collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Bill calls for relocating wolves to Cascades, Western Wash.  (Read 38577 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
Re: Bill calls for relocating wolves to Cascades, Western Wash.
« Reply #105 on: March 31, 2015, 12:31:25 PM »


Actually it's the sue and settle of environmentalists and the USFWS plus having an environmental judge that determines how long before any wolf control/management transpires, we have already seen this in ID, MT, and Wyoming.

The environmentalists and the USFWS along with WDFW already have everything worked out a head of time, remember the fake wolf meetings before the faulty wolf plan was implemented?


Offline rim_runner

  • Not all those who wander are lost
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 105
  • Location: Dewey, Az
Re: Bill calls for relocating wolves to Cascades, Western Wash.
« Reply #106 on: March 31, 2015, 12:41:38 PM »
Is SSS unethical or is it just illegal?  :dunno:  Some people might say it's unethical NOT to shoot a wolf.  :dunno:  Ethics is doing what is right and the law doesn't always align with what's right.

Tree huggers use a similar thought process when they spike trees, They may think they are doing the right thing but I sure don't.

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
Re: Bill calls for relocating wolves to Cascades, Western Wash.
« Reply #107 on: April 02, 2015, 06:00:17 PM »
Tree's have killed a house or two, but I have never heard of them running down and killing livestock. Pretty big difference if you are raising cattle etc. and have wolves dumped on you.


Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3391
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: Bill calls for relocating wolves to Cascades, Western Wash.
« Reply #108 on: April 02, 2015, 06:25:53 PM »
I understand where your coming from but I don't think it really matter s God bless the constitution.
You’re wrong! It’s not the hunters or the anti-hunters who will decide the fate of hunting. It’s the non-hunters who have the number of votes to decide this. The anti-hunters understand this and they are constantly trying to portray us to the non-hunters in the worse possible light. It wouldn’t surprise me at all to see your comments copied to an anti-hunting site suggesting that this proves all hunters have no regard for ethics or any qualms about causing an animal to suffer needlessly.   

If there was a way to rep you for your comment, I would. You see the big picture.
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Knight ridge runner by riverrun
[Today at 09:47:51 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Today at 08:54:26 PM]


1oz cannon balls by hookr88
[Today at 07:40:51 PM]


Best/Preferred Scouting App by MADMAX
[Today at 06:57:28 PM]


Any info on public land South Dakota pheasant hunts? by follow maggie
[Today at 05:27:14 PM]


Oregon spring bear by Twispriver
[Today at 04:32:22 PM]


Search underway for three missing people after boat sinks near Mukilteo by Platensek-po
[Today at 01:59:06 PM]


Desert Sheds by MADMAX
[Today at 11:25:33 AM]


Nevada Results by cem3434
[Today at 11:18:49 AM]


Last year putting in… by JimmyHoffa
[Today at 11:07:02 AM]


Sportsman’s Muzzloader Selection by VickGar
[Yesterday at 09:20:43 PM]


Vantage Bridge by jackelope
[Yesterday at 08:03:05 PM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by 87Ford
[Yesterday at 07:35:40 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by go4steelhd
[Yesterday at 03:25:16 PM]


New to ML-Optics help by Threewolves
[Yesterday at 02:55:25 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal