Free: Contests & Raffles.
I keep seeing over and over the talk of too long of hunting seasons, yes that would contribute if it were an over populated hunt, but that isn't the case there are too few permits given out and if it is hard hunted how many really get far off any road? What happens back east when they get over run by whitetails? they kill off the population until it can equalize oout to the habitat it lives in. Thw WDFW is failing to control the population in a manner that is for positive conservation of this herd. I still feel they fail to admit this and with presures from an ignorant anti hunting populus. Until they go in aclear out the herd to a managable level we'll just be throwing away money on feed that could be used in other areas
Raising awareness is one thing and bringing up habitat loss and such is something I agree with. However, blaming us hunters for being part of the problem, when our purchases, fund habitat, and our game taking relieves some of the pressure on less habitat, is wrong! You want to point the blame, point it where it belongs, at the government, and the liberal mentality. Elk need food, they eat grass. Grass will not grow in standing timber, only in open areas, clearcuts, etc..... Ban logging in this country and the elk habitat dies. The reason elk have flourished in years past is due to logging operations clearing the land, so grass can grow until the newly planted trees grow. By the time new trees kill off the grass and vegetation, there are new clearcuts, and open areas with lots of feed. It is funny(not really) that most of the starving elk are coming out of the National Forest? While elk on Weyerhauser and other private timber company land are flourishing for the most part? Guess I need to get off my soapbox now.
Can you answer any of the concerns that we are asking about? We all want to help the elk, but we don't want to shoot ourselves in the foot either.
HuntBear,The blame falls on the WDFW. They are allowing over persuit of these animals.I think we are on the same team here. "Our vision would be to secure a future of recreational opportunities for our wilderness areas in Southwest Washington for hunting, snowmobiling, horseback riding, hiking, ATV riding, etc."-Mt. Saint Helens Rescue
Ok KillzElk, from my experience dealing with special interest groups and wording here is my take on teh way his website it worded and what his words are.Mt Helens preservation - (The name states preservation which means no use by definition) Preservation means no use. No hunting, no target shooting, no hiking, no or limited camping, etc.His wording in the video states that hunters are a predominate cause of the starvation.This is my interpretation of his words directly from his mouth and website. I am not the only one that apparently thinks this also. His heart may be inthe right place, but his words are not. If he in fact wants to help conservation methods to help the elk and get that help from hunters and outdoorsmen perhaps a better angle can be approached. As it stands it sounds to me like the many hundreds of animal rights websites that seek to keep hunters out of "their" areas.I asked him to reiterate his views on this site and in emails and it has been skirted. So until I am sure I am not funding an animal rights agenda I cannot support him. I can do what I can do, but I cant fund animal rights lobbys who alrady gain 300 million dollars a year to keep us out of "their" areas. 300 million dollars will buy a lot of hay and alfalfa but generally the money doesnt go to these kinds of issues, it goes to building corporate offices, summer homes, and BMWs.It is unfortunate that the elk are in the position they are in and that a certain area will only hold so many animals. That being said we dont know, or I dont know, what they push for in their "private" meetings. We have enough problems without supporting groups that are fighting against our privileges to hunt. Once again it is unfortunate that the elk are stuck in this predicament, but if the groups are not supportive of hunting and conservation methods then perhaps another group or agency should be targeted to help.Once again if someone from the groups wants to clarify what they are saying I will listen. I have asked a couple times already to clarify their stance on hunting and sportmsmen but have received nothing. To me however their mission statement is unclear on what side of the fence they are on as far as hunting and sportsmen are concerned.
Anyone else notice how many questions this bbarnes is not answering??? Or the fact that KillzElk has only posted to this thread and is like the voice of bbarnes?!?! Something is very fishy about this whole thing!