Free: Contests & Raffles.
One thing I have often wondered is how many people in Washington buy an elk tag to apply, but never actually hunt if not drawn. I was talking to some guys that said that is what they do. Buy tags to apply, but basically just hunt deer half of the years. Was totally incomprehensible to me But made me wonder...?
I really don't understand the waiting till you draw a tag to hunt bulls theory.....i mean give or take on the unit, after 15 years of waiting you still only have a 5ish percent chance to draw a tag....and thats rounding up usually! Then once you get a tag you still have a typically less then 25% chance of even filling that tag ? Let alone with a big bull ?? So your going to plan on shooting one maybe two big bulls I'm your life ? Doesn't really seem like a recipe for success Obviously if you can afford to put in for ten different states so you draw an upper tear tag ever year youl do alil better but I'm just talking the average guy here in Washington
Odell that's not a bad idea. I always apply for tags so makes no difference to me but to jot put infor permits and have the whole state to hunt is an interesting thought.
Quote from: bbarnes on March 01, 2016, 09:33:38 AMIt will give all of us more area to hunt, spread out hunters,and also be less pressure on the elk herds.Also you would be able to apply for tags,on both sides of the state,and no be forced to hunt that side if not drawn.This would be a big revenue increase to the WDFW,with more tags to draw for.Personally I don't see a downside to it.Downside is that when folks don't draw eastside branch antlered bull tags they'd all head west to hunt bulls rather than hunt spike bulls. There are hardly any good quality permit hunts on this side, so what would happen is everyone would apply for eastside permits and hunt the westside when they don't draw. People complain about a lack of good quality westside permits all the time. This idea would sure solve that problem, but would cause overcrowding on the westside. Just my
It will give all of us more area to hunt, spread out hunters,and also be less pressure on the elk herds.Also you would be able to apply for tags,on both sides of the state,and no be forced to hunt that side if not drawn.This would be a big revenue increase to the WDFW,with more tags to draw for.Personally I don't see a downside to it.
I would not support that idea. I would support choosing sides for deer like we do for elk..so the East side mule deer would not get hammered as hard.
Quote from: C-Money on March 01, 2016, 10:25:20 AMI would not support that idea. I would support choosing sides for deer like we do for elk..so the East side mule deer would not get hammered as hard.
Quote from: T Pearce on March 28, 2016, 08:49:24 PMQuote from: C-Money on March 01, 2016, 10:25:20 AMI would not support that idea. I would support choosing sides for deer like we do for elk..so the East side mule deer would not get hammered as hard. The west side might get a break though as well. Early season everyone heads east, then they shoot spikes and 2 points during the late buck hunt on the west side.
Quote from: Duckslayer89 on March 28, 2016, 09:17:56 PMQuote from: T Pearce on March 28, 2016, 08:49:24 PMQuote from: C-Money on March 01, 2016, 10:25:20 AMI would not support that idea. I would support choosing sides for deer like we do for elk..so the East side mule deer would not get hammered as hard. The west side might get a break though as well. Early season everyone heads east, then they shoot spikes and 2 points during the late buck hunt on the west side.