collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 243 vs 17  (Read 15843 times)

Offline eastsidemallard74

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 879
  • Location: Moses Lake
  • EVEN THE PRESIDENT OF PETA EVOLVED FROM A HUNTER .
243 vs 17
« on: February 16, 2015, 08:21:48 AM »
So I just came into some money, aka tax return. I have been wanting to buy a yote gun to replace my 270 I currently use. I would like comments suggestions about HW members experience with both if possible. I know the pricing is about the same, but range is a little different. And rounds are close to the same cost.
Is it waterfowl season yet..............

Offline HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6236
  • Location: Toledo
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2015, 08:31:09 AM »
For yotes. If your stuck on those 2 calibers. .243 all the way. You would be extremely limited with the .17

Offline nwwanderer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4724
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2015, 08:34:06 AM »
Apples and oranges, to different to compare.  Stick with the 243, full metal jackets if processing pelts.

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10677
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2015, 08:35:32 AM »
I know some guys will swear by them but my personal experience with 17's is they are fun for shooting at paper and clay's on a VERY calm day but completely worthless for coyote killing.  Limits your range, packs zero punch, if the wind is blowing then forget about it, etc, etc.  Go with the .243 and blow some holes in some fawn killers! :tup:
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+25)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 11349
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2015, 08:37:39 AM »
.243 if those are the two to pick out of, and you can hunt deer with it too.

Others to consider...

.22-250
204 ruger
.223
« Last Edit: February 16, 2015, 08:53:53 AM by jrebel »

Offline Brad Harshman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Posts: 588
  • Location: central WA
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2015, 08:53:05 AM »
.243 if you those are the two to pick out of, and you can hunt deer with it too.

Others to consider...

.22-250
204 ruger
.223
:yeah: High Quality Advice!
Do some more research and see if one of the above calibers have any appeal.  I don't think you'll find too many votes for .17hmr.

Offline Bofire

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 5524
  • Location: Yelm
  • Harley YAR YAR YAR!
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2015, 09:25:37 AM »
I bet he is talking 17 Rem not HMR.  I use a 243 alot for coyotes, so that is my choice!!
Carl
When the chips are down..... the buffalo is empty!!

I do not shop at Amazon

Offline mountainman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 6010
  • Location: Wenatchee, Wa
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2015, 09:36:32 AM »
Killed many coyote and 2 Bob's with my 17 Fireball (assuming the OP meant centerfire. 17's), but would still agree with the 243.
« Last Edit: February 16, 2015, 10:26:44 AM by mountainman »
That Sword is more important than the Shield!

Offline fastdam

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 876
  • Location: washington
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2015, 09:41:01 AM »
17 hmr is not a reliable coyote round.
you already have a great deer gun so you dont need a 243 win.
 Why not go with a .223 is as stated above. Then you can get more versatility out of your arsenal.

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8821
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #9 on: February 16, 2015, 10:10:11 AM »
.243 all the way !

Offline eastsidemallard74

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 879
  • Location: Moses Lake
  • EVEN THE PRESIDENT OF PETA EVOLVED FROM A HUNTER .
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #10 on: February 16, 2015, 11:11:01 AM »
.243 if those are the two to pick out of, and you can hunt deer with it too.

Others to consider...

.22-250
204 ruger
.223
The other thing I'm looking at is pricing, and these 2 are in expensive. But like everything, you can spend alot of money on them. I don't pelt hunt either, thats why I started with the 270. But ammo is too damn expensive for shooting them with that thing. I never thought about the versatility of the 243(deer hunting,ect.) I was at Cabelas and looked at both these, and for 250-300 you can get a nice gun, some even with a scope.
Is it waterfowl season yet..............

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25043
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2015, 11:25:21 AM »
Since you live out where LOoong shots are possible I would say the 22-250 for a predator only gun. Ive hunted with a buddy that has one and they reach out a long ways for those coyotes  in the basin area. If you want "cheep" plentiful ammo then its hands down 223 They still reach out there but i think you really need to hand load to get all the potential out of them.

I started off with my 06 w ball ammo pretty good practice... even still about 2-3x the cost of 223 bulk reloads in ball ammo
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Jingles

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3868
  • Location: Methow Valley 98862
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #12 on: February 16, 2015, 12:00:30 PM »
If you want the rifle for something other (larger) than yotes go with the 243 if you are after something smaller than yotes < ( fox, bobcats, sagerats, small thin skinnd critters go with the 17.
If you are after a caliber that can be used on both still be fun and inexpensive to shoot go with the 22-250, especially if it is going to be a dedicated coyote gun put a 6 to 18 or 6 to 24 glass on it and have a field day
HMC/USN/RET
1969 -1990
The comments of this poster do not reflect the opinions of HUNTWA Administrators or Moderators unless they so state.

The duty of a Patriot is to protect his country from it's government

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31529
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #13 on: February 16, 2015, 12:02:53 PM »
If you are for sure wanting one of those two get the 243. If you are open to calibers get a 22-250 one of the best all around coyote gun calibers out there. Good choice in bullets and very flat shooting.
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39202
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: 243 vs 17
« Reply #14 on: February 16, 2015, 12:18:05 PM »
If you're just wanting to save money, stick with the 270. It's no more expensive than the 243 to shoot. You can buy decent ammo for $20/box.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

GMU 247 Entiat bear hunting by BigredRusch
[Today at 09:27:40 PM]


Crabbing at cornet bay? by WAcoueshunter
[Today at 09:26:00 PM]


2025 Area 9 King Opener by Gentrys
[Today at 09:07:41 PM]


If this is your trap by MADMAX
[Today at 07:45:21 PM]


Boundary Waters walleye trip by Fidelk
[Today at 07:38:05 PM]


JBLM by Nash
[Today at 07:05:57 PM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Today at 06:41:20 PM]


William o Douglas lakes by hughjorgan
[Today at 06:28:07 PM]


10 years ago- Now by Ryan P
[Today at 05:51:57 PM]


Please Comment on new Game management Plan, RE Furbearers by redi
[Today at 04:13:27 PM]


Pre season Archery SALE by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 12:39:09 PM]


Cell cam recommendation for security? by birdshooter1189
[Today at 12:08:32 PM]


2024 DFW Wolf report by throttlejocky20
[Today at 09:52:55 AM]


Livestock near 49 degrees north? by hunter399
[Today at 09:50:15 AM]


WA Moose scouting by hunter399
[Today at 09:46:20 AM]


JBLM Archery by WapitiTalk1
[Today at 09:08:57 AM]


Looking for Solid 22 LR input by run870
[Yesterday at 09:15:50 PM]


Teanaway bull elk by Stein
[Yesterday at 09:14:42 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by Vandal44
[Yesterday at 07:10:03 PM]


3 days for Kings by Parasite
[Yesterday at 07:02:37 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal