Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: link=topic=188564.msg2489684#msg2489684 date=1451164642The 243 and up were all to big in my opinion. The little 6.5 was enough for any small critters I may encounter
Awesome...thank you for all the input. Was leaning towards the 22-250, and I think after reading a lot of the input I may go with that choice.
Quote from: yorketransport on December 27, 2015, 10:57:45 AMQuote from: link=topic=188564.msg2489684#msg2489684 date=1451164642The 243 and up were all to big in my opinion. The little 6.5 was enough for any small critters I may encounter The 6.5 (.264) is bigger than the .243
6.5 Grendel..................................... Too soon
.223 --->26 NoslerThat escalated quickly
I'd definitely go with the 204 Ruger. Although the 223 is nice to have due to all the cheap factory ammo available for it. It would do the job as well. The 204 Ruger just has a bit more of the "cool factor." 22-250 is faster than needed and I wouldn't choose it if you want small holes.