collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Mucks vs lacrosse  (Read 7136 times)

Offline n_mathews13

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Posts: 1309
  • Location: E. WA
Mucks vs lacrosse
« on: January 29, 2015, 06:36:06 AM »
Need to get a pair of rubber boots for my spring bear hunt in AK. Anyone got an opinion on what boot is better? Mucks vs lacrosse.

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: Mucks vs lacrosse
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2015, 07:15:36 AM »
Following
275 down 2

Offline 92xj

  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 4019
  • Location: Out of Place
  • Kill 'em
Re: Mucks vs lacrosse
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2015, 07:18:07 AM »
I've been wearing muck for the past 16 years ish and have yet to be forced to look else where. No experience with the lacrosse simply because the muck has never failed me.
"If you have to be crazy to hunt ducks, I do not wish to be sane."

Offline n_mathews13

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Posts: 1309
  • Location: E. WA
Re: Mucks vs lacrosse
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2015, 07:20:19 AM »
You walk a lot in them? Do they breath good enough?

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19599
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Mucks vs lacrosse
« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2015, 07:23:39 AM »
You walk a lot in them? Do they breath good enough?
I walk in my mucks a long ways, I love them but my feet sweat a bunch and the neoprene(prob spelled wrong) material does not breath.  Very comfortable boot to walk in.
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline 92xj

  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 4019
  • Location: Out of Place
  • Kill 'em
Re: Mucks vs lacrosse
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2015, 07:25:55 AM »
I walk a ton in them. Breath, no. They are rubber and neoprene. No brand of that material will breath. What I absolutely love about them is that they fold in half and allow the hot air to escape out the top. I wear them folded down 90% of the time then pop them up at water crossings, wet grass, etc. I use a silk sock liner and the thinnest smart wool hiking sock, from summer to late winter and have hiked 8ish miles in a day in them. Not the best hiking boot but was comfortable and was able to do the same hike the next day.
"If you have to be crazy to hunt ducks, I do not wish to be sane."

Offline Firedogg

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2014
  • Posts: 987
  • Location: Eatonville
Re: Mucks vs lacrosse
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2015, 02:55:00 PM »
Costco in Puyallup had one style of Mucks on tbe shelf. I tried them on and they were comfortable, too bad I don't need new boots right now or I may have bought them.
There is no greater respect to have for wildlife than to harvest an animal fairly and use it's flesh to feed your family.  ~me

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: Mucks vs lacrosse
« Reply #7 on: January 31, 2015, 11:14:19 PM »
I have a pair of Muck boots that I love.  Very comfortable, dry and warm  Durable, too.  I've never worn a Lacrosse boot of the same type, so can't say anything there.  I do have Lacrosse old fashioned rubber boots and neoprene waders, though.  They're good quality.

Offline BigGoonTuna

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 2417
  • Location: Yelm
Re: Mucks vs lacrosse
« Reply #8 on: February 01, 2015, 04:39:12 AM »
i think some have gone away from mucks due to their political affiliations...

i've owned a pair for about 5 years, the woody max.  great cold weather boots, not so good in anything above 50 degrees though, your feet will roast off if you have to move around much.
you can still get gas in heaven, and a drink in kingdom come,
in the meantime, i'll be cleaning my gun

Offline goosegetter79

  • YAR Member
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1624
  • Location: Bainville, MT
Re: Mucks vs lacrosse
« Reply #9 on: February 01, 2015, 07:50:06 AM »
Can't comment on lacrosse but after moving to NE Montana 2 years ago I bought a pair of arctic mucks. Comfortable and warm, wore them for 3 weeks straight a month ago when we had -20 days. Like was said before tho they don't breathe well but fold them down in half and they will breathe better if need.
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" -Edmund Burke

Offline TommyH

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 2098
  • Location: Eastside
Re: Mucks vs lacrosse
« Reply #10 on: February 01, 2015, 08:42:05 AM »
I have some of the cabelas ( not sure which model) and they are great when it's cold out but u will sweat in them. I wear mine fishing in icy creeks, snow machining, work. There good boots. Only problem I can see is they are not totally puncture proof . I think they were like 150 @ cabelas.

Offline n_mathews13

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Posts: 1309
  • Location: E. WA
Re: Mucks vs lacrosse
« Reply #11 on: February 05, 2015, 01:03:32 PM »
 thanks for the info. Lacrosse fits kinda narrow on my foot

Offline bearhunter99

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+35)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 3149
  • Location: Monitor
Re: Mucks vs lacrosse
« Reply #12 on: February 05, 2015, 01:49:30 PM »
I would add Boggs to the list. Great warranty on them.
:yeah:
I absolutely love my Bogs!  Extremely comfortable and if I remember right they were cheaper than Mucks.  Bogs warranty can't be beat either.  I would recommend checking them out as well.

More info:
http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,108032.msg1411632.html#msg1411632
« Last Edit: February 05, 2015, 02:02:30 PM by bearhunter99 »
RIP Colockumelk   :salute:

"We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm." – Winston Churchill



Genesis 27:3
Now therefore take, I pray thee, thy weapons, thy quiver and thy bow, and go out to the field, and take me some venison

Offline Cylvertip

  • Conservative Heathen
  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 1698
  • Location: Granite Falls by way of Rainier/ Tenino and Dixon, MO
  • Lifetime Member WSTA & NRA
Re: Mucks vs lacrosse
« Reply #13 on: February 10, 2015, 06:30:59 PM »
Alaska Sneakers   - the quality issue they had when they moved manufacturing over seas a couple of years ago has been resolved.  They are the unofficial Alaska State Boot afte all.  I have  both insulated and non-insulated.  Very comfortable to wear and the insulated are darn warm, but still comfortable to 50 degrees or so. the non-insulated are for the rest of the year when it's wet out.  They are not nearly as stiff as the mucks.   AKA 16" XtraTufs :twocents:
May that for which I prepare never come to pass.
Don't Tread On Me!

Offline SemperFidelis97

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 2265
  • Location: Graham
Re: Mucks vs lacrosse
« Reply #14 on: February 10, 2015, 06:36:41 PM »
Under Armor makes a muck style boot as well I have had mucks, bogs, and the under armor ones the under armor have been the most comfortable.  I will say all have been great boots.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal