Free: Contests & Raffles.
Nice buck but why do guys have to shove them out toward the camera like that
Quote from: huntnphool on January 06, 2009, 05:54:18 PMNice buck but why do guys have to shove them out toward the camera like that They do that to make it look wider. it is a big ass deer tho.
Quote from: wastickslinger on December 10, 2008, 10:46:14 PMCurious to see a legit score on this one. I just dont see 200" with those weak backs. I agree that 185 looks more like it. None the less, great buck!!This is just his opinion Hornhunter, he is entitled to post it. You believe the buck to be 200 and he thinks 185, nothing wrong with having differences of opinion.I think its beautiful and unique buck as well and would have given him a dirt nap as well. That being said I think the pic is a bit deceiving. For one the ears have been pulled back, this pose gives you nothing to base your width measurement aspect. I think his G2's, backs, are pretty decent, its his G3's that are weak IMHO. For a buck to score in the upper 180's he has to have several things but a good rule of thumb for a typical frame is 18" G2's and 12" G3's and G4's, this is just the start of things to look at when field judging mule deer. I would put this buck in the low 160 class before adding his extras. A solid Washington buck for certain but I don't see anything close to 200 myself.
Curious to see a legit score on this one. I just dont see 200" with those weak backs. I agree that 185 looks more like it. None the less, great buck!!
I met up with Elkstuffer this afternoon. We had an evening glassing session.(no Fog) We didn't see any big Bucks but elkstuffer saw 3 this mourning.The hunters are still seeing Good Bucks. A double drop tine Buck was taken yesterday!!! I looked at a picture of it and it looks to go high 190s maybe 200? It's hard to tell from the pics. He has good fronts but weak forks in the back but they are really tall. Oh ya plus 2-12" droppers!!!