collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit  (Read 14357 times)

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32895
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit
« on: December 23, 2008, 07:24:38 PM »
Its about time they went to this, I have been writing them for a couple years now.


WDFW NEWS RELEASE
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, WA 98501-1091
http://wdfw.wa.gov/

December 23, 2008
Contact: Brad James, (360) 906-6716


Sturgeon size limits will switch
to 'fork length' measurement

OLYMPIA - Starting New Year's Day, anglers fishing for sturgeon should find the big fish easier to measure for compliance with state size limits.

By mutual agreement, fishery managers in Washington and Oregon have agreed to base official size limits for white sturgeon on "fork length" - the distance between the tip of a fish's nose and the fork in its tail - rather than their full length. 

That change is designed primarily to make it easier to measure thrashing sturgeon, which often run four to five feet in length, said Brad James, a fish biologist for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW).

"In most cases, a legal-size fish under the old rules will still be a legal-size fish under the new rules," James said.  "The method of measuring the fish will change, but the size of the fish retained by anglers will remain the same."

The main problem with trying to measure the total length of a sturgeon is that the top lobe of a sturgeon's tail is longer and more flexible than the bottom lobe, James said.  "The new rule eliminates an element of subjectivity that has long been problematic for anglers and fishery managers alike," he said.

An illustration of measuring a sturgeon according to fork length is posted on the WDFW website (http://wdfw.wa.gov/fishing/sturgeon/index.html ).

Starting Jan. 1, both the minimum and maximum size limits for retaining white sturgeon will be adjusted to reflect the new "fork-length" measurement.  As under current rules, a maximum size limit will be retained to protect large, breeding female sturgeon.

Under rules currently in effect for most waters of the state, anglers may retain only those white sturgeon with a total length of 42 to 60 inches. Under the new statewide rule, the new standard for legal-size sturgeon will be 38 to 54 inches, measured from a fish's snout to the fork in its tail.

The new 54-inch size maximum limit will be in effect statewide.  However, as under current rules, minimum size limits will vary from the 38-inch statewide standard on certain stretches of the Columbia and Snake rivers.  Effective Jan. 1, new size limits on those rivers will be as follows:

The mouth of the Columbia River upstream to Wauna powerlines near Cathlamet:  New fork-length limit is 38 to 54 inches through April 30.  (Old limit 45 to 60 inches.) 
The Dalles Dam upstream to Priest Rapids Dam on the Columbia River:  New fork-length limit is 43 inches to 54 inches. (Old limit 48 to 60 inches.)   
The Snake River upstream to Lower Granite Dam near the border with Idaho: New fork-length limit 43 to 54 inches.  (Old limit 48 to 60 inches.)
The new fork-length measurements will also take effect Jan. 1 for non-Indian commercial fisheries on the Columbia River.

While the Columbia River accounts for most white sturgeon caught in Washington state, James said the species is also the focus of active fisheries from northern Puget Sound to the bays and rivers along the Pacific Coast.

"Regardless of where people are fishing, these new size limits should make it easier for fishers to tell whether they should keep or release a fish," James said.

The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Bearhunter

  • Go in Lite come out Heavy!
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1994
  • Location: Sedro-Woolley
Re: New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit
« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2008, 08:21:27 PM »
That is a good rule to change.  Back when I used to Sturgeon fish a bunch, I was always worried if I got checked if the wardens and my perception of the length would differ.  Thankfully never got in that situation though.
Go in Lite come out Heavy!

Offline fc2038

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 1218
  • Location: Eatonville, Wa.
Re: New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit
« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2008, 08:38:40 PM »
I agree good rule change. You never know whan a warden is having a bad day. I have had a tendency to toss back the ones that were to close just for that reason.

Offline Hoytstaffshooter83

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 1208
  • Location: vancouver,wa
    • Great NW Rivers
Re: New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit
« Reply #3 on: December 23, 2008, 10:37:02 PM »
Personally I dont like it because it now limits the fish IMO that much more, I dont know about you guys but I have never had a issue measuring fish, hell I can look at one in the water and be within 1/2 in 99% of the time.... the problem I have with this is the top tail is not always the same length.. some have much longer tops, others short.. so if I land a fish that is 54.5 at the fork but only 59 at the tail now I have to let that beauty go!!   here is a example of just that these two are both 59.5 on the button.. they would be going back with this new rule...........

Offline cohoho

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 4202
  • Location: Black Diamond
  • Sturgeon Time Yet????
Re: New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit
« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2008, 10:39:03 PM »
Excellent, got stopped one time over on Oregon side, Warden kept talking about how we measured whether from laying him on the deck of the boat and measuring or holding by the tail and measuring, literally told us that you were supposed to lay them down, cause holding by the tail stretched the fish to the legal limit.  He was very nice about explaining why... It didn't matter in our case but, still didn't make any sense to me....  The fork way is great, thank Phool for posting....

Offline Antlershed

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4822
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit
« Reply #5 on: December 23, 2008, 11:23:12 PM »
I like the new rule. Essentially we will be keeping the same size fish, just an easier way to measure.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32895
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit
« Reply #6 on: December 23, 2008, 11:38:46 PM »
the problem I have with this is the top tail is not always the same length.. some have much longer tops, others short.. so if I land a fish that is 54.5 at the fork but only 59 at the tail now I have to let that beauty go!!   here is a example of just that these two are both 59.5 on the button.. they would be going back with this new rule...........

When you spend most of your time going after "oversize" this new retention rule shouldn't effect you much at all. Most dont have a problem measuring their fish its more about consistency and putting a end to the cheats that cut off an inch of tail or snub the snout.  With the old way the gamies said to do it, lift the tail and let it flop down then measure, you could flop it 5 times and get a different length with 3 of them, this will be much more accurate :twocents:

 Those are two nice fish right there :tup:
« Last Edit: December 23, 2008, 11:57:57 PM by huntnphool »
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline buckhorn2

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 3511
  • Location: grayland wa.
Re: New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit
« Reply #7 on: December 24, 2008, 09:58:29 AM »
I watched a two day jury trial on a white sturgeon that a lawyer made the wardens look dumb. The law read that the fish was to be measured in a natural free swimming position from the nose to the tip of the tail. First the defendents lawyer brought up a 5 foot 8 inch guy who weighed about 250 pounds. He asked him his hight and he said 5-8 then went from the top of his head following the conture of his body and he was then about the hight of abdul jabar. The lawyer ask the wardens who taught them to measure both said nobody then the lawyer said if you went to school and were taught to give tickets for measure things why were;nt you taught to measure. Also the wardens had drug the fish up the dock;froze it then drug it into the court room and let it thaw and they had expert testify that the fish could have stretched because of dragging and lifting it because they don;t have a backbone. Anyway the jury found him not guilty and the fish was about two inches over the size limit.

Offline rasbo

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 20144
  • Location: Grant county
  • In God I trust...Try taking that away from me!
Re: New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit
« Reply #8 on: December 24, 2008, 10:33:01 AM »
thats a much better way to measure,I like that change..Wow I found a change I like..I would like to bring two loggers up from calif to sturgeon fish,any good guides on here

Offline Hoytstaffshooter83

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 1208
  • Location: vancouver,wa
    • Great NW Rivers
Re: New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit
« Reply #9 on: December 24, 2008, 10:40:25 AM »
id be happy to take them out

Offline Hoytstaffshooter83

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 1208
  • Location: vancouver,wa
    • Great NW Rivers
Re: New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit
« Reply #10 on: December 24, 2008, 10:41:42 AM »
the problem I have with this is the top tail is not always the same length.. some have much longer tops, others short.. so if I land a fish that is 54.5 at the fork but only 59 at the tail now I have to let that beauty go!!   here is a example of just that these two are both 59.5 on the button.. they would be going back with this new rule...........

When you spend most of your time going after "oversize" this new retention rule shouldn't effect you much at all. Most dont have a problem measuring their fish its more about consistency and putting a end to the cheats that cut off an inch of tail or snub the snout.  With the old way the gamies said to do it, lift the tail and let it flop down then measure, you could flop it 5 times and get a different length with 3 of them, this will be much more accurate :twocents:

 Those are two nice fish right there :tup:
 


i spend just as much time keeper fishing.. actually more because of the times you can target oversize  may-july and august-oct   during that time you can keeper fish as well and then you have the rest of the year... I just like the big guys better

Offline Antlershed

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4822
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit
« Reply #11 on: December 24, 2008, 11:44:53 AM »
thats a much better way to measure,I like that change..Wow I found a change I like..I would like to bring two loggers up from calif to sturgeon fish,any good guides on here
If you want to fish the lower river, I would sugest Toby at Sidewinder Charters http://www.sidewindercharters.com/

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32895
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit
« Reply #12 on: December 24, 2008, 12:37:08 PM »
thats a much better way to measure,I like that change..Wow I found a change I like..I would like to bring two loggers up from calif to sturgeon fish,any good guides on here

Hoyt is a guide that gets loads of fish for his clients, and he is right here when not fishing, give him a call. :dunno:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Hoytstaffshooter83

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 1208
  • Location: vancouver,wa
    • Great NW Rivers
Re: New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit
« Reply #13 on: December 24, 2008, 05:58:27 PM »
thanks .. I love sturg thats all I can say..... couple days this fall

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32895
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: New Sturgeon Retention Size Limit
« Reply #14 on: December 24, 2008, 09:47:12 PM »
:yike: Holy crap, that last one on the left must be 59.99" Love the contrast the rain gear gives the pics

Here are a few
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

49 degrees north late Moose tag by Ridgerunner
[Today at 01:42:59 PM]


Video highlighting and discussing WDFW corruption by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 01:42:41 PM]


Archery elk gear, 2025. by High Climber
[Today at 01:35:58 PM]


Tease 'l' by kellama2001
[Today at 01:23:41 PM]


What barrel length 24”, 26” or 28” by Call em in
[Today at 12:47:43 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by addicted1
[Today at 12:38:05 PM]


PROOF RESEARCH CLOSEOUT by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 12:35:23 PM]


Article on the beaver trapping ban in OR by Humptulips
[Today at 12:27:08 PM]


SWAKANE EWE by elkoholic1
[Today at 12:09:52 PM]


Go kill some dogs! by fowl smacker
[Today at 11:27:32 AM]


Rimrock Bull: Modern by Ajmani84
[Today at 11:22:47 AM]


Athlon Rangecraft Chrono by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 11:09:00 AM]


June 26-27th WDFW Commission Meeting. Showing of sportsmen needed for Friday. by Docspud
[Today at 09:27:00 AM]


Pocket Carry by Macs B
[Today at 07:39:26 AM]


38% increase in fishing and hunting licenses by mikey549
[Today at 06:07:39 AM]


E scouting for bears by bear
[Today at 05:55:13 AM]


Herring anyone? by CastleRocker
[Yesterday at 09:42:53 PM]


Leupold Display fade by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 08:17:29 PM]


Minimum post count needed to view classifieds by Hucci
[Yesterday at 06:43:35 PM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Yesterday at 03:12:07 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal