Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: AspenBud on March 05, 2015, 07:27:27 AMQuote from: bobcat on March 05, 2015, 07:06:58 AMAren't the less weary wolves already being shot? Just because it's not legal doesn't mean it's not happening.Stupid people run after wolves in a pickup and shoot them, stupid people try to send wolf pelts to Canada. Lets not leave out the really, really stupid people who put out poison.
Quote from: bobcat on March 05, 2015, 07:06:58 AMAren't the less weary wolves already being shot? Just because it's not legal doesn't mean it's not happening.Stupid people run after wolves in a pickup and shoot them, stupid people try to send wolf pelts to Canada.
Aren't the less weary wolves already being shot? Just because it's not legal doesn't mean it's not happening.
Quote from: AspenBud on March 05, 2015, 08:40:38 AMQuote from: mfswallace on March 05, 2015, 07:40:50 AMU must have meant Western Washington I think those you are assuming SSS are just trying to keep family safe and way of life intact You bet. If the political poles were geographically different I'm betting you would see a different wolf plan. You'd also still have a problem with them.Smarter people who see themselves as trying to keep family safe and life intact aren't reporting wolves they see to WDFW and they aren't making what they do visible to the world. They do what they think they should, dig a hole, and move on with life. It is no more unique than people who shoot hawks to protect chickens, shoot herons to protect $1,000 koi in a pond, whack sharks they catch on the head when fishing in the Sound, etc etc etc. Those things happen, the state knows it, and they make wildlife decisions with that in the calculus.I don't have a problem with wolves. I have a problem with WDFW wolf plan and anti's who won't let real control happen on all predators!! Minimum numbers are being used to continue protection of a predator that obviously doesn't need it because there are "possibly up to 200 wolves in Washington" already. This apex predator needs to be managed now not in another 6-7 yrs
Quote from: mfswallace on March 05, 2015, 07:40:50 AMU must have meant Western Washington I think those you are assuming SSS are just trying to keep family safe and way of life intact You bet. If the political poles were geographically different I'm betting you would see a different wolf plan. You'd also still have a problem with them.Smarter people who see themselves as trying to keep family safe and life intact aren't reporting wolves they see to WDFW and they aren't making what they do visible to the world. They do what they think they should, dig a hole, and move on with life. It is no more unique than people who shoot hawks to protect chickens, shoot herons to protect $1,000 koi in a pond, whack sharks they catch on the head when fishing in the Sound, etc etc etc. Those things happen, the state knows it, and they make wildlife decisions with that in the calculus.
U must have meant Western Washington I think those you are assuming SSS are just trying to keep family safe and way of life intact
Quote from: idahohuntr on March 05, 2015, 07:42:42 AMQuote from: AspenBud on March 05, 2015, 07:27:27 AMQuote from: bobcat on March 05, 2015, 07:06:58 AMAren't the less weary wolves already being shot? Just because it's not legal doesn't mean it's not happening.Stupid people run after wolves in a pickup and shoot them, stupid people try to send wolf pelts to Canada. Lets not leave out the really, really stupid people who put out poison.I would have to agree with you there I-h, poison kills too many other critters and attracts unwanted attention, the wolf recipes of this day in age are more sophisticated at targeting wolves only.
Here's a simple question I've been hesitant to ask: Is the parvo vaccine 100% effective for our beloved canines that are up on their shots?