Free: Contests & Raffles.
Friday, November 1, 2002-Defenders of Wildlife and the Northwest Ecosystem Alliance said yesterday they have sent a petition to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, requesting that the agency restore and protect gray wolves under the Endangered Species Act. "Northwest Ecosystem Alliance (now Conservation Northwest)"http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20021101&slug=graywolves01mJul 23, 2008-The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife has convened a diverse group of stakeholders, including Conservation Northwest, to develop a state conservation and management plan for wolves.http://www.conservationnw.org/news/pressroom/press-releases/wolf-pack-confirmed-in-washington-stateWolf Advisory GroupConservation NorthwestDefenders of WildlifeHumane Society of the United StatesSierra Club
Quote from: MuleDeer on December 23, 2015, 10:20:45 PMQuote from: wolfbait on December 22, 2015, 11:10:52 PMQuote from: MuleDeer on December 22, 2015, 01:29:43 PMQuote from: wolfbait on December 22, 2015, 08:20:50 AMFederal judge rejects wolf kills in statehttp://www.king5.com/story/tech/science/environment/2015/12/21/federal-judge-rejects-wolf-kills-state/77725338/Please include all facts when you post items like this to fire people up. For example, the fact that lethal actions can and will still be taken on wolves in WA state. Just not by Wildlife Services. Lethal action will be done by WDFW.I posted a link to an article, after this would you like me to get with you first, maybe find out how you want things posted? Hate the thought of firing people up.I think I would rather have the USFWS taking care of the problem wolves as they have been doing it far longer then WDFW. And as far as WDFW handling problem wolves to date, they have been terrible, heck they can't even find wolf packs under their nose that need confirming.Wolf history and WDFW go back 13+ years, and as you probably know history tells quite a bit about those we are dealing with. Do you think the WAG and the $850,000 consultant are going to change how WDFW manage wolves?Do I think the WAG can change the way WDFW manages wolves? Yes, I do. That's why I applied for a position, and why I am still there fighting for "our side". And no, don't bother contacting me to make sure you post the way I want, just post all the facts, instead of trying to stir the pot like the press does with their "partial headlines" to get a rise out of people. If your goal is to educate people, then educate them with everything we can, not just the 1/2 truths to go for the most shock possible. I seem to be having a bit of trouble getting all the facts like you wanted MD, maybe you can help me out with the info. below.Where did WA's wolves come from? U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northern Rocky Mountain Recovery Program Update2008-Until 2008, no wild wolves had been confirmed west of the DPS boundary in Washington or Oregon. However, in July 2008, a wolf pack (2 adults and 6 pups) was discovered near Twisp, WA (just east of the North Cascades and west of the DPS boundary). Genetic testing showed these wolves did not originate from the NRM DPS; instead they apparently dispersed southward from the wolf population in southcentral British Columbiahttp://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/mammals/wolf/annualrpt08/FINAL_2008_USFWS_Recovery_Program_Update_3-17-09.pdfJuly 24, 2008 DNA tests showed that the wolves originated from a population in the northern British Columbia and Alberta provinces of Canada.“This is a natural colonization,” said Fitkin. “The wolves are naturally immigrating.”http://www.conservationnw.org/news/pressroom/press-clips/dna-samples-confirm-gray-wolves-are-back-in-methow-valleyJun 25, 2013-“DNA obtained from Lookout Pack wolves has shown they are descendents of wolves living in coastal British Columbia”, who lived separately from inland wolves for many generations, “Conservation Northwest” said in a press release. http://methowvalleynews.com/2013/06/25/will-federal-delisting-impact-states-wolves/
Quote from: wolfbait on December 22, 2015, 11:10:52 PMQuote from: MuleDeer on December 22, 2015, 01:29:43 PMQuote from: wolfbait on December 22, 2015, 08:20:50 AMFederal judge rejects wolf kills in statehttp://www.king5.com/story/tech/science/environment/2015/12/21/federal-judge-rejects-wolf-kills-state/77725338/Please include all facts when you post items like this to fire people up. For example, the fact that lethal actions can and will still be taken on wolves in WA state. Just not by Wildlife Services. Lethal action will be done by WDFW.I posted a link to an article, after this would you like me to get with you first, maybe find out how you want things posted? Hate the thought of firing people up.I think I would rather have the USFWS taking care of the problem wolves as they have been doing it far longer then WDFW. And as far as WDFW handling problem wolves to date, they have been terrible, heck they can't even find wolf packs under their nose that need confirming.Wolf history and WDFW go back 13+ years, and as you probably know history tells quite a bit about those we are dealing with. Do you think the WAG and the $850,000 consultant are going to change how WDFW manage wolves?Do I think the WAG can change the way WDFW manages wolves? Yes, I do. That's why I applied for a position, and why I am still there fighting for "our side". And no, don't bother contacting me to make sure you post the way I want, just post all the facts, instead of trying to stir the pot like the press does with their "partial headlines" to get a rise out of people. If your goal is to educate people, then educate them with everything we can, not just the 1/2 truths to go for the most shock possible.
Quote from: MuleDeer on December 22, 2015, 01:29:43 PMQuote from: wolfbait on December 22, 2015, 08:20:50 AMFederal judge rejects wolf kills in statehttp://www.king5.com/story/tech/science/environment/2015/12/21/federal-judge-rejects-wolf-kills-state/77725338/Please include all facts when you post items like this to fire people up. For example, the fact that lethal actions can and will still be taken on wolves in WA state. Just not by Wildlife Services. Lethal action will be done by WDFW.I posted a link to an article, after this would you like me to get with you first, maybe find out how you want things posted? Hate the thought of firing people up.I think I would rather have the USFWS taking care of the problem wolves as they have been doing it far longer then WDFW. And as far as WDFW handling problem wolves to date, they have been terrible, heck they can't even find wolf packs under their nose that need confirming.Wolf history and WDFW go back 13+ years, and as you probably know history tells quite a bit about those we are dealing with. Do you think the WAG and the $850,000 consultant are going to change how WDFW manage wolves?
Quote from: wolfbait on December 22, 2015, 08:20:50 AMFederal judge rejects wolf kills in statehttp://www.king5.com/story/tech/science/environment/2015/12/21/federal-judge-rejects-wolf-kills-state/77725338/Please include all facts when you post items like this to fire people up. For example, the fact that lethal actions can and will still be taken on wolves in WA state. Just not by Wildlife Services. Lethal action will be done by WDFW.
Federal judge rejects wolf kills in statehttp://www.king5.com/story/tech/science/environment/2015/12/21/federal-judge-rejects-wolf-kills-state/77725338/
How much money does the average hunters association have, to fight the billionaires, that dish out millions upon millions to save the wolves ? That's the reason why going to meetings is worthless..Name ANY animal rights group that looses to the average hunting groups, MuleDeer ?
What do you do for a living Muledeer ?I don't know why these pictures are flipped ? Please turn it for me, thanks !
Quote from: wolfbait on December 24, 2015, 06:37:34 PMQuote from: MuleDeer on December 23, 2015, 10:20:45 PMQuote from: wolfbait on December 22, 2015, 11:10:52 PMQuote from: MuleDeer on December 22, 2015, 01:29:43 PMQuote from: wolfbait on December 22, 2015, 08:20:50 AMFederal judge rejects wolf kills in statehttp://www.king5.com/story/tech/science/environment/2015/12/21/federal-judge-rejects-wolf-kills-state/77725338/Please include all facts when you post items like this to fire people up. For example, the fact that lethal actions can and will still be taken on wolves in WA state. Just not by Wildlife Services. Lethal action will be done by WDFW.I posted a link to an article, after this would you like me to get with you first, maybe find out how you want things posted? Hate the thought of firing people up.I think I would rather have the USFWS taking care of the problem wolves as they have been doing it far longer then WDFW. And as far as WDFW handling problem wolves to date, they have been terrible, heck they can't even find wolf packs under their nose that need confirming.Wolf history and WDFW go back 13+ years, and as you probably know history tells quite a bit about those we are dealing with. Do you think the WAG and the $850,000 consultant are going to change how WDFW manage wolves?Do I think the WAG can change the way WDFW manages wolves? Yes, I do. That's why I applied for a position, and why I am still there fighting for "our side". And no, don't bother contacting me to make sure you post the way I want, just post all the facts, instead of trying to stir the pot like the press does with their "partial headlines" to get a rise out of people. If your goal is to educate people, then educate them with everything we can, not just the 1/2 truths to go for the most shock possible. I seem to be having a bit of trouble getting all the facts like you wanted MD, maybe you can help me out with the info. below.Where did WA's wolves come from? U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northern Rocky Mountain Recovery Program Update2008-Until 2008, no wild wolves had been confirmed west of the DPS boundary in Washington or Oregon. However, in July 2008, a wolf pack (2 adults and 6 pups) was discovered near Twisp, WA (just east of the North Cascades and west of the DPS boundary). Genetic testing showed these wolves did not originate from the NRM DPS; instead they apparently dispersed southward from the wolf population in southcentral British Columbiahttp://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/mammals/wolf/annualrpt08/FINAL_2008_USFWS_Recovery_Program_Update_3-17-09.pdfJuly 24, 2008 DNA tests showed that the wolves originated from a population in the northern British Columbia and Alberta provinces of Canada.“This is a natural colonization,” said Fitkin. “The wolves are naturally immigrating.”http://www.conservationnw.org/news/pressroom/press-clips/dna-samples-confirm-gray-wolves-are-back-in-methow-valleyJun 25, 2013-“DNA obtained from Lookout Pack wolves has shown they are descendents of wolves living in coastal British Columbia”, who lived separately from inland wolves for many generations, “Conservation Northwest” said in a press release. http://methowvalleynews.com/2013/06/25/will-federal-delisting-impact-states-wolves/ I can't tell you where they came from, and neither can you. To speculate the conspiracy theories doesn't make them true or false. I won't speculate, and I'll admit when I don't know something, like their origin in WA. Do I have ideas? Sure, like everyone else does. But I don't deal in guesses or speculation.
Quote from: CAMPMEAT on December 24, 2015, 09:58:17 PMWhat do you do for a living Muledeer ?I don't know why these pictures are flipped ? Please turn it for me, thanks !I work for a national non-profit conservation group.I put a post on here when I first joined to appease all the ones who thought I was some kind of spy. I haven't kept anything secret on here, including my job, cell phone number and home address. Ask many of the people on this forum whom I've worked with for wildlife over the last nearly 20 years to hear from them who I am and what I do. That way you don't have to take my word for it. Lots of guys on here have known me for a long time and been on many projects, events, releases, trappings, etc, etc. with me.And what do you do for a living?
I remember as a child, my aunt adopted a gray wolf for me with 'wolf-haven' that used to be in Olympia. Unfortunately they went bankrupt and was ordered to release their wolves into the wild. This is hard to say because I'm sure most here disagree, but I like that WA has wolves. One of only a few states that do. Coyotes on the other hand, go to town reducing their population....Just my opinion.
Quote from: EmeraldBullet on December 26, 2015, 05:54:59 PMI remember as a child, my aunt adopted a gray wolf for me with 'wolf-haven' that used to be in Olympia. Unfortunately they went bankrupt and was ordered to release their wolves into the wild. This is hard to say because I'm sure most here disagree, but I like that WA has wolves. One of only a few states that do. Coyotes on the other hand, go to town reducing their population....Just my opinion. You'll fit right in with the wolf lovers on here. Welcome to the site and the ride you'll get...