Free: Contests & Raffles.
Idahohuntr is a new age biologist trained recently, enough said for the education system
Quote from: mfswallace on April 02, 2015, 02:03:27 PMIdahohuntr is a new age biologist trained recently, enough said for the education system
Below is some info. you should probably read if you plan on staying with the wolf topic.
Quote from: wolfbait on April 02, 2015, 01:48:56 PMBelow is some info. you should probably read if you plan on staying with the wolf topic. No thanks. I'm not really interested in reading fiction.
It's funny how Idaho hunter always claims that wolfbait is speeding lies and false information yet he never presents any evidence to support his claims. Only offers his opinion on its credibility and refuses to even read or except anything other than his opinions and what game departments claim. Personally I've seen a lot of corruption and lack of transparentcy in wdfw, idfg and f&g. This whole wolf introduction has been nothing but a disaster from day one! Call it conspericy if you want but there is deff more to this whole thing than just wanting wolves back in the USA. No state game agency has been 100% honest or transparent about wolf issues.
Quote from: idahohuntr on April 02, 2015, 05:44:01 PMQuote from: wolfbait on April 02, 2015, 01:48:56 PMBelow is some info. you should probably read if you plan on staying with the wolf topic. No thanks. I'm not really interested in reading fiction.Yep, that's about what I figured you would say. People like you are the reason we had the wolf introduction, you ignore past history in support of the environmentalists fairy tales and their agendas.
It's funny how Idaho hunter always claims that wolfbait is speeding lies and false information yet he never presents any evidence to support his claims. Only offers his opinion on its credibility and refuses to even read or except anything other than his opinions and what game departments claim.
Quote from: mountainman on April 02, 2015, 04:48:32 PMQuote from: mfswallace on April 02, 2015, 02:03:27 PMIdahohuntr is a new age biologist trained recently, enough said for the education system
Quote from: wolfbait on April 02, 2015, 06:06:16 PMQuote from: idahohuntr on April 02, 2015, 05:44:01 PMQuote from: wolfbait on April 02, 2015, 01:48:56 PMBelow is some info. you should probably read if you plan on staying with the wolf topic. No thanks. I'm not really interested in reading fiction.Yep, that's about what I figured you would say. People like you are the reason we had the wolf introduction, you ignore past history in support of the environmentalists fairy tales and their agendas.I've never supported wolf re-introduction and I don't support environmentalist fairy tales. Your preferred method of matching the environmentalists lie for lie is what I oppose. I wish all the fringe on both sides of this issue...you and the rest of the zealot anti-wolfers, as well as the fringe tree huggers on the other side, would just stop with the ridiculous claims and exaggerations and campaigns of misinformation. Most reasonably informed individuals can see through the garbage and bs, but to the middle 80% of voters who don't invest a lot of time understanding the issue, its unfortunate they are bombarded with so many lies from both sides. Quote from: jasnt on April 02, 2015, 07:20:37 PMIt's funny how Idaho hunter always claims that wolfbait is speeding lies and false information yet he never presents any evidence to support his claims. Only offers his opinion on its credibility and refuses to even read or except anything other than his opinions and what game departments claim. jasnt- its impossible to prove a negative...like wolves were not transplanted by WDFW. This is why tinfoil hat conspiracy theorists love conjuring up crap like that. Prove to me that WDFW did not plant Elvis in the cascades. I know I saw them. My UPS guy's cousin saw Dave Ware load Elvis into a horsetrailer and drop him off. Prove me wrong. And don't just offer your opinion on the credibility of the information. And don't refuse to read the articles in the National Enquirer just because you think they might be exaggerating to make a $$.