Free: Contests & Raffles.
IDFG has done a great job with the hand they were dealt. Also the predator and habitat issues are not mutually exclusive. I get that the facts don't fit the hysteria you frequently try to peddle, so why don't you tell us who you would like to have seen hired as director if Unsworth is such a bad choice?
Quote from: idahohuntr on January 30, 2015, 01:06:37 PMIDFG has done a great job with the hand they were dealt. Also the predator and habitat issues are not mutually exclusive. I get that the facts don't fit the hysteria you frequently try to peddle, so why don't you tell us who you would like to have seen hired as director if Unsworth is such a bad choice?Wolfbait won't answer that question. I already asked him.
Quote from: Sitka_Blacktail on February 01, 2015, 08:48:16 PMQuote from: idahohuntr on January 30, 2015, 01:06:37 PMIDFG has done a great job with the hand they were dealt. Also the predator and habitat issues are not mutually exclusive. I get that the facts don't fit the hysteria you frequently try to peddle, so why don't you tell us who you would like to have seen hired as director if Unsworth is such a bad choice?Wolfbait won't answer that question. I already asked him.It's a stupid question. Hunter etc. will never get a legitimate WDFW directer as long as the current administration is in charge, we need changes from the top down starting with the governor.
Quote from: wolfbait on February 01, 2015, 09:19:09 PMQuote from: Sitka_Blacktail on February 01, 2015, 08:48:16 PMQuote from: idahohuntr on January 30, 2015, 01:06:37 PMIDFG has done a great job with the hand they were dealt. Also the predator and habitat issues are not mutually exclusive. I get that the facts don't fit the hysteria you frequently try to peddle, so why don't you tell us who you would like to have seen hired as director if Unsworth is such a bad choice?Wolfbait won't answer that question. I already asked him.It's a stupid question. Hunter etc. will never get a legitimate WDFW directer as long as the current administration is in charge, we need changes from the top down starting with the governor.And now we get to the just of Wolfbait's whole argument. "There aren't any legitimate candidates" So he is justified trashing anyone who gets the job, regardless of what their credentials are, their training, what they are capable of, and how good of a job they do.How about this. We make you, Wolfbait, Governor of Washington. You hand pick your wildlife commission. Now who do they pick for the Director of WDFW?
Quote from: Sitka_Blacktail on February 02, 2015, 06:15:34 AMQuote from: wolfbait on February 01, 2015, 09:19:09 PMQuote from: Sitka_Blacktail on February 01, 2015, 08:48:16 PMQuote from: idahohuntr on January 30, 2015, 01:06:37 PMIDFG has done a great job with the hand they were dealt. Also the predator and habitat issues are not mutually exclusive. I get that the facts don't fit the hysteria you frequently try to peddle, so why don't you tell us who you would like to have seen hired as director if Unsworth is such a bad choice?Wolfbait won't answer that question. I already asked him.It's a stupid question. Hunter etc. will never get a legitimate WDFW directer as long as the current administration is in charge, we need changes from the top down starting with the governor.And now we get to the just of Wolfbait's whole argument. "There aren't any legitimate candidates" So he is justified trashing anyone who gets the job, regardless of what their credentials are, their training, what they are capable of, and how good of a job they do.How about this. We make you, Wolfbait, Governor of Washington. You hand pick your wildlife commission. Now who do they pick for the Director of WDFW?This definitely highlights his desire to only be a critic and complainer and not provide solutions to complex problems.
Quote from: idahohuntr on February 02, 2015, 06:25:10 PMQuote from: Sitka_Blacktail on February 02, 2015, 06:15:34 AMQuote from: wolfbait on February 01, 2015, 09:19:09 PMQuote from: Sitka_Blacktail on February 01, 2015, 08:48:16 PMQuote from: idahohuntr on January 30, 2015, 01:06:37 PMIDFG has done a great job with the hand they were dealt. Also the predator and habitat issues are not mutually exclusive. I get that the facts don't fit the hysteria you frequently try to peddle, so why don't you tell us who you would like to have seen hired as director if Unsworth is such a bad choice?Wolfbait won't answer that question. I already asked him.It's a stupid question. Hunter etc. will never get a legitimate WDFW directer as long as the current administration is in charge, we need changes from the top down starting with the governor.And now we get to the just of Wolfbait's whole argument. "There aren't any legitimate candidates" So he is justified trashing anyone who gets the job, regardless of what their credentials are, their training, what they are capable of, and how good of a job they do.How about this. We make you, Wolfbait, Governor of Washington. You hand pick your wildlife commission. Now who do they pick for the Director of WDFW?This definitely highlights his desire to only be a critic and complainer and not provide solutions to complex problems. why are we talking about wolfbait instead of Idahos thriving wolf numbers? Isn't this the same thing you complain about ID? Your infamous quote is coming to mind
IDFG has done a great job with the hand they were dealt. Also the predator and habitat issues are not mutually exclusive. If folks want to make every wolf topic a referendum on Jim Unsworth...then I think its fair to ask who should have been hired as director. If they don't want to answer the simple question then I find it appropriate to point out while some constantly complain about Unsworth they are not providing a viable candidate who should have been hired. I also don't have a lot of patience for those who attack public servants in false and misinformed ways as some on this forum are very prone to do.
If folks want to make every wolf topic a referendum on Jim Unsworth...then I think its fair to ask who should have been hired as director. If they don't want to answer the simple question then I find it appropriate to point out while some constantly complain about Unsworth they are not providing a viable candidate who should have been hired.
Quote from: idahohuntr on February 02, 2015, 10:36:24 PM If folks want to make every wolf topic a referendum on Jim Unsworth...then I think its fair to ask who should have been hired as director. If they don't want to answer the simple question then I find it appropriate to point out while some constantly complain about Unsworth they are not providing a viable candidate who should have been hired. I think that is an interesting question. Im not sure how many other people have western states experience AND would be willing to move to Washington. I would argue that most of the people we NEED would be unwilling to leave they state they are working in to come to a department with VERY low staff morale, and the political situation we have in this state.[/quoteVery well said Special T. Everything about this state stinks. I'm putting my house up for sale in the spring and getting the hell out of here.