collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Are you in favor?

Yes
No

Author Topic: SB 5500 Would Allow Retired WA LEOs to Carry Guns on School Property  (Read 13845 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
SB 5500 sponsored by Senators Roach, Angel, Bailey, Warnick, Honeyford, Dansel, Parlette, and Padden would allow retired WA law enforcement officers to carry firearms on school grounds.

http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2015-16/Pdf/Bills/Senate%20Bills/5500.pdf

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: SB 5500 Would Allow Retired WA LEOs to Carry Guns on School Property
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2015, 09:29:33 AM »
I support it - but I would like to see anyone eligible able to carry concealed allowed to carry on school property.  I believe it would be a net gain in school safety. 
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

Offline ctwiggs1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 4221
Re: SB 5500 Would Allow Retired WA LEOs to Carry Guns on School Property
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2015, 11:01:35 AM »
LOL figures - that has Roach all over it.

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45233
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: SB 5500 Would Allow Retired WA LEOs to Carry Guns on School Property
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2015, 11:02:58 AM »
Everyone should be allowed.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline ctwiggs1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 4221
Re: SB 5500 Would Allow Retired WA LEOs to Carry Guns on School Property
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2015, 11:03:49 AM »
agreed

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25060
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: SB 5500 Would Allow Retired WA LEOs to Carry Guns on School Property
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2015, 11:12:36 AM »
Since the signs dont stop bad guys, may as well let retired cops carry. I agree that anyone with a CC permit shoudl be allowed as well.
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline bowbuild

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 835
  • Location: Elma, wa.
Re: SB 5500 Would Allow Retired WA LEOs to Carry Guns on School Property
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2015, 01:33:45 PM »
Voted NO! They wearing a banner when entering school grounds??  :bash: :bash:If they won't allow teachers to carry, then ex-cops not easily identified should not be exempt.

Offline magnanimous_j

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 8659
Re: SB 5500 Would Allow Retired WA LEOs to Carry Guns on School Property
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2015, 01:35:53 PM »
How many people would this bill possibly effect?

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45233
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: SB 5500 Would Allow Retired WA LEOs to Carry Guns on School Property
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2015, 01:44:02 PM »
Voted NO! They wearing a banner when entering school grounds??  :bash: :bash:If they won't allow teachers to carry, then ex-cops not easily identified should not be exempt.

So fewer guns is better then.  :dunno: Your reasoning is questionable. Although I agree with you that teachers should be able to carry (as a matter of my personal opinion, I believe everyone should be able to carry in a school), just because they can't doesn't mean we should eliminate others who should be allowed. The more people who are allowed to carry firearms in our schools the greater the chance an active shooter event can be interrupted and/or stopped. I think that retired officers are being considered in this bill because of past experience and that they're the ones likely to get hired into a security position.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Online CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7196
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: SB 5500 Would Allow Retired WA LEOs to Carry Guns on School Property
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2015, 01:50:27 PM »
How many people would this bill possibly effect?

Everyone that attends or works at a school.

Offline bowbuild

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 835
  • Location: Elma, wa.
Re: SB 5500 Would Allow Retired WA LEOs to Carry Guns on School Property
« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2015, 03:06:50 PM »
Voted NO! They wearing a banner when entering school grounds??  :bash: :bash:If they won't allow teachers to carry, then ex-cops not easily identified should not be exempt.

So fewer guns is better then.  :dunno: Your reasoning is questionable. Although I agree with you that teachers should be able to carry (as a matter of my personal opinion, I believe everyone should be able to carry in a school), just because they can't doesn't mean we should eliminate others who should be allowed. The more people who are allowed to carry firearms in our schools the greater the chance an active shooter event can be interrupted and/or stopped. I think that retired officers are being considered in this bill because of past experience and that they're the ones likely to get hired into a security position.

Really?? So some man/woman is seen carrying a gun on campus, the mere site of the gun sets the wheels in motion of "shooter" on campus and staff respond, with calls to police, and kids panic...so, what is unrealistic about that. We have seen numerous responses recently by police that have no ended well, because of perception.......If I were a officer, I would want easy to understand clear cut rules.....exceptions are problems waiting to happen.

I would go so far as to say ONLY UNIFORMED officers are to respond to calls at a school campus, easier to know a real shooter from someone that is not a threat. Would agree with uniformed security with weopons.


Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14559
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: SB 5500 Would Allow Retired WA LEOs to Carry Guns on School Property
« Reply #11 on: January 22, 2015, 03:20:26 PM »
I can think of a WDFW officer that I wouldn't mind seeing retired and wouldn't want given special treatment for anything--packing in/around schools being one.

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45233
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: SB 5500 Would Allow Retired WA LEOs to Carry Guns on School Property
« Reply #12 on: January 22, 2015, 03:57:52 PM »
Voted NO! They wearing a banner when entering school grounds??  :bash: :bash:If they won't allow teachers to carry, then ex-cops not easily identified should not be exempt.

So fewer guns is better then.  :dunno: Your reasoning is questionable. Although I agree with you that teachers should be able to carry (as a matter of my personal opinion, I believe everyone should be able to carry in a school), just because they can't doesn't mean we should eliminate others who should be allowed. The more people who are allowed to carry firearms in our schools the greater the chance an active shooter event can be interrupted and/or stopped. I think that retired officers are being considered in this bill because of past experience and that they're the ones likely to get hired into a security position.

Really?? So some man/woman is seen carrying a gun on campus, the mere site of the gun sets the wheels in motion of "shooter" on campus and staff respond, with calls to police, and kids panic...so, what is unrealistic about that. We have seen numerous responses recently by police that have no ended well, because of perception.......If I were a officer, I would want easy to understand clear cut rules.....exceptions are problems waiting to happen.

I would go so far as to say ONLY UNIFORMED officers are to respond to calls at a school campus, easier to know a real shooter from someone that is not a threat. Would agree with uniformed security with weopons.

Yes really. First of all, if the restrictions were dropped, people would know that someone carrying isn't necessarily a bad thing. And, even if they didn't and called it in, there's no harm, no foul. I'd rather have a false alarm called in than no ability at all to repel an active shooter. Presently, there's no ability unless an active duty cop is stationed at the school. Secondly, we're talking about most people still being in their cars or carrying concealed. It's ridiculous I can't have my firearm while I'm waiting in the parking lot to pick-up my daughter. It's ridiculous that teachers can't carry. Hundreds of thousands of people carry everyday around children all over the country and they aren't having accidents or shooting them. A school would be no different. It would certainly be a safer place than one where a madman knows he can kill unopposed.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline NW-GSP

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 2727
Re: SB 5500 Would Allow Retired WA LEOs to Carry Guns on School Property
« Reply #13 on: January 22, 2015, 05:21:17 PM »
Keep in mind that current LEO and Corrections Officers have the ability to carry on school grounds now, so those of you that think that only uniformed Officers should carry on campus need to realize that there are already people conceal carrying on school grounds. 

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: SB 5500 Would Allow Retired WA LEOs to Carry Guns on School Property
« Reply #14 on: January 22, 2015, 06:02:10 PM »
I'm not in favor of the general public carrying on school grounds, the fiasco in the legislature chamber is a good example why.  No training is required to carry concealed.  I'm not in favor of teachers carrying concealed unless they have mandatory training.


Retired LE has been trained for years, 20+ years.  This is a step in the right direction to ending gun free zones in schools.  I would add that I'd like to see them able to carry on school grounds provided they meet all the conditions of LEOSA, in fact it could just simply be tagged on to LEOSA nationally.


baby steps - last thing I want to see is a bunch of armed folks tramping around the school grounds like they did in the legislature recently.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Elk Outfitter in Elbe, WA by Buckhunter24
[Today at 03:25:45 PM]


Rimrock Bull: Modern by Craig
[Today at 03:20:28 PM]


Talking About Barely Legal by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 03:05:57 PM]


Daughters doubled up before 8am by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 03:03:02 PM]


Duck Boat Blind by gallion_t
[Today at 02:59:14 PM]


49 DN Moose Success by bearhunter99
[Today at 02:57:24 PM]


2025 opener by metlhead
[Today at 02:56:05 PM]


As He Lay by hoytxl2009
[Today at 02:45:55 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by ellensburgpo
[Today at 02:19:46 PM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 01:59:09 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by CarbonHunter
[Today at 01:43:51 PM]


Yukon wolf by starbailey
[Today at 01:11:46 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by goosehunter12
[Today at 12:55:31 PM]


Displaced Hunting Camps? by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 10:49:57 AM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 08:43:13 AM]


climbing stick users by MeepDog
[Today at 08:11:01 AM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by bighorns2bushytails
[Today at 05:45:32 AM]


Looking for grouse hunting or pheasant hunting friend by ChrisCox4912
[Today at 01:40:54 AM]


Quality tag by Romulus1297
[Yesterday at 11:51:27 PM]


Japanese Kei truck? by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 10:16:44 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal