collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Are you in favor of this bill?

Yes
No

Author Topic: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property  (Read 43186 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10635
Re: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property
« Reply #30 on: January 31, 2015, 08:14:55 PM »
All about extraction of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
:yeah:  The creative minds of wdfw working on sources of revenue.............its all about revenue.
This was brought forward by a random Republican Representative NOT WDFW.

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6068
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
Re: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property
« Reply #31 on: February 01, 2015, 07:02:11 AM »
Someone needs to tell the legislators that there's free food, alcohol, and sex in Syria so they'll leave this state and quit trying to steal our money!
:yeah: :chuckle: :mor:
Don't remember blaming DFW exclusively....... :chuckle:
« Last Edit: February 01, 2015, 07:08:14 AM by Elkaholic daWg »
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline floatinghat

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 696
Re: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property
« Reply #32 on: February 02, 2015, 07:23:12 AM »
If there is no additional penalty, how does this differ from basic trespassing?
Exactly....

said it for me

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10635
Re: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property
« Reply #33 on: February 23, 2015, 10:00:25 PM »
On February 19th the House Natural Resource Committee voted unanimously in favor of this bill.

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property
« Reply #34 on: February 26, 2015, 03:20:31 PM »
I thought the public had voting rights, WTF ! They come up will these stupid laws, no matter what side you're on and vote this crap in without public input.............


How about some good 'ol back alley justice, instead of another *censored* law to generate revenue for the state. God I hate this state....
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10635
Re: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property
« Reply #35 on: February 26, 2015, 04:13:43 PM »
I thought the public had voting rights, WTF ! They come up will these stupid laws, no matter what side you're on and vote this crap in without public input.............


How about some good 'ol back alley justice, instead of another *censored* law to generate revenue for the state. God I hate this state....
As far as I know your in Joel Kretz's district, Kretz voted in favor of this bill.

People can provide public input. There were no citizens that spoke in opposition to this bill at it's hearing.

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property
« Reply #36 on: February 26, 2015, 04:19:26 PM »
I thought the public had voting rights, WTF ! They come up will these stupid laws, no matter what side you're on and vote this crap in without public input.............


How about some good 'ol back alley justice, instead of another *censored* law to generate revenue for the state. God I hate this state....
As far as I know your in Joel Kretz's district, Kretz voted in favor of this bill.

People can provide public input. There were no citizens that spoke in opposition to this bill at it's hearing.



I am in Kretzs district. I noticed his wolf bill got shot down without any vote too. I still think it's a dumb law.

Public input doesn't mean much nowadays bigtex. I think we all know that.
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10635
Re: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property
« Reply #37 on: March 10, 2015, 08:09:24 PM »
Yesterday the bill passed the House with unanimous support.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25043
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property
« Reply #38 on: March 11, 2015, 09:32:59 PM »
Another worthless bill that makes legislators feel good that they did something...

Thanks for keeping us abreast to issues Big Tex.
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline mfswallace

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 2653
  • Location: where I be
Re: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property
« Reply #39 on: March 11, 2015, 09:43:16 PM »
Another worthless bill that makes legislators feel good that they did something...

Thanks for keeping us abreast to issues Big Tex.

This does seem like money wasted  :bash:

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10635
Re: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property
« Reply #40 on: March 11, 2015, 09:48:00 PM »
The common question regarding this bill is how is it different then a basic trespass charge?

The penalties for this offense and criminal trespass 2nd degree are exactly the same.

The only thing that this offense would do is count towards fishing/hunting license suspension. Right now if your removing sheds from private property and are convicted of criminal trespass 2nd degree it does not impact fishing/hunting licenses. If this bill were to pass you could be charged under this law, if you were convicted it would count as a fish and wildlife conviction and if you obtain 2/3 fish and wildlife convictions within a 10 year period your license is suspended for 2 years.

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property
« Reply #41 on: March 11, 2015, 09:56:30 PM »
this bill needs to die!  It is another attempt to privatize wildlife.    You are either trespassing or not!  Under this bill you could have to pay to shed hunt.  So if you are big timber you can charge varying rate.  Say $100 for walk-in and if you want to pick up sheds than it is $200!

Just say no!

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 16026
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property
« Reply #42 on: March 12, 2015, 07:16:58 AM »
this bill needs to die!  It is another attempt to privatize wildlife.    You are either trespassing or not!  Under this bill you could have to pay to shed hunt.  So if you are big timber you can charge varying rate.  Say $100 for walk-in and if you want to pick up sheds than it is $200!

Just say no!
So if your not a big timber company, just a small guy like me with 100 acres between winter ground and spring habitat it should just be a free for all on my property?  Well, free for all except for me, I still have to pay the taxes on my place.  I have to go to work to pay those taxes and these guys can go to my place during the week and pick up the sheds.  It's fun spending a weekend on your own little piece of heaven with your kids looking at some other guy's boot tracks and not finding a single shed.
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44853
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property
« Reply #43 on: March 12, 2015, 07:27:36 AM »
The common question regarding this bill is how is it different then a basic trespass charge?

The penalties for this offense and criminal trespass 2nd degree are exactly the same.

The only thing that this offense would do is count towards fishing/hunting license suspension. Right now if your removing sheds from private property and are convicted of criminal trespass 2nd degree it does not impact fishing/hunting licenses. If this bill were to pass you could be charged under this law, if you were convicted it would count as a fish and wildlife conviction and if you obtain 2/3 fish and wildlife convictions within a 10 year period your license is suspended for 2 years.

It would also be in addition to a trespassing charge, wouldn't it? And like the trespassing charge, wouldn't fly in court if the land isn't posted and the "picker" hadn't been previously warned off the property? If so, I don't have a problem with this bill. We shouldn't have unfettered access to someone's private land and the resources thereon, especially if we know it's private.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: HB 1627 Unlawful Removal of Wildlife Parts from Private Property
« Reply #44 on: March 12, 2015, 08:57:27 AM »
The common question regarding this bill is how is it different then a basic trespass charge?

The penalties for this offense and criminal trespass 2nd degree are exactly the same.

The only thing that this offense would do is count towards fishing/hunting license suspension. Right now if your removing sheds from private property and are convicted of criminal trespass 2nd degree it does not impact fishing/hunting licenses. If this bill were to pass you could be charged under this law, if you were convicted it would count as a fish and wildlife conviction and if you obtain 2/3 fish and wildlife convictions within a 10 year period your license is suspended for 2 years.

does everyone who hunts sheds have to have a hunting license?  I don't think so, so this law provides different levels of punishment for license holders and non-license holders.  SAround here the tweekers do anything they can to get a buck--collect metal, pick agets, and I'm sure horn hunting is on their list of ways to pay for a fix.  Doubt they have hunting licenses.  The bill sounds fishy in a legal sense--two punishments for same offense depending if the person has a hunting license or not..

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Browning X Bolt sticky stock by JKEEN33
[Today at 01:31:06 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by CNELK
[Today at 01:09:43 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by tdot24
[Today at 12:37:30 PM]


2025 Area 9 King Opener by CP
[Today at 11:53:21 AM]


Bonaparte Lake by TeacherMan
[Today at 10:17:00 AM]


Pocket Carry by hookr88
[Today at 09:48:30 AM]


Grouse in Vail? by Alan K
[Today at 09:28:46 AM]


Rabbits looking good so far! by Goshawk
[Today at 09:16:08 AM]


Game scouting in Vail for 2025. Not looking too good so far. by Goshawk
[Today at 09:04:01 AM]


Raffle ticket sales 2025 by JDArms1240
[Today at 06:12:34 AM]


Area 11 2025 - Well? by trophyhunt
[Today at 05:59:13 AM]


Good day of steelhead fishing! by huntnphool
[Yesterday at 10:49:23 PM]


8 year old attacked in 2023 ooops by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 08:32:17 PM]


Live bait albacore charter by hiway_99
[Yesterday at 07:10:28 PM]


Seeking packer OnCall for early archery unit 328 Naneum/Colockum by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 06:53:06 PM]


Surprise quality deer tag by Gentrys
[Yesterday at 06:01:07 PM]


Antelope next year? by Stein
[Yesterday at 05:52:08 PM]


New to bear hunting by ZaneHunts
[Yesterday at 05:35:10 PM]


Idaho unit 5 2025. Nov-ish by leonpeon2
[Yesterday at 03:42:59 PM]


3 pintails by hdshot
[Yesterday at 02:16:04 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal