collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Ewes  (Read 9642 times)

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Ewes
« Reply #45 on: September 05, 2009, 11:03:15 AM »
I know that when Timber was shooting with his (and he takes great pics) and I handed him the 400, he was twitterpated until he went and bought that 400. :chuckle:  Now you all will be blessed with even "better" pictures from him. LOL :)

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32895
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Ewes
« Reply #46 on: September 05, 2009, 11:21:18 AM »
Quote
But Pope's right in that many times the images it provides lack the kind of tack sharpness that we'd like to have on a consistent basis.

 Agreed, but lets not get it twisted either, how many on this site can run out and drop $6K-$10K on a lens? :dunno:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Tom Reichner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 425
  • Location: Omak, Washington
Re: Ewes
« Reply #47 on: September 05, 2009, 11:37:47 AM »
Agreed, but lets not get it twisted either, how many on this site can run out and drop $6K-$10K on a lens? :dunno:

Very good point.  Also, who can always be packing a big heavy supertelephoto into the bush?  If you need to take extra clothes, water, and food in your pack, you can pretty much rule out the ability to also carry a huge heavy lens.  So the 100-400 does have it's place.  And with IS you don't necessarily need to pack a tripod along, too.  

Wow - we've really gotten off topic.  I just realized this is a thread about ewes.  
Here's an attempt to "restore the thread" - a bunch of ewes from the Oroville herd.  There are also 2 young rams mixed in.  
Wildlife Photographed in the Wild
my website:  http://www.tomreichner.com/Wildlife

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Ewes
« Reply #48 on: September 05, 2009, 12:19:06 PM »
Speaking of ewes, saw a heard of them perched on a rock cropping above the NEW FENCE being put in on the Swakane.   They are making big progress on it.  Might hamper my photo efforts a bit, but cool to save some sheep to photgrpah in the future.   I wonder how effective it will be with it being broken up with private property.   I wonder how many will get trappe don the road in a fenced section. 

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32895
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Ewes
« Reply #49 on: September 05, 2009, 06:00:41 PM »
I saw that last week Bone, they have made it a long way in just a few days. The fence sure looks spindly though. Would be nice if they put a few doors but it looks like we will just have to climb it. :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: September 06, 2009, 08:59:46 AM by huntnphool »
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline popeshawnpaul

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 3583
  • Location: Bellevue, WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/smccully
    • Nature Photography
Re: Ewes
« Reply #50 on: September 07, 2009, 06:32:59 PM »
The 100-400 has it's place, just not in my bag.  It's always a tempting lens because of the versatility.  However, I can some the lens up in one sentence:  IT DOES EVERYTHING GOOD BUT NOTHING EXCELLENT. 

Actually, if I was a bird in flight type of guy I think it does that excellent because you would have enough light to stop it down and make it sharp and you often get a lot of background separation with a bird in flight or even on water.  Sorry, but I don't think you can convince me to have it over the 300mm f4 and a 1.4x when needed.

Also, I don't say this with the intent to recommend or sway other from it.  Other people can buy what they like for their budget.  Also, if you own the 100-400, don't take it as an insult to your lens.  Some guys like Heinz and other guys like Hunts ketchup.  To each his own.

Offline DesertBighorn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 56
  • Location: Kirkland
Re: Ewes
« Reply #51 on: September 07, 2009, 08:54:07 PM »
The 100-400 has it's place, just not in my bag.  It's always a tempting lens because of the versatility.  However, I can some the lens up in one sentence:  IT DOES EVERYTHING GOOD BUT NOTHING EXCELLENT. 

Actually, if I was a bird in flight type of guy I think it does that excellent because you would have enough light to stop it down and make it sharp and you often get a lot of background separation with a bird in flight or even on water.  Sorry, but I don't think you can convince me to have it over the 300mm f4 and a 1.4x when needed.

Also, I don't say this with the intent to recommend or sway other from it.  Other people can buy what they like for their budget.  Also, if you own the 100-400, don't take it as an insult to your lens.  Some guys like Heinz and other guys like Hunts ketchup.  To each his own.

I had one and sold it when I upgraded to a 300.  I kind of miss it for convenience.  If I'm not going on a dedicated photo trip, I could throw it in a shoulder bag with a body, flash and couple other lenses and feel like I had things covered. 
 

There was one on CraigsList today for $900!!  I emailed the guy, thinking if it was decent I would buy it and sell it for a profit.  The thing was gone in less than 45 minutes from posting.

-Doug

Offline popeshawnpaul

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 3583
  • Location: Bellevue, WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/smccully
    • Nature Photography
Re: Ewes
« Reply #52 on: September 07, 2009, 10:40:25 PM »
I think it's one of their best selling lenses.  It's very popular.  There have been rumors of an upgraded version for a while but nothing yet.  Honestly, why would you upgrade a lens that is selling like gangbusters?  I'm definitely in the minority with my opinion on this lens.  That being said, I'm in the minority on a lot of opinions around here...   :chuckle:

Here is one of my 100-400 shots...


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Archery elk gear, 2025. by Hucci
[Today at 08:13:43 AM]


Go kill some dogs! by JakeLand
[Today at 08:09:22 AM]


Pocket Carry by Macs B
[Today at 07:39:26 AM]


38% increase in fishing and hunting licenses by mikey549
[Today at 06:07:39 AM]


E scouting for bears by bear
[Today at 05:55:13 AM]


Herring anyone? by CastleRocker
[Yesterday at 09:42:53 PM]


Leupold Display fade by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 08:17:29 PM]


49 degrees north late Moose tag by Buzzsaw461
[Yesterday at 07:52:24 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 07:22:02 PM]


Minimum post count needed to view classifieds by Hucci
[Yesterday at 06:43:35 PM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Yesterday at 03:12:07 PM]


Encouraging on e side by hdshot
[Yesterday at 02:54:51 PM]


506 Willapa Hills Late Season Antlerless Tag by Fast Rider
[Yesterday at 12:48:55 PM]


Lund Fisherman 1800 info/advice by Stein
[Yesterday at 11:46:54 AM]


Knotty duck decoys by goosegunner
[Yesterday at 11:45:58 AM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by dwils233
[Yesterday at 11:36:36 AM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 09:21:15 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal