collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: GW Science -- Continued  (Read 2368 times)

Offline 300UltraMagShooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 1408
GW Science -- Continued
« on: January 20, 2009, 12:51:24 AM »

Here is a prime example of the power of "funding" to sway science:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/7710

As long as these organizations recieve their funding through the government, how can we expect honest answers?  For sure, we can expect dishonest answer so they can continue to get funding, no?

If your research relies on government funding, are you likely to say "no, global warming is not caused by human releases of a trace gas" or are you likely to say, "we are fairly certain that it is, but we need furture study"? 


Offline 300UltraMagShooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 1408
Re: GW Science -- Continued
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2009, 12:58:50 AM »
As if that wasn't enough, check out ""650"" scientist real opinion about the issue:
http://www.mlive.com/opinion/flint/index.ssf/2009/01/its_time_to_pray_for_global_wa.html

650 scientist signed the petition and not a word from the MSM...  How predictable   :bash:
« Last Edit: January 20, 2009, 01:14:21 AM by 300UltraMagShooter »

Offline MichaelJ

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 3075
  • Location: Washington/Idaho
    • www.facebook.com/hellscanyonarmory
Re: GW Science -- Continued
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2009, 10:12:44 AM »
Known this one for awhile actually but its sure nice to read in a published column!  Gonna email it to some professors here at the University and see what their comments on it are...   :chuckle:

Michael
Hells Canyon Armory Custom Rifles
https://www.facebook.com/HellsCanyonArmory/
HCARifles@gmail.com

Offline Gobble

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 2542
  • Location: Yelm, Wa
  • Wack'em and Stack'em
    • Dave Harder
Re: GW Science -- Continued
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2009, 10:32:44 AM »
As if that wasn't enough, check out ""650"" scientist real opinion about the issue:
http://www.mlive.com/opinion/flint/index.ssf/2009/01/its_time_to_pray_for_global_wa.html

650 scientist signed the petition and not a word from the MSM...  How predictable   :bash:

I posted that one already but weve got to keep it fresh in the minds of the mis-informed  ;)

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

3 pintails by hdshot
[Today at 05:03:26 PM]


Hunting late season, where would you go? by Kc_Kracker
[Today at 05:01:16 PM]


Upland bird carry options by RobinHoodlum
[Today at 04:24:41 PM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by waoutdoorsman
[Today at 04:00:26 PM]


Game Warden Channel featuring my nephew on Nevada Wild by danderson
[Today at 03:51:08 PM]


Hunting DNR Natural Area Preserves by avidnwoutdoorsman
[Today at 03:26:14 PM]


East Side Quail Numbers? by vandeman17
[Today at 03:19:30 PM]


My Wenaha bull by pd
[Today at 02:32:16 PM]


Late Season archery elk by pcveen
[Today at 01:54:29 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by dilleytech
[Today at 01:36:30 PM]


Flynn’s Hunts!!! by Tafinder
[Today at 12:37:35 PM]


Dash cams by jrebel
[Today at 12:25:23 PM]


Mechanic help 4.0 ford by Woodchuck
[Today at 11:50:39 AM]


Slide Ridge Quality tag holders by throttlejocky20
[Today at 11:41:05 AM]


F150 Ecoboost Guys by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 11:25:53 AM]


Buck to Doe Ratio by OutHouse
[Today at 11:11:15 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by mburrows
[Today at 10:35:35 AM]


Any MT deer updates? by mburrows
[Today at 10:30:31 AM]


Turkey Summer Sausage by hunter399
[Today at 10:29:25 AM]


Idaho weight limit question by jbuck
[Today at 09:57:09 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal