Free: Contests & Raffles.
Sorry sir but I respectfully disagree,If they dont charge him with the Lacey Act they didnt charge him with all they could have.If we all want this poaching to stop,then we need to send a strong clear message no matter how popular the criminal may be.
Quote from: pianoman9701 on September 21, 2015, 12:53:11 PMQuote from: Jonnyjammer on September 21, 2015, 12:48:28 PMI dont know and not being a smarty pants but what would you consider trade.I consider anything you make money on in any way to be trade,therefore all of the trade made from these hunts should be under the lacey act.It doesn't matter what I consider trade. I'd like to see a Lacey Act charge on this. But the fact is that the whole point of Lacey was to take away the incentive for people to sell wild game meat and parts, which was a leading cause of the destruction of herds and was endangering species. The act is pretty specific in targeting trade in wild game across state borders. There could well be other laws which apply, but I don't think Lacey is one of them. I only play a lawyer on the internet, so it might apply. The AK guys (on another thread here) were charged with Lacey Act violations. It seems a pretty similar set of circumstances, but I am not familiar with the nuances of Lacey Act jurisprudence. http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/hunting-show-host-charged-poaching-alaska-33757764The above is the one Curly is noting. This is the Alwine/TSoM case.
Quote from: Jonnyjammer on September 21, 2015, 12:48:28 PMI dont know and not being a smarty pants but what would you consider trade.I consider anything you make money on in any way to be trade,therefore all of the trade made from these hunts should be under the lacey act.It doesn't matter what I consider trade. I'd like to see a Lacey Act charge on this. But the fact is that the whole point of Lacey was to take away the incentive for people to sell wild game meat and parts, which was a leading cause of the destruction of herds and was endangering species. The act is pretty specific in targeting trade in wild game across state borders. There could well be other laws which apply, but I don't think Lacey is one of them. I only play a lawyer on the internet, so it might apply.
I dont know and not being a smarty pants but what would you consider trade.I consider anything you make money on in any way to be trade,therefore all of the trade made from these hunts should be under the lacey act.
Matt seems to have disappeared from here and Facebook. A guy who made an honest mistake usually doesn't tuck tail and run...
well thats fine unless they made a deal and we dont know about it,What do you say about the trespassing?Did he get what he could have for that to?