collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: New wolf study from U of W  (Read 4083 times)

Offline PLUVIUSWAPITI

  • local 2776
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 332
  • Location: East Raymond
New wolf study from U of W
« on: February 16, 2016, 06:23:17 PM »
« Last Edit: February 16, 2016, 07:12:00 PM by bearpaw »

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin

Offline PLUVIUSWAPITI

  • local 2776
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 332
  • Location: East Raymond
Re: New wolf study from U of W
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2016, 07:13:36 PM »
Thanks lokidog.

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38437
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: New wolf study from U of W
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2016, 07:21:25 PM »
I had to laugh at Wielgus' comment about the study!  :chuckle:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21732
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: New wolf study from U of W
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2016, 07:27:52 PM »
I had to laugh at Wielgus' comment about the study!  :chuckle:
"“The authors are not wildlife biologists; they’ve never studied wolves,” said Wielgus."

Which should have nothing to do with valid statistical data analysis.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38437
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: New wolf study from U of W
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2016, 07:40:17 PM »
I had to laugh at Wielgus' comment about the study!  :chuckle:
"“The authors are not wildlife biologists; they’ve never studied wolves,” said Wielgus."

Which should have nothing to do with valid statistical data analysis.

This exactly what we need, some studies to counter his questionable studies! He's the guy who WDFW has modeled our abysmal cougar management around his studies!
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21732
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: New wolf study from U of W
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2016, 07:46:41 PM »
I think it would take an agenda to conclude that fewer wolves would result in more livestock attacks.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38437
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: New wolf study from U of W
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2016, 08:00:39 PM »
I think it would take an agenda to conclude that fewer wolves would result in more livestock attacks.

Ya think!  :chuckle:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: New wolf study from U of W
« Reply #8 on: February 17, 2016, 05:34:47 AM »
I had to laugh at Wielgus' comment about the study!  :chuckle:
"“The authors are not wildlife biologists; they’ve never studied wolves,” said Wielgus."

Which should have nothing to do with valid statistical data analysis.

This exactly what we need, some studies to counter his questionable studies! He's the guy who WDFW has modeled our abysmal cougar management around his studies!
He is a joke.  The WDFW hates that wolf "research" that he did. 

There are lots of holes in it....

I am glad someone came up with some reviewes literature to debunk it.  Montana did some food stuff too, thier research basically blew it apart a few months ago.

Offline grundy53

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 12854
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Learn something new everyday.
    • facebook
Re: New wolf study from U of W
« Reply #9 on: February 17, 2016, 06:05:07 AM »
The only time I will root for UW over WSU. :chuckle:

Sent from my E6782 using Tapatalk

Molôn Labé
Can you skin Grizz?

The opinions expressed in my posts do not represent those of the forum.

Offline nwwanderer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4678
Re: New wolf study from U of W
« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2016, 08:14:08 AM »
As a WSU grad with a fair amount of wildlife biology this is tough to take but go for it Dawgs.  On a side note WDFW might not want to comment on 'biological impossibilities" as they have stated many times in public forums that his wolf problem just can not be happening before 2020.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21732
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: New wolf study from U of W
« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2016, 08:21:38 AM »
Dawgs v. Dogs. Go Dawgs.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Oregon Seed #'s by Crunchy
[Today at 04:44:31 PM]


WDFW falsely advertising preference points by hunter399
[Today at 04:38:43 PM]


Oregon spring bear by Doublelunger
[Today at 02:05:20 PM]


Black Eagle arrows deals by kodiak06
[Today at 02:02:59 PM]


Burrowing Animal by Hilltop123
[Today at 01:50:46 PM]


2025 Multiseason Deer General? by Goshawk
[Today at 12:23:10 PM]


Last year putting in… by Dirtnap
[Today at 11:48:14 AM]


Colorado Results by vandeman17
[Today at 10:20:27 AM]


What's flatbed pickup life like? by Special T
[Today at 10:19:28 AM]


Tag issues with "Get Outdoors" package by Encore 280
[Today at 08:54:30 AM]


.300 Win Mag Rounds by W.Goomsba
[Today at 08:29:32 AM]


Shout out to Talley Manufacturing by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 09:56:57 PM]


Knight ridge runner by Irish_hunter93
[Yesterday at 09:43:04 PM]


Halibut fishing by hiway_99
[Yesterday at 08:10:49 PM]


Desert Sheds by aer212
[Yesterday at 07:21:58 PM]


Finally found him! by zwickeyman
[Yesterday at 05:45:27 PM]


Vantage Bridge by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 04:58:46 PM]


Nevada Results by High Climber
[Yesterday at 04:51:37 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal