Sorry but, see wolf, see threat! its that simple!!!
There IS a reason they were thinned out years ago! 
The point is that the guy made a statement saying the wolf he shot presented no imminent threat. He clearly did himself no favors by saying that, especially considering that he's under investigation for shooting an endangered species in the State of WA. Whether or not he actually performed a service by his act isn't pertinent. If and when this goes to trial, his comments will not help his defense.
My post wasn't meant to be about the article.
If you "know" wolves, my statement speaks for itself.
You can debate the wolf "issue" all you want and IT makes for heated debate which some find fulfilling.
There was/is a reason they were/needed to be thinned. THEY were never needed to be "re-introduced" by man!
