collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Are we losing elk and deer permits to big timber companies in SE Washington??  (Read 42375 times)

Offline JLS

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 4623
  • Location: In my last tracks.....
  • Groups: Support the LWCF!
Reservation only hunts are a joke. All they do is let their family and friends hunt.

Reservations are done online.  I've used this program quite a bit over the last couple of years with only two bad experiences.  Both were remedied by WDFW.
Matthew 7:13-14

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51553
  • Location: E. WA
Is that 706 acres the FFTH, and is it the extent of the FFTH?  How do other landowners compare?   

Quote
Bennett Lumber LHP proposal:
• Multiple Parcels
• 9,835 Acres
• Landowner permits: 6 buck, 2 bull, 10 cow
(1 bull in following years)
1st pdf.

FWIW, this is the areas under discussion.

Quote
The Bennett Lumber property is located in Asotin, Columbia,
Garfield, and Walla Walla counties (GMUs 154, 162, 166, 172, and 178)
  2nd pdf.

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8823
  • Groups: Team getsum !
so how many land owners get depredation tags and sell them off ? same type of thing .

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50670
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope

Is that 706 acres the FFTH, and is it the extent of the FFTH?  How do other landowners compare?   

Quote
Bennett Lumber LHP proposal:
• Multiple Parcels
• 9,835 Acres
• Landowner permits: 6 buck, 2 bull, 10 cow
(1 bull in following years)
1st pdf.

FWIW, this is the areas under discussion.

Quote
The Bennett Lumber property is located in Asotin, Columbia,
Garfield, and Walla Walla counties (GMUs 154, 162, 166, 172, and 178)
  2nd pdf.

The 706 acre piece I was referring to is hunt by reservation land. It's #591 in the pic. The big chunk in the pic, 481, is hunt by written permission land.

"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
That sharp pain in your backside and bloody discharge may not be hemorrhoids after all.
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

Offline HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6360
  • Location: Toledo
I asked about access last year for my muzzy tag. Was told no access allowed. Talked to the bio over there. He said they weren't enrolled in the wdfw acess program. But may be this year. So they knew this was coming.

Offline rosscrazyelk

  • BMM
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 4634
  • Location: Sumner
As I have told you before Josh.. I believe this is absolutely  Bull S#%£.
No way they should be Givin any extra state tags... put the tags in the general  hunt and let the public have access.  If they want to keep  it to themselves  they have to draw just like the rest of us.
Everyone on this forum should call wdfw and let them have it...

Do you think that the forest company/land owner shouldn't be given any incentive to enroll his land into the hunt programs?  Why would any do it if there was no incentive for them?  No matter how big or small a company they have to pay a person to answer a phone and manage the program.  It would be far easier and cheaper to simply shut the gates and hunt behind them with their own land owner permits or go the way of Weyerhauser and lease it out to a few people that are easier to supervise.

If the state is gonna give them tags it should not count against our quota
If its brown knock it down

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50670
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Special permit area for branch antlered Bulls and late deer tags.
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline kirkl

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 2730
  • Location: Somewhere
  • USN Veteran- USS Nimitz CVN 68
like jackelope said, not over the counter deer and elk tags they are giving them. These are special permits we have get drawn for.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21825
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Special permit area for branch antlered Bulls and late deer tags.
The Dayton GMU has approximately 20 to 25 special branch antlered bull permits available per year. A loss of two would be around 8% to 10%.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32936
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
As I have told you before Josh.. I believe this is absolutely  Bull S#%£.
No way they should be Givin any extra state tags... put the tags in the general  hunt and let the public have access.  If they want to keep  it to themselves  they have to draw just like the rest of us.
Everyone on this forum should call wdfw and let them have it...

Do you think that the forest company/land owner shouldn't be given any incentive to enroll his land into the hunt programs?  Why would any do it if there was no incentive for them?  No matter how big or small a company they have to pay a person to answer a phone and manage the program.  It would be far easier and cheaper to simply shut the gates and hunt behind them with their own land owner permits or go the way of Weyerhauser and lease it out to a few people that are easier to supervise.

If the state is gonna give them tags it should not count against our quota
  To the best of my knowledge elk and deer tags are sold over the counter and unless I missed something they haven't ever sold out.  Is this a special hunt draw area?  Is there something other than the fact it is private land that makes tags harder to get for these GMUs? 

 You really need to do some research! :twocents:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline kirkl

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 2730
  • Location: Somewhere
  • USN Veteran- USS Nimitz CVN 68
As I have told you before Josh.. I believe this is absolutely  Bull S#%£.
No way they should be Givin any extra state tags... put the tags in the general  hunt and let the public have access.  If they want to keep  it to themselves  they have to draw just like the rest of us.
Everyone on this forum should call wdfw and let them have it...

Do you think that the forest company/land owner shouldn't be given any incentive to enroll his land into the hunt programs?  Why would any do it if there was no incentive for them?  No matter how big or small a company they have to pay a person to answer a phone and manage the program.  It would be far easier and cheaper to simply shut the gates and hunt behind them with their own land owner permits or go the way of Weyerhauser and lease it out to a few people that are easier to supervise.

If the state is gonna give them tags it should not count against our quota
  To the best of my knowledge elk and deer tags are sold over the counter and unless I missed something they haven't ever sold out.  Is this a special hunt draw area?  Is there something other than the fact it is private land that makes tags harder to get for these GMUs? 

 You really need to do some research! :twocents:

lol, yes, hes arguing and doesnt know what he is talking about.

Offline ipkus

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 719
  • Location: Eastern
Special permit area for branch antlered Bulls and late deer tags.
The Dayton GMU has approximately 20 to 25 special branch antlered bull permits available per year. A loss of two would be around 8% to 10%.

Not to mention when they carved special unit 1010 out of the Dayton unit a few years ago and took a chunk of Dayton permits for it.  Now this.

Ridiculous.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21825
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
As I have told you before Josh.. I believe this is absolutely  Bull S#%£.
No way they should be Givin any extra state tags... put the tags in the general  hunt and let the public have access.  If they want to keep  it to themselves  they have to draw just like the rest of us.
Everyone on this forum should call wdfw and let them have it...

Do you think that the forest company/land owner shouldn't be given any incentive to enroll his land into the hunt programs?  Why would any do it if there was no incentive for them?  No matter how big or small a company they have to pay a person to answer a phone and manage the program.  It would be far easier and cheaper to simply shut the gates and hunt behind them with their own land owner permits or go the way of Weyerhauser and lease it out to a few people that are easier to supervise.

If the state is gonna give them tags it should not count against our quota
  To the best of my knowledge elk and deer tags are sold over the counter and unless I missed something they haven't ever sold out.  Is this a special hunt draw area?  Is there something other than the fact it is private land that makes tags harder to get for these GMUs? 

 You really need to do some research! :twocents:
I go down to the Big 5 every year and buy my over-the-counter Dayton bull permit. A few years back, I decided to try something new and bought a Colockum OTC bull permit and shot a 380 bull. I don't know the problem is.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32936
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
As I have told you before Josh.. I believe this is absolutely  Bull S#%£.
No way they should be Givin any extra state tags... put the tags in the general  hunt and let the public have access.  If they want to keep  it to themselves  they have to draw just like the rest of us.
Everyone on this forum should call wdfw and let them have it...

Do you think that the forest company/land owner shouldn't be given any incentive to enroll his land into the hunt programs?  Why would any do it if there was no incentive for them?  No matter how big or small a company they have to pay a person to answer a phone and manage the program.  It would be far easier and cheaper to simply shut the gates and hunt behind them with their own land owner permits or go the way of Weyerhauser and lease it out to a few people that are easier to supervise.

If the state is gonna give them tags it should not count against our quota
  To the best of my knowledge elk and deer tags are sold over the counter and unless I missed something they haven't ever sold out.  Is this a special hunt draw area?  Is there something other than the fact it is private land that makes tags harder to get for these GMUs? 

 You really need to do some research! :twocents:
I go down to the Big 5 every year and buy my over-the-counter Dayton bull permit. A few years back, I decided to try something new and bought a Colockum OTC bull permit and shot a 380 bull. I don't know the problem is.

  :tup: Pure speculation on my part but I'd be willing to bet that unless the Bennett tags are designated spike only, they don't end up on spike bulls. ;)
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Steaming Euro Mounts by Pathfinder101
[Today at 08:04:11 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by kirkl
[Today at 07:11:10 AM]


Vortex scope by hookr88
[Today at 07:07:31 AM]


49 DN Moose Success by blindluck
[Today at 06:19:02 AM]


Turnbull elk hunt by getreal711
[Today at 05:24:02 AM]


What happened to the Cowlitz by BigGoonTuna
[Today at 04:05:47 AM]


Grayback Youth Hunt by Deer slayer
[Yesterday at 07:56:31 PM]


Displaced Hunting Camps? by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 07:55:32 PM]


SPIKE??? by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 07:53:00 PM]


Bugs and bones by jackelope
[Yesterday at 07:38:55 PM]


Mountain View archery elk. by High Climber
[Yesterday at 04:48:52 PM]


WWF influence on Inslee's final commission appointments by Firstgenhunter
[Yesterday at 04:02:57 PM]


What's your favorite elk hunting cartridge? by Cougartail
[Yesterday at 03:25:46 PM]


Mill creek watershed by Hot Lunch
[Yesterday at 01:29:07 PM]


Wy Region A whitetail by jamesfromseattle
[Yesterday at 01:18:15 PM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by X-Force
[Yesterday at 11:42:47 AM]


Plugging bighorn sheep? by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 10:30:48 AM]


Paper bee hive, worth anything?? by Ridgeratt
[Yesterday at 09:16:52 AM]


Multi Season leftovers by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 05:34:54 AM]


MA-10 Coho by WAcoueshunter
[October 04, 2025, 10:32:46 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal