Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: Oh Mah on January 06, 2016, 10:34:42 PMQuote from: Fl0und3rz on January 06, 2016, 06:33:58 PMTwo differences of note with the OR situation. OR adversary is the government, and they are breaking the law, I am supposing. TX adversaries are everyday citizens that happen upon this group on a public thoroughfare, by all appearances, and as noted, it is unclear whether they are breaking the law.It appears they have gone beyond the 2A in OR, and may have in TX.This is said in full understanding that armed resistance to tyranny is the raison d'être of the 2A. Neither OR or TX fits that justification for armed resistance.could you list the laws that are being broken in Oregon so that we can better understand your argument?I take it for granted that unlicensed armed entry and occupation of a federal facility is unlawful, as is refusing lawful commands to cease said occupation. Don't you? I am sure congress made some laws. I should ask you to prove the converse so we can understand your reluctance to accept that as reality.
Quote from: Fl0und3rz on January 06, 2016, 06:33:58 PMTwo differences of note with the OR situation. OR adversary is the government, and they are breaking the law, I am supposing. TX adversaries are everyday citizens that happen upon this group on a public thoroughfare, by all appearances, and as noted, it is unclear whether they are breaking the law.It appears they have gone beyond the 2A in OR, and may have in TX.This is said in full understanding that armed resistance to tyranny is the raison d'être of the 2A. Neither OR or TX fits that justification for armed resistance.could you list the laws that are being broken in Oregon so that we can better understand your argument?
Two differences of note with the OR situation. OR adversary is the government, and they are breaking the law, I am supposing. TX adversaries are everyday citizens that happen upon this group on a public thoroughfare, by all appearances, and as noted, it is unclear whether they are breaking the law.It appears they have gone beyond the 2A in OR, and may have in TX.This is said in full understanding that armed resistance to tyranny is the raison d'être of the 2A. Neither OR or TX fits that justification for armed resistance.
You tell me.