Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: pianoman9701 on February 13, 2015, 05:00:55 AMQuote from: M_ray on February 12, 2015, 10:57:18 PMOnce again you guys can't get through one wolf post without the mention of moving wolves to Seattle, the Wet Side blah blah blah and you wonder why a lot of your words go unnoticed or without much merit anymore? I have to say it on every wolf post .... I have yet to see a west side hunter say that they were in favor of wolves being re-introduced , translocated , or relocated anywhere in Wa East or west!!! But you guys won't be happy until every last hunter in this state suffers your same misery! Its an absurd comment and soon people are going to just quit reading these posts because of it ... I know I for one am already tired of it 😬If you're tired of it, don't post. Were you a hall monitor in high school?No but apparently some here need one.
Quote from: M_ray on February 12, 2015, 10:57:18 PMOnce again you guys can't get through one wolf post without the mention of moving wolves to Seattle, the Wet Side blah blah blah and you wonder why a lot of your words go unnoticed or without much merit anymore? I have to say it on every wolf post .... I have yet to see a west side hunter say that they were in favor of wolves being re-introduced , translocated , or relocated anywhere in Wa East or west!!! But you guys won't be happy until every last hunter in this state suffers your same misery! Its an absurd comment and soon people are going to just quit reading these posts because of it ... I know I for one am already tired of it 😬If you're tired of it, don't post. Were you a hall monitor in high school?
Once again you guys can't get through one wolf post without the mention of moving wolves to Seattle, the Wet Side blah blah blah and you wonder why a lot of your words go unnoticed or without much merit anymore? I have to say it on every wolf post .... I have yet to see a west side hunter say that they were in favor of wolves being re-introduced , translocated , or relocated anywhere in Wa East or west!!! But you guys won't be happy until every last hunter in this state suffers your same misery! Its an absurd comment and soon people are going to just quit reading these posts because of it ... I know I for one am already tired of it 😬
Quote from: wolfbait on February 13, 2015, 06:41:01 AMQuote from: M_ray on February 12, 2015, 10:57:18 PMOnce again you guys can't get through one wolf post without the mention of moving wolves to Seattle, the Wet Side blah blah blah and you wonder why a lot of your words go unnoticed or without much merit anymore? I have to say it on every wolf post .... I have yet to see a west side hunter say that they were in favor of wolves being re-introduced , translocated , or relocated anywhere in Wa East or west!!! But you guys won't be happy until every last hunter in this state suffers your same misery! Its an absurd comment and soon people are going to just quit reading these posts because of it ... I know I for one am already tired of it 😬M_Ray, you already have wolves on the west side, and just like the east side WDFW will not confirm until they are forced to, do to livestock predation or some other wolf problem. I highly doubt anyone could get WDFW to move wolves that included a paper trail. "Threatening" WDFW with a forced relocation might speed them up at confirming wolves that are already roaming the West side.If getting in a twist over comments that some would want delisting sooner by forcing WDFW to "move" wolves around to speed up recover bothers you so much, maybe you shouldn't be reading the wolf thread. No but once again you guys miss the point and I dont need you to tell us what we already know ... My point is WE DONT WANT THEM ANYWHERE! is that so hard to understand? The comment "move them to Seattle or Wetside" is a idiotic statement IMO and does nothing to solve the issue. I don't doubt they are on the Westside in fact Ive seen their tracks within and hour drive of my house over 20 years ago. But again most and mean most of us here on this side were strongly against them being ANYWHERE in the state and now strongly against them spreading throughout the whole state. To put it into perspective lets say they started with the re-intro on the west side I wouldnt comment on every thread "Well we should move them to Spokane" It gets old real quick dont you think we know that we are out numbered by the Liberal do gooders? you try living with them it's maddening to say the least and I know its frustration and anger that you guys want the wolf lovers to have to live with them and suffer your pain ... but then go post that on their forums cause here your just channeling your anger towards the wrong group. [quoteIf getting in a twist over comments that some would want delisting sooner by forcing WDFW to "move" wolves around to speed up recover bothers you so much, maybe you shouldn't be reading the wolf thread. ]
Quote from: M_ray on February 12, 2015, 10:57:18 PMOnce again you guys can't get through one wolf post without the mention of moving wolves to Seattle, the Wet Side blah blah blah and you wonder why a lot of your words go unnoticed or without much merit anymore? I have to say it on every wolf post .... I have yet to see a west side hunter say that they were in favor of wolves being re-introduced , translocated , or relocated anywhere in Wa East or west!!! But you guys won't be happy until every last hunter in this state suffers your same misery! Its an absurd comment and soon people are going to just quit reading these posts because of it ... I know I for one am already tired of it 😬M_Ray, you already have wolves on the west side, and just like the east side WDFW will not confirm until they are forced to, do to livestock predation or some other wolf problem. I highly doubt anyone could get WDFW to move wolves that included a paper trail. "Threatening" WDFW with a forced relocation might speed them up at confirming wolves that are already roaming the West side.If getting in a twist over comments that some would want delisting sooner by forcing WDFW to "move" wolves around to speed up recover bothers you so much, maybe you shouldn't be reading the wolf thread.
Quote from: M_ray on February 13, 2015, 02:00:42 PMQuote from: wolfbait on February 13, 2015, 06:41:01 AMQuote from: M_ray on February 12, 2015, 10:57:18 PMOnce again you guys can't get through one wolf post without the mention of moving wolves to Seattle, the Wet Side blah blah blah and you wonder why a lot of your words go unnoticed or without much merit anymore? I have to say it on every wolf post .... I have yet to see a west side hunter say that they were in favor of wolves being re-introduced , translocated , or relocated anywhere in Wa East or west!!! But you guys won't be happy until every last hunter in this state suffers your same misery! Its an absurd comment and soon people are going to just quit reading these posts because of it ... I know I for one am already tired of it 😬M_Ray, you already have wolves on the west side, and just like the east side WDFW will not confirm until they are forced to, do to livestock predation or some other wolf problem. I highly doubt anyone could get WDFW to move wolves that included a paper trail. "Threatening" WDFW with a forced relocation might speed them up at confirming wolves that are already roaming the West side.If getting in a twist over comments that some would want delisting sooner by forcing WDFW to "move" wolves around to speed up recover bothers you so much, maybe you shouldn't be reading the wolf thread. No but once again you guys miss the point and I dont need you to tell us what we already know ... My point is WE DONT WANT THEM ANYWHERE! is that so hard to understand? The comment "move them to Seattle or Wetside" is a idiotic statement IMO and does nothing to solve the issue. I don't doubt they are on the Westside in fact Ive seen their tracks within and hour drive of my house over 20 years ago. But again most and mean most of us here on this side were strongly against them being ANYWHERE in the state and now strongly against them spreading throughout the whole state. To put it into perspective lets say they started with the re-intro on the west side I wouldnt comment on every thread "Well we should move them to Spokane" It gets old real quick dont you think we know that we are out numbered by the Liberal do gooders? you try living with them it's maddening to say the least and I know its frustration and anger that you guys want the wolf lovers to have to live with them and suffer your pain ... but then go post that on their forums cause here your just channeling your anger towards the wrong group. [quoteIf getting in a twist over comments that some would want delisting sooner by forcing WDFW to "move" wolves around to speed up recover bothers you so much, maybe you shouldn't be reading the wolf thread. ]Then just say that and no one will get in a twist That is a reasonable comment "Move them to Seattle" isn't ... its redundant and you know the guys in Olympia would never do it so it serves no purpose other than to look as if you want the whole state ruined cause your honey hole got ruined! How are we on the west side supposed to take the rest of your comments seriously?
Quote from: M_ray on February 13, 2015, 02:13:24 PMQuote from: M_ray on February 13, 2015, 01:37:49 PMQuote from: pianoman9701 on February 13, 2015, 05:00:55 AMQuote from: M_ray on February 12, 2015, 10:57:18 PMOnce again you guys can't get through one wolf post without the mention of moving wolves to Seattle, the Wet Side blah blah blah and you wonder why a lot of your words go unnoticed or without much merit anymore? I have to say it on every wolf post .... I have yet to see a west side hunter say that they were in favor of wolves being re-introduced , translocated , or relocated anywhere in Wa East or west!!! But you guys won't be happy until every last hunter in this state suffers your same misery! Its an absurd comment and soon people are going to just quit reading these posts because of it ... I know I for one am already tired of it 😬If you're tired of it, don't post. Were you a hall monitor in high school?No but apparently some here need one.And Pianoman thats really mature making it a personal attack I dont even know why you and wolfbait are on me about my post when it was villageidiot that made the comment in the first place ... we seem a little defensive? ... but thanks for proving my point.
Quote from: M_ray on February 13, 2015, 01:37:49 PMQuote from: pianoman9701 on February 13, 2015, 05:00:55 AMQuote from: M_ray on February 12, 2015, 10:57:18 PMOnce again you guys can't get through one wolf post without the mention of moving wolves to Seattle, the Wet Side blah blah blah and you wonder why a lot of your words go unnoticed or without much merit anymore? I have to say it on every wolf post .... I have yet to see a west side hunter say that they were in favor of wolves being re-introduced , translocated , or relocated anywhere in Wa East or west!!! But you guys won't be happy until every last hunter in this state suffers your same misery! Its an absurd comment and soon people are going to just quit reading these posts because of it ... I know I for one am already tired of it 😬If you're tired of it, don't post. Were you a hall monitor in high school?No but apparently some here need one.
Quote from: wolfbait on February 13, 2015, 02:19:17 PMQuote from: M_ray on February 13, 2015, 02:00:42 PMQuote from: wolfbait on February 13, 2015, 06:41:01 AMQuote from: M_ray on February 12, 2015, 10:57:18 PMOnce again you guys can't get through one wolf post without the mention of moving wolves to Seattle, the Wet Side blah blah blah and you wonder why a lot of your words go unnoticed or without much merit anymore? I have to say it on every wolf post .... I have yet to see a west side hunter say that they were in favor of wolves being re-introduced , translocated , or relocated anywhere in Wa East or west!!! But you guys won't be happy until every last hunter in this state suffers your same misery! Its an absurd comment and soon people are going to just quit reading these posts because of it ... I know I for one am already tired of it 😬M_Ray, you already have wolves on the west side, and just like the east side WDFW will not confirm until they are forced to, do to livestock predation or some other wolf problem. I highly doubt anyone could get WDFW to move wolves that included a paper trail. "Threatening" WDFW with a forced relocation might speed them up at confirming wolves that are already roaming the West side.If getting in a twist over comments that some would want delisting sooner by forcing WDFW to "move" wolves around to speed up recover bothers you so much, maybe you shouldn't be reading the wolf thread. No but once again you guys miss the point and I dont need you to tell us what we already know ... My point is WE DONT WANT THEM ANYWHERE! is that so hard to understand? The comment "move them to Seattle or Wetside" is a idiotic statement IMO and does nothing to solve the issue. I don't doubt they are on the Westside in fact Ive seen their tracks within and hour drive of my house over 20 years ago. But again most and mean most of us here on this side were strongly against them being ANYWHERE in the state and now strongly against them spreading throughout the whole state. To put it into perspective lets say they started with the re-intro on the west side I wouldnt comment on every thread "Well we should move them to Spokane" It gets old real quick dont you think we know that we are out numbered by the Liberal do gooders? you try living with them it's maddening to say the least and I know its frustration and anger that you guys want the wolf lovers to have to live with them and suffer your pain ... but then go post that on their forums cause here your just channeling your anger towards the wrong group. [quoteIf getting in a twist over comments that some would want delisting sooner by forcing WDFW to "move" wolves around to speed up recover bothers you so much, maybe you shouldn't be reading the wolf thread. ]Then just say that and no one will get in a twist That is a reasonable comment "Move them to Seattle" isn't ... its redundant and you know the guys in Olympia would never do it so it serves no purpose other than to look as if you want the whole state ruined cause your honey hole got ruined! How are we on the west side supposed to take the rest of your comments seriously?KFhunter has a horse trailer and he said he would haul the wolves for free, you just can't beat free wolves M-Ray. WDFW said it would cost them a million to translocate wolves to the west side. Maybe we can work a deal. What do you think?
Quote from: M_ray on February 13, 2015, 02:28:00 PMQuote from: M_ray on February 13, 2015, 02:13:24 PMQuote from: M_ray on February 13, 2015, 01:37:49 PMQuote from: pianoman9701 on February 13, 2015, 05:00:55 AMQuote from: M_ray on February 12, 2015, 10:57:18 PMOnce again you guys can't get through one wolf post without the mention of moving wolves to Seattle, the Wet Side blah blah blah and you wonder why a lot of your words go unnoticed or without much merit anymore? I have to say it on every wolf post .... I have yet to see a west side hunter say that they were in favor of wolves being re-introduced , translocated , or relocated anywhere in Wa East or west!!! But you guys won't be happy until every last hunter in this state suffers your same misery! Its an absurd comment and soon people are going to just quit reading these posts because of it ... I know I for one am already tired of it 😬If you're tired of it, don't post. Were you a hall monitor in high school?No but apparently some here need one.And Pianoman thats really mature making it a personal attack I dont even know why you and wolfbait are on me about my post when it was villageidiot that made the comment in the first place ... we seem a little defensive? ... but thanks for proving my point.You're very entertaining. Please continue to post. It's the most fun some of us have had all day. I can't believe you didn't add "nah-nah-nah-nah-nah-nah".
M-Ray, don't use when you really mean Man up and use an angry emoticon. It's like an emotional girl who is too insecure to speak her mind so she uses LOL on her texts.
And you wonder why you get no support
Quote from: Jonathan_S on February 13, 2015, 03:45:27 PMM-Ray, don't use when you really mean Man up and use an angry emoticon. It's like an emotional girl who is too insecure to speak her mind so she uses LOL on her texts. That totally makes sense And you must feel so smart now
Quote from: M_ray on February 13, 2015, 06:37:27 PMQuote from: Jonathan_S on February 13, 2015, 03:45:27 PMM-Ray, don't use when you really mean Man up and use an angry emoticon. It's like an emotional girl who is too insecure to speak her mind so she uses LOL on her texts. That totally makes sense And you must feel so smart nowLighten up Francis, you're getting this wrapped around the axle because the guy isn't making the argument the way you think he should.
