease ground for tens of thousands of dollars for waterfowl hunting?

Offline bowbuild

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 835
  • Location: Elma, wa.
Re: Grays Harbor vs. Weyco update
« Reply #42 on: February 12, 2016, 11:59:58 AM »
I wonder if this will trickle over and change the way farmers get taxed and recieve federal money then turn around and lease ground for tens of thousands of dollars for waterfowl hunting?

Anything with a "for profit" venture should be taxed much different in my opinion. If they choose to not charge a access fee, OR deny access, then no tax increase should be involved.

Offline cboom

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 746
  • Permanently Banned!
Re: Grays Harbor vs. Weyco update
« Reply #43 on: February 13, 2016, 12:25:15 PM »
I wonder if this will trickle over and change the way farmers get taxed and recieve federal money then turn around and lease ground for tens of thousands of dollars for waterfowl hunting?

Anything with a "for profit" venture should be taxed much different in my opinion. If they choose to not charge a access fee, OR deny access, then no tax increase should be involved.

So you think a farmer that doesn't let people on his land should lose his ag. tax status? If so I'm sure you agree that you should be paying income taxes at the highest tax bracket so those that make more than you don't have to subsidize you anymore?

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 10:28:23 AM]


Utah cow elk hunt by kselkhunter
[Today at 09:03:55 AM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Today at 07:03:46 AM]


Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle by Sneaky
[Today at 04:09:53 AM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by HillHound
[Yesterday at 11:25:17 PM]


THE ULTIMATE QUAD!!!! by Deer slayer
[Yesterday at 10:33:55 PM]


Archery elk gear, 2025. by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 09:41:28 PM]


Oregon spring bear by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 04:40:38 PM]


Tree stand for Western Washingtn by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 04:37:01 PM]


Pocket Carry by BKMFR
[Yesterday at 03:34:12 PM]


A lonely Job... by Loup Loup
[Yesterday at 01:15:11 PM]


Range finders & Angle Compensation by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 11:58:48 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Yesterday at 10:55:29 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 08:40:03 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal