collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Purpose of true spike units?  (Read 10478 times)

Offline PlateauNDN

  • Y.A.R. Medicine Man
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 10691
  • Location: God's Country
  • R.I.P. Colockumelk 20130423. Semper Fi!
Re: Purpose of true spike units?
« Reply #15 on: January 02, 2016, 04:44:27 PM »
Tag system period.if the yaks got  one tag  that was open year round I'd be OK with it . Take the one you want and be done . No reason a deer and elk per adult wouldn't be enough for a familly. Heck throw a wild horse in too.

Blasphemy! My 2 baby girls eat thru an elk themselves. I fight them for seconds. :chuckle: I would honestly support 2 male per species sept 1 thru dec 31. and females no limit same time period. Ceremonial hunts limited to females species.
If you can read thank a teacher, If you can read in English thank a Marine! 
Not as Lean, Just as Mean, Still a Marine!
He who shed blood with me shall forever be my brother!

"Around this camp, there's only one Chief; the rest are Indians!"

"Give me 15 more minutes, I was dreaming of Beavers!"

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8821
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: Purpose of true spike units?
« Reply #16 on: January 02, 2016, 04:49:36 PM »
Tag system period.if the yaks got  one tag  that was open year round I'd be OK with it . Take the one you want and be done . No reason a deer and elk per adult wouldn't be enough for a familly. Heck throw a wild horse in too.

Blasphemy! My 2 baby girls eat thru an elk themselves. I fight them for seconds. :chuckle: I would honestly support 2 male per species sept 1 thru dec 31. and females no limit same time period. Ceremonial hunts limited to females species.
I bet you would      ....... I can't say I'd be any different  in giving in on any rights I had ..... the difference is some Indians  pull the trigger plat .... gotta be a happy spot between one and twenty seven bulls.

Offline PlateauNDN

  • Y.A.R. Medicine Man
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 10691
  • Location: God's Country
  • R.I.P. Colockumelk 20130423. Semper Fi!
Re: Purpose of true spike units?
« Reply #17 on: January 02, 2016, 05:04:05 PM »
Tag system period.if the yaks got  one tag  that was open year round I'd be OK with it . Take the one you want and be done . No reason a deer and elk per adult wouldn't be enough for a familly. Heck throw a wild horse in too.

Blasphemy! My 2 baby girls eat thru an elk themselves. I fight them for seconds. :chuckle: I would honestly support 2 male per species sept 1 thru dec 31. and females no limit same time period. Ceremonial hunts limited to females species.
I bet you would      ....... I can't say I'd be any different  in giving in on any rights I had ..... the difference is some Indians  pull the trigger plat .... gotta be a happy spot between one and twenty seven bulls.

I know Coach, it's not a question of giving up rights but regulating them. My argument to our officials has been that if there's seasons and regulations for salmon and other anadronomous fish the why not big game as well.

There's less big game numbers then fish but yet we allow the unregulated harvesting of them? We regulate moose, big horn sheep and mountain goats but not deer or elk?

Again, I'm not saying give up rights but regulate the harvest numbers to allow sustainability of the herds.

Self-control isn't difficult.
If you can read thank a teacher, If you can read in English thank a Marine! 
Not as Lean, Just as Mean, Still a Marine!
He who shed blood with me shall forever be my brother!

"Around this camp, there's only one Chief; the rest are Indians!"

"Give me 15 more minutes, I was dreaming of Beavers!"

Offline danderson

  • Hunter Education Instructor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 1702
  • Location: Central Wash
    • elkhornarchers
Re: Purpose of true spike units?
« Reply #18 on: January 02, 2016, 05:20:46 PM »
  The reason for the true spike rule has been discussed in prior threads, well documented and debated with lots of good points from all sides, not sure if sound game management can influence the bull to cow ratio when out side influences effect there goals, I know for a fact that more deer and elk get killed on the roads between Easton and Ellensburg annually than get harvested legally by hunting, throw in tribal harvest, poaching, miss-identification, depredation from predators, Bigfoot, aliens-its a very complicated issue
 

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39202
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Purpose of true spike units?
« Reply #19 on: January 02, 2016, 05:30:57 PM »
It should be an any bull season with a limit on the number harvested either by limited permits or a quota. But yes, in addition to that there needs to also be a limit to how many the tribal hunters can take.

Plat said a limit of two Bulls would be good, and I'd be fine with that. But I definitely don't agree with no limit on cows.

I couldn't disagree more with the spike only rule. Dumbest thing ever. If it's such a good management strategy then let's go to spike only for mule deer.

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8821
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: Purpose of true spike units?
« Reply #20 on: January 02, 2016, 05:35:36 PM »
Some times  it's too simple to accomplish. As far as I know  the  Yakima tribe get fifty percent of the harvest in there ceded lands . Now the problem with this is there is no limit on spikes or three point bucks therfore no way of knowing what fifty percent may be. Simple  use harvest data to allocate a real number to go by ..... say 200 elk get killed the next season allow 200 triple harvests.  Let the Yakima allocate a number of those tags to other tribes in a manner they see fit . Every elk and deer gets tagged . I feel this number would be reasonable and the department  of game could set seasons and limits with real data and a partnership with the tribe. The tribe could had out the tags as needed and my bet is one member wouldn't shoot 27 bulls in a season .

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Purpose of true spike units?
« Reply #21 on: January 03, 2016, 05:02:50 AM »
Definitely getting closer coach.   I believe the colvilles are one elk per member per year.  That's perfect.  I also like their season close dates.   I don't think animals should be hunted after December 31st.   Give em a break.  Its kind of hard to manange any wildlife if you don't have any data.  Coach has some good ideas.   Get a tag and turn it in.  Not sure why its so far fetched for the Yaks to self regulate and participate in sound management.   The colvilles are set up very similar and have a great game management program.  Sometimes I think they overharvest a bit,  but they flex or at least make an attempt to.

Offline matt509

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 16
  • Location: Yakima
Re: Purpose of true spike units?
« Reply #22 on: January 05, 2016, 10:09:51 AM »
The tribal hunters should be allowed to do whatever they want whenever they want on reservation land.  If they intend to harvest off the reservation, they should be required to do so in a more primitive manner, similar to the way their elders did.  It should be limited to archery.  The ancestors never had rifles/optics combinations that were capable of long range shots.

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Purpose of true spike units?
« Reply #23 on: January 05, 2016, 01:43:22 PM »
Excellent point Bone and thanks for shedding some light on this for me DOUBLELUNG. During the big game meetings does this issue ever get brought up that we are essentially creating extra opportunities for our co-managers??
Oh yes, and sometimes rather heatedly.  I think any restrictions on tribal harvest other than as imposed by the tribal councils is a non-starter, just my opinion.  The only real, actionable option is less motorized access on public lands.
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

Offline HUNTaHOLIC5

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 372
  • Location: Anchorage/Yakima
Re: Purpose of true spike units?
« Reply #24 on: January 05, 2016, 01:58:28 PM »
The tribal hunters should be allowed to do whatever they want whenever they want on reservation land.  If they intend to harvest off the reservation, they should be required to do so in a more primitive manner, similar to the way their elders did.  It should be limited to archery.  The ancestors never had rifles/optics combinations that were capable of long range shots.
So you would agree with anti gunners that the second amendment doesn't apply to modern weapons amd it only protects weapons in that era? I'm sure you don't but it's the same thing.

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51553
  • Location: E. WA
Re: Purpose of true spike units?
« Reply #25 on: January 05, 2016, 02:09:20 PM »
$

Offline steeleywhopper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1670
  • Location: Snohomish co.
Re: Purpose of true spike units?
« Reply #26 on: January 05, 2016, 02:12:02 PM »
True Spike was put into effect to make me switch to West Side Archery. I am officially converting to West Side elk hunting as of 2016.
Politicians like Jay Inslee are the reason we have the 2nd Amendment

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

If this is your trap by SWHUNTER
[Yesterday at 10:50:36 PM]


WA Moose scouting by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 10:42:18 PM]


JBLM Archery by Carwash
[Yesterday at 10:20:12 PM]


William o Douglas lakes by buggy
[Yesterday at 10:12:58 PM]


JBLM by Carwash
[Yesterday at 10:08:39 PM]


Looking for Solid 22 LR input by run870
[Yesterday at 09:15:50 PM]


Teanaway bull elk by Stein
[Yesterday at 09:14:42 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by Vandal44
[Yesterday at 07:10:03 PM]


3 days for Kings by Parasite
[Yesterday at 07:02:37 PM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by dvolmer
[Yesterday at 06:30:50 PM]


Raffle ticket sales 2025 by greenhead_killer
[Yesterday at 06:18:45 PM]


Yakima bow shop by maxwell
[Yesterday at 05:41:04 PM]


Cell cam recommendation for security? by Stein
[Yesterday at 05:01:50 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by Sakko300wsm
[Yesterday at 03:55:08 PM]


The end? Bird bands. by hdshot
[Yesterday at 03:44:43 PM]


North Sea Fishing trip by BLH69
[Yesterday at 02:05:14 PM]


2025 Crab! by BLH69
[Yesterday at 02:02:40 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by MMCCAULEY
[Yesterday at 09:25:10 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by CNELK
[Yesterday at 07:31:32 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal