collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Barnes bullets supporting lead ammunition bans!  (Read 14723 times)

Offline JDHasty

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 6994
  • Location: Tacoma
  • Groups: NRA Benefactor Member, GOA Life Member, Father of 3 NRA Life Members
Barnes bullets supporting lead ammunition bans!
« on: March 10, 2016, 05:51:47 AM »
Make certain to use the Fed 215 primers w/the 300 Wby.  It is practically essential.

Regarding the TTSX, I will never purchase any Barnes product ever.  I used to run SPORTCO's hunting/shooting counter ~ 25 years ago and at that time Barnes was busy lobbying the legislatures and game departments of practically all western States to go "lead free."  I have nothing against a business trying to increase their market share by building a better product, but trying to legislate market share is despicable.     
« Last Edit: March 10, 2016, 10:32:35 AM by bearpaw »

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Re: 300 weatherby
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2016, 05:55:01 AM »
Wow, I hadn't heard that.  Not good!
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline JDHasty

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 6994
  • Location: Tacoma
  • Groups: NRA Benefactor Member, GOA Life Member, Father of 3 NRA Life Members
Re: Re: 300 weatherby
« Reply #2 on: March 10, 2016, 08:08:44 AM »
Wow, I hadn't heard that.  Not good!

I used to go to WDFW mid-day public meetings when I had that job and the same guys who were in SPORTCO trying to get us to pick up their X-bullet product on Wednesday were at the meeting going all in to get lead banned on Thursday.  And make no mistake about it, the topic was shotgun ammo and these guys from Barnes were advocating for a ban on all lead in ammo for sporting use period.   

I used their 348 bullet from their original line and once the ones I had on hand were used up I have used the Woodleighs in their place.  I shoot mostly cast bullets out of it and will use Hornady 200 gr for deer.   

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 8994
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: Re: 300 weatherby
« Reply #3 on: March 10, 2016, 08:11:06 AM »
Wow, I hadn't heard that.  Not good!

 :yeah: once I confirm this I am throwing all Barnes bullets in the trash.  Partly for that reason and partly because I am sick of cleaning after 6 shots
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline JDHasty

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 6994
  • Location: Tacoma
  • Groups: NRA Benefactor Member, GOA Life Member, Father of 3 NRA Life Members
Re: Re: 300 weatherby
« Reply #4 on: March 10, 2016, 08:20:57 AM »
Wow, I hadn't heard that.  Not good!

 :yeah: once I confirm this I am throwing all Barnes bullets in the trash.  Partly for that reason and partly because I am sick of cleaning after 6 shots

I practically exploded after sitting there and listening to their BS.  They had shown up with their local rep at SPORTCO unannounced and were extolling the virtues of their X-bullet and then when they showed up at a WDFW public meeting that had nothing to do with their X-bullet, but had expanding the non-toxic shot shell requirement and they took that as license to advocate on behalf of a ban on all lead in sporting ammo I was so pissed of that I called every competitor in the State and let them know what these jerks were up to.  That was ~ 1988 - 1990 just a few years after the time their X-bullet came out.   I had used Colorado Custom/Barnes Originals up until that time, but swore I would never purchase another thing from them.     

Offline theleo

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 1212
  • Location: Kennewick
Re: Re: 300 weatherby
« Reply #5 on: March 10, 2016, 08:43:59 AM »
Wow, I hadn't heard that.  Not good!

You don't keep track of Oregon game law issues. The Oregon ZOO, a decidedly anti hunter organization, has teamed up with Barnes and ODFW to put on presentations of the evils of lead core bullets. There's a movement to make Oregon a lead free state and Barnes is there as a representative of the fire arms industry pushing their agenda. Not even Oregon based Nosler is showing any support, but Barnes sure is. If they pass it in Oregon it will just be a matter of time before they start pushing the lead free ammo agenda here.   

Offline JDHasty

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 6994
  • Location: Tacoma
  • Groups: NRA Benefactor Member, GOA Life Member, Father of 3 NRA Life Members
Re: Re: 300 weatherby
« Reply #6 on: March 10, 2016, 08:48:46 AM »
Wow, I hadn't heard that.  Not good!

You don't keep track of Oregon game law issues. The Oregon ZOO, a decidedly anti hunter organization, has teamed up with Barnes and ODFW to put on presentations of the evils of lead core bullets. There's a movement to make Oregon a lead free state and Barnes is there as a representative of the fire arms industry pushing their agenda. Not even Oregon based Nosler is showing any support, but Barnes sure is. If they pass it in Oregon it will just be a matter of time before they start pushing the lead free ammo agenda here.

Barnes Bullets should be something that no sportsman should ever spend a dime on.  I was there and I was enraged at not only their tactics, but the lies they were telling.  They are absolute filth.   

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Re: 300 weatherby
« Reply #7 on: March 10, 2016, 09:52:45 AM »
Was this Randy Brooks? If not, let's get their response to this. We need to know if it's a corporate decision or one rep trying to up his market.

Offline JDHasty

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 6994
  • Location: Tacoma
  • Groups: NRA Benefactor Member, GOA Life Member, Father of 3 NRA Life Members
Re: Re: 300 weatherby
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2016, 09:57:58 AM »
Was this Randy Brooks? If not, let's get their response to this. We need to know if it's a corporate decision or one rep trying to up his market.

Yes in my case it was.  The rep was a local guy, the Barnes people came out of Colorado all glad handing and back slapping and handing out "free samples" and swag like ball caps, t-shirts, etc and offering to take me to lunch.  When they saw me at the WDFW meeting the next day they about dumped in their pants.     

Offline JDHasty

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 6994
  • Location: Tacoma
  • Groups: NRA Benefactor Member, GOA Life Member, Father of 3 NRA Life Members
Re: Re: 300 weatherby
« Reply #9 on: March 10, 2016, 10:04:43 AM »
Wow, I hadn't heard that.  Not good!

You don't keep track of Oregon game law issues. The Oregon ZOO, a decidedly anti hunter organization, has teamed up with Barnes and ODFW to put on presentations of the evils of lead core bullets. There's a movement to make Oregon a lead free state and Barnes is there as a representative of the fire arms industry pushing their agenda. Not even Oregon based Nosler is showing any support, but Barnes sure is. If they pass it in Oregon it will just be a matter of time before they start pushing the lead free ammo agenda here.

In the meeting I was at it was Barnes who was the ring leader.  "Environmental groups" like Sierra Club as well as WDFW and the rest of the "alphabet Agencies" were all allowing them to take the lead. 

Offline JDHasty

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 6994
  • Location: Tacoma
  • Groups: NRA Benefactor Member, GOA Life Member, Father of 3 NRA Life Members
Re: Re: 300 weatherby
« Reply #10 on: March 10, 2016, 10:14:25 AM »
Whatya' say we repost this topic some where else so the OP can get the help he needs and we can discuss this further. 

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38450
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Barnes bullets supporting lead ammunition bans!
« Reply #11 on: March 10, 2016, 10:33:21 AM »
Topic is split, please continue! I really want to hear more!  :yike:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3486
  • Location: west coast
Re: Barnes bullets supporting lead ammunition bans!
« Reply #12 on: March 10, 2016, 10:39:26 AM »
Wow, i had planned on shooting a few more animals with big led style bullets then swap to the small solid and fast barnes to see which of the two theories I prefer

Not any more

Offline predatorpro

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 1719
  • Location: Wenatchee, WA
Re: Barnes bullets supporting lead ammunition bans!
« Reply #13 on: March 10, 2016, 10:41:12 AM »
I still wouldn't buy any of their bullets....

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 8994
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: Barnes bullets supporting lead ammunition bans!
« Reply #14 on: March 10, 2016, 10:43:53 AM »
Wow, i had planned on shooting a few more animals with big led style bullets then swap to the small solid and fast barnes to see which of the two theories I prefer

Not any more

 :yeah: I think I'd rather shoot backwards powerbelts
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Hoof Rot by kentrek
[Today at 03:50:07 PM]


Eastern WA-WT hunting from tree stands?? by Feathernfurr
[Today at 03:44:11 PM]


Honda BF15A Outboard Problems by CP
[Today at 01:36:59 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by HighlandLofts
[Today at 12:01:17 PM]


Bow mount trolling motors by GWP
[Today at 11:29:07 AM]


where is everyone? by nwwanderer
[Today at 11:12:50 AM]


Oregon special tag info by JakeLand
[Today at 10:27:35 AM]


Another great day in the turkey woods. by rosscrazyelk
[Today at 09:38:55 AM]


Get ready for the 4th of July by rosscrazyelk
[Today at 09:36:56 AM]


Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 09:15:32 AM]


Wolf documentary PBS by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 09:09:55 AM]


Idaho Mt goat draft plan by time2hunt
[Today at 07:59:04 AM]


Cougar Problems Toroda Creek Road Near Bodie by Elkaholic daWg
[Today at 07:52:17 AM]


Disabled Fishing License by Blacklab
[Today at 07:44:43 AM]


Ever win the WDFW Big Game Raffle? by jackelope
[Today at 07:18:59 AM]


Missoula Fishing by borntoslay
[Yesterday at 11:30:10 PM]


Buck age by borntoslay
[Yesterday at 11:08:41 PM]


Iceberg shrimp closed by Tbar
[Yesterday at 10:55:37 PM]


Fun little Winchester 1890 project by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 07:36:21 PM]


2025 NWTF Jakes Day by wadu1
[Yesterday at 07:28:59 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal