collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Para Ordinance  (Read 1370 times)

Offline Mongo Hunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 855
  • Location: Vancouver
  • Pew Pew lifestyle
Para Ordinance
« on: April 29, 2015, 11:56:07 AM »
So I have an older Springfield Ultra Compact 1911. I like the gun except for the SIGHTS! They are what they called "Hi Visible" sights, the are tall, square and pointy. Why they put these on carry guns I have no Idea. Anyways I looked into getting Novak style sights installed, needless to say after the sights and machining required it was close to $300 and just not worth it to me.

So that brings my to my question. I thought about taking the money I would have spent on the sights and trade in my Springfield for a new 1911. One that caught my eye was the Para Ordinance Elite Officer.

http://para-usa.com/2013/firearms/elite/officer.php

It has the sights I want, is virtually the same size/weight as my Springfield, and has a ramped barrel (Achilles heel of 1911's IMO). Problem is I cant find a whole lot of reviews out there. anyone get their hands on one? maybe own or shot one? maybe have previous Para experience? anything helps guys, thanks.
Vegetarian: Old Indian word for Bad Hunter.

Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: Para Ordinance
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2015, 11:59:06 AM »
I was offered a new Para 1911 for $725 with 5 magazines to go with it a few years ago. I passed on it as I've heard that they make triggers a bit... different... and many don't like it. Might want to try one out at the range.  :twocents:

Offline Bofire

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 5524
  • Location: Yelm
  • Harley YAR YAR YAR!
Re: Para Ordinance
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2015, 09:21:06 AM »
Years ago I had a P14 and a P12, not that impressed with either. P14 took a lot of spendy machininging to change sights. thses were both double stacks and the grips are too big. P14 was heavy also. I have kimbers now much better!
Carl
When the chips are down..... the buffalo is empty!!

I do not shop at Amazon

Offline magnumb

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2015
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: Westside
Re: Para Ordinance
« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2015, 09:32:27 AM »
I'm not sure that most Kimbers are in the OP's 'network' or that any offered really interest him, but yes, they are very well made, efficient firearms.

Offline Watimberghost

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 2097
Re: Para Ordinance
« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2015, 10:13:30 AM »
I bought a P13 the day after I turned 21 and love it! Owned it for almost 12 years now and still my favorite sidearm!

Offline Mongo Hunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 855
  • Location: Vancouver
  • Pew Pew lifestyle
Re: Para Ordinance
« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2015, 12:05:10 PM »
Just heard that Freedom arms is dissolving Para USA.  :( Figures. Well I have some thinking to do and see if I still want to get it. I was also looking at the Sig Ultra and Colt Defender. The Colt of course has the name but is spendy. and I like the looks of the Sig but they are also spendy and new to the 1911 game.
Vegetarian: Old Indian word for Bad Hunter.

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal