Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: BLRman on March 11, 2015, 10:34:52 AMQuote from: BULLBLASTER on March 11, 2015, 08:52:54 AMQuote from: BLRman on March 09, 2015, 09:11:53 PMFirst test loads were an epic fail. 2.5" groups @100 yards. Back to the drawing board.how are you going about load development? I had a box of 210s last year but couldnt get myself to try them so i sold them. My 215 bergers do so well for me. nothing at all agains the ablr. . Starting with a low charge and working up. Once I narrow down a charge range then I mess with seating depth. I think that is my issue with these, I have them too deep in order to fit my factory box mag. I will end up having to single feed or go to a Wyatt's box mag. Wyatt's will give me the space I need but requires some fitting, which I am too scared to do. Lolhmm. Was the 2.5 inches with the seating depth as long as mag allows? How far does that put you from the lands? What twist is your barrel?
Quote from: BULLBLASTER on March 11, 2015, 08:52:54 AMQuote from: BLRman on March 09, 2015, 09:11:53 PMFirst test loads were an epic fail. 2.5" groups @100 yards. Back to the drawing board.how are you going about load development? I had a box of 210s last year but couldnt get myself to try them so i sold them. My 215 bergers do so well for me. nothing at all agains the ablr. . Starting with a low charge and working up. Once I narrow down a charge range then I mess with seating depth. I think that is my issue with these, I have them too deep in order to fit my factory box mag. I will end up having to single feed or go to a Wyatt's box mag. Wyatt's will give me the space I need but requires some fitting, which I am too scared to do. Lol
Quote from: BLRman on March 09, 2015, 09:11:53 PMFirst test loads were an epic fail. 2.5" groups @100 yards. Back to the drawing board.how are you going about load development? I had a box of 210s last year but couldnt get myself to try them so i sold them. My 215 bergers do so well for me. nothing at all agains the ablr.
First test loads were an epic fail. 2.5" groups @100 yards. Back to the drawing board.
What's your brand x ?? I believe chasing the "perfect" bullet is almost as much fun as the actual shooting for some shooters....would be kind of boring to just find a decent load and never play with the other options
Quote from: kentrek on March 13, 2015, 09:30:41 PMWhat's your brand x ?? I believe chasing the "perfect" bullet is almost as much fun as the actual shooting for some shooters....would be kind of boring to just find a decent load and never play with the other options
FYI. Advertised BC's are not accurate 210gr lrabG1 BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT 0.730G7 BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT 0.366According to Bryan litz's new book "ballistic performance of rifle bullets"G1 .647G7 .332
Karl , RT has the chronographs in route !
Quote from: jasnt on March 13, 2015, 09:49:35 PMFYI. Advertised BC's are not accurate 210gr lrabG1 BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT 0.730G7 BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT 0.366According to Bryan litz's new book "ballistic performance of rifle bullets"G1 .647G7 .332So if that is true it sucks, how do we know what claims we can trust?