collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Do you support this bill

Yes
No

Author Topic: HB 1261 Limiting Enforcement of Hunting Laws Against Tribal Members  (Read 11434 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
HB 1261 would limit the applicability of RCW 77.15 (fish and wildlife enforcement code) against tribal members on privately owned forest land if the following specifications are met:

(1) A person engaged in hunting on privately owned forest land is not subject to enforcement action under this chapter related to the hunting activities if:
(a)The person is a member of a tribe that has a right to hunt reserved by treaty or through other agreement with the United States;
(b)  The tribe has hunting regulations in place that apply to tribal member hunters accessing privately owned forest land;
(c)  The tribe has entered into a written access agreement with the private forest landowner and provided a copy of the agreement to the regional office of the department where the land is located;
(d)  The person has utilized the privately owned forest land consistent with the forest landowner's terms and conditions; and
(e)  The privately owned forest land is within the recognized territory that the tribe ceded to the United States or the established aboriginal hunting grounds of the tribe.
(2)  For purposes of this section, "forest land" and "forest landowner" have the same meanings as defined in RCW 76.09.020.
(3)  Nothing in this section or in private landowner access agreements referenced in this section may be construed to expand, define, or limit the rights of tribal members to hunt according to their treaty rights on private forest land. The legislature intends that this section narrowly authorize enforcement jurisdiction over hunting activities when the specific conditions outlined in subsection (1)of this section are met.
(4)Nothing in this section may be construed to limit the discretion of private forest landowners to allow access to tribal 11
members for hunting activities.
(5)  Nothing in this section affects the definition of "open and unclaimed lands" under tribal treaties.

Bill sponsors: Representatives Sawyer, Appleton, Stanford, and Pollet

http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2015-16/Pdf/Bills/House%20Bills/1261.pdf

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3043
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: HB 1261 Limiting Enforcement of Hunting Laws Against Tribal Members
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2015, 11:14:07 PM »
Well this can be viewed as a clarification (in a good way) and possibly not take an enforcement officers time.  I think the majority of the time this occurs (even if viewed as illegal) it is seldom, if ever, pursued by the legal system.  On the flip side it can be viewed as already illegal by the findings of Chambers.

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8686
  • Location: NCW
Re: HB 1261 Limiting Enforcement of Hunting Laws Against Tribal Members
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2015, 11:15:30 PM »
Hell no.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3043
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: HB 1261 Limiting Enforcement of Hunting Laws Against Tribal Members
« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2015, 11:17:42 PM »
Those voting no care to give reasons? 

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
Re: HB 1261 Limiting Enforcement of Hunting Laws Against Tribal Members
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2015, 11:20:04 PM »
Courts have said that a loaded firearm in a motor vehicle offense (RCW 77.15.460) is a public safety offense, not just a hunting offense. Because of this WDFW Officers can cite tribal members for having a loaded firearm in a motor vehicle.

If this law was to take effect, officers could no longer cite for an offense that the courts have said is okay to do so.

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19634
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: HB 1261 Limiting Enforcement of Hunting Laws Against Tribal Members
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2015, 11:20:42 PM »
A big F no, they already have a golden ticket to do what they want, the way I read this it gives them even more protection? If that's even possible! This must have been submitted by the tribal senator I'm guessing?
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19634
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: HB 1261 Limiting Enforcement of Hunting Laws Against Tribal Members
« Reply #6 on: January 16, 2015, 11:25:02 PM »
Courts have said that a loaded firearm in a motor vehicle offense (RCW 77.15.460) is a public safety offense, not just a hunting offense. Because of this WDFW Officers can cite tribal members for having a loaded firearm in a motor vehicle.

If this law was to take effect, officers could no longer cite for an offense that the courts have said is okay to do so.
Unreal, almost speechless.. Can't even believe what your telling us.  And how did this become even something to talk about as a new law???
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline mfswallace

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 2653
  • Location: where I be
Re: HB 1261 Limiting Enforcement of Hunting Laws Against Tribal Members
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2015, 11:26:10 PM »
Courts have said that a loaded firearm in a motor vehicle offense (RCW 77.15.460) is a public safety offense, not just a hunting offense. Because of this WDFW Officers can cite tribal members for having a loaded firearm in a motor vehicle.

If this law was to take effect, officers could no longer cite for an offense that the courts have said is okay to do so.
Unreal, almost speechless.. Can't even believe what your telling us.  And how did this become even something to talk about as a new law???
 

See this post

This must have been submitted by the tribal senator I'm guessing?
Rep. Sawyer is a Tulalip member

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19634
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: HB 1261 Limiting Enforcement of Hunting Laws Against Tribal Members
« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2015, 11:26:20 PM »
This must have been submitted by the tribal senator I'm guessing?
Rep. Sawyer is a Tulalip member
Not a senator but he was the guy I was thinking about. 
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3043
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: HB 1261 Limiting Enforcement of Hunting Laws Against Tribal Members
« Reply #9 on: January 16, 2015, 11:30:32 PM »
Bigtex,  would this eliminate state jurisdiction on public safety?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
Re: HB 1261 Limiting Enforcement of Hunting Laws Against Tribal Members
« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2015, 11:34:33 PM »
Bigtex,  would this eliminate state jurisdiction on public safety?
This law would be added to chapter RCW 77.15. As subsection 1 states "(1) A person engaged in hunting on privately owned forest land is not subject to enforcement action under this chapter related to the hunting activities if:"

So basically tribal members would be exempt from any law under RCW 77.15 if they are hunting in an area that meets the previously stated stipulations.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3043
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: HB 1261 Limiting Enforcement of Hunting Laws Against Tribal Members
« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2015, 11:36:13 PM »
Bigtex or any other natural resource LEO-
I know for fact this has been pursued.  Is there any actual cases that a RCW 77.15 (that wasn't a public safety issue) been successfully prosecuted when an agreement was reached with the landowner prior to the infraction?

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19634
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: HB 1261 Limiting Enforcement of Hunting Laws Against Tribal Members
« Reply #12 on: January 16, 2015, 11:41:55 PM »
Those voting no care to give reasons?
I'm curious why you are for it? If I'm reading you correctly?
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3043
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: HB 1261 Limiting Enforcement of Hunting Laws Against Tribal Members
« Reply #13 on: January 16, 2015, 11:51:54 PM »
Those voting no care to give reasons?
I'm curious why you are for it? If I'm reading you correctly?
I see this as clarification.  Like I said this has been investigated and argued by tribes vs state, it is also (as I, an outsider, see it) a point of contention amongst the ranks of the WDFW.  If you commit a field officer to investigate and process a case, you expect a conviction (correct? ). If past is an indicator, you are not getting desired results, even evidence to the contrary. 

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3043
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: HB 1261 Limiting Enforcement of Hunting Laws Against Tribal Members
« Reply #14 on: January 17, 2015, 12:03:27 AM »
Industrial timberlands are quite complex and constantly in a state of change.  I think you will be hard pressed to get a jury conviction when you have an area, even if interpreted as a violation of Chambers,  that is turned into a grey area in a hurry.  When you have established access agreements it muddles views even more.  This bill could provide clarification.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Yard bucks by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 11:20:39 PM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Yesterday at 10:04:54 PM]


Pocket Carry by bb76
[Yesterday at 08:44:00 PM]


Seeking recommendations on a new scope by coachg
[Yesterday at 08:10:21 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 08:06:05 PM]


Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 07:58:22 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 07:07:33 PM]


MOVED: Seekins Element 7PRC for sale by Bob33
[Yesterday at 06:57:10 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 04:44:03 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 04:37:55 PM]


A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Yesterday at 03:21:14 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Yesterday at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Yesterday at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Yesterday at 08:24:48 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Yesterday at 06:35:57 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[July 03, 2025, 09:02:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[July 03, 2025, 05:42:19 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal