collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Teanaway rancher  (Read 15977 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
Re: Teanaway rancher
« Reply #30 on: September 22, 2015, 10:15:34 PM »

Offline nwwanderer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4824
Re: Teanaway rancher
« Reply #31 on: September 23, 2015, 08:37:32 AM »
Similar numbers with Montana studies.  Actual paid predation compensation represents less than 10% of the loss.  As stated, individual producers 'living' with wolves can not economically tolerate sustained wolf activity.  If the wolf supporters and governments want them, pay the bill. 

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
Re: Teanaway rancher
« Reply #32 on: September 23, 2015, 08:53:29 AM »
Similar numbers with Montana studies.  Actual paid predation compensation represents less than 10% of the loss.  As stated, individual producers 'living' with wolves can not economically tolerate sustained wolf activity.  If the wolf supporters and governments want them, pay the bill.

It's bad enough that they refuse or don't have the funding for "confirmed" wolf killed livestock, but then they purposely lie about what kills your livestock when they know it was wolves, as has happened in WA etc. many times.

It seems in many cases going to the state game agencies do to livestock killed by wolves has shown to be a total waste of time and money for the ranches. 

Offline jasnt

  • ELR junkie
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6540
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: Teanaway rancher
« Reply #33 on: September 23, 2015, 10:26:20 AM »
Ya then they waste $850k on a "specialist" for an advisory group that dosent even mak decisions, just advises. :bash:  then they will say we are too broke to save the deer and elk or pay the ranchers the 10% of there losses. At least in Montana they can use hunting pressure to push the wolves away from livestock.

And to think people still have faith in wdfw. The mis-management of Washington's resources has got to stop! 

Attention WDFW: stop wasting our conservation money on wolves. They are here to stay no matter what we do from here on out wolves will be here for century's to come. Let's put that money in to ensuring the future of our elk deer and moose herds and the wolves food. Get back to doing your job managing game for a sustainable hunting numbers and hunting opportunities 
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/take_action  It takes 10 seconds and it’s free. To easy to make an excuse not to make your voice heard!!!!!!

The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

Offline nwwanderer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4824
Re: Teanaway rancher
« Reply #34 on: September 23, 2015, 01:16:47 PM »
Lack of money?  Allocation problems yes, $850,000 facilitators, multi million dollar wolf plans, designated wolf staff, research budgets, helicopter shoots, collaring budgets, predation studies, public wolf meetings, advisory groups, I could go on.  This is just Washington, not including any multi state 'programs' like the $100,000,000 transplant theft, some say only $70,000,00, others $120,000,000 with no hope of really knowing.  Should I mention the budgets of the many groups that support the wolves?

Just pay the bill

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Big game season proposals by Limhangerslayer
[Yesterday at 08:04:13 PM]


Oregon antelope by Brute
[Yesterday at 07:37:54 PM]


Results of 3 point or better rule by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 07:03:38 PM]


Lifesize mountain lion by bigdub257
[Yesterday at 06:33:44 PM]


Rabbits on the Yakama Reservation? by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 06:03:50 PM]


WTB single shot 410 by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 04:32:36 PM]


2026 booth Puyallup show by Trapline Taxidermy
[Yesterday at 03:44:05 PM]


Black and tans by Huntinman
[Yesterday at 01:30:40 PM]


turkey hunting question series - 6 by MtnMuley
[Yesterday at 12:26:55 PM]


Muzzy needs by Dark2Dark
[Yesterday at 11:47:02 AM]


Oregon ballot measure to ban hunting, trapping, and ranching by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 08:48:06 AM]


turkey hunting question series - question 3 by birddogdad
[Yesterday at 08:12:26 AM]


turkey hunting question series - 7 by birddogdad
[Yesterday at 07:46:35 AM]


Wyoming 112 or 81 deer by crazeymaez
[Yesterday at 06:33:38 AM]


MOA Sporting llc great resource for load development by craigapphunt
[Yesterday at 05:46:04 AM]


2026 Seattle Sportmen's Convention - March 7, 2026 by wa.hunter
[Yesterday at 01:30:05 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal