collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Rem. 700 .300 win. mag  (Read 7434 times)

Offline hub

  • Port Orchard
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 106
  • Location: port orchard,Wa.
Re: Rem. 700 .300 win. mag
« Reply #30 on: May 20, 2015, 09:41:51 PM »
I load 180 PT,s accubonds and SGK,s ..015 to .025 off the lands. I have a rem. 700 BDL.  I would say .174 is way too much jump and very well could cause bad accuracy. You would also be losing velocity as you increase bullet jump. The 3.340 is usually used for clip fed rifles which normally will not accept a longer length. My coal. is usually from 3.565 to 3.600 depending on the bullet. Loading down to 3.340 is usually a bad idea for top loading bolt actions. Also loading 180,s that short eats up powder space. Not good either.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2015, 09:59:50 PM by hub »

Offline stevemiller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2679
Re: Rem. 700 .300 win. mag
« Reply #31 on: May 20, 2015, 09:46:10 PM »
Alright  :yeah:,Would age wear and tear extend this land out or is that just the way it was from the factory?
You must first be honest with yourself,Until then your just lying to everyone.

"The only one arguing is the one that is wrong"

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10657
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Rem. 700 .300 win. mag
« Reply #32 on: May 20, 2015, 09:49:01 PM »
One thing to watch though is if you load em long they may not fit in your box mag.  The load i have currently worked up for my 300wsm is too long for my box mag but shoots closer to quarter inch than half inch so she is getting upgraded to a Wyatt's box mag to allow for the long bullet.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline stevemiller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2679
Re: Rem. 700 .300 win. mag
« Reply #33 on: May 20, 2015, 10:15:07 PM »
One thing to watch though is if you load em long they may not fit in your box mag.  The load i have currently worked up for my 300wsm is too long for my box mag but shoots closer to quarter inch than half inch so she is getting upgraded to a Wyatt's box mag to allow for the long bullet.
This is good to know thanks.Now Im trying to figure if I should have this thing re chambered to ultra mag
You must first be honest with yourself,Until then your just lying to everyone.

"The only one arguing is the one that is wrong"

Offline jasnt

  • ELR junkie
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6539
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: Rem. 700 .300 win. mag
« Reply #34 on: May 31, 2015, 06:14:23 PM »
Personally I ignore the book aol. Let your rifle tell you where it likes it. I start at mag lenth or just under so it will feed properly. Then find optimum charge and then play with seating depth. I also found that most 300win mags I've loaded for like full power loads. They also don't seem too picky about seating depth,jme.
Ps book listed aol is just what depth they did their testing. Not where your rifle will want normally. .170 is quite a jump but I use a similar jump in my 300wm with vld's so it will feed out of my mag without troubles.
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/take_action  It takes 10 seconds and it’s free. To easy to make an excuse not to make your voice heard!!!!!!

The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal