Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: Alchase on September 07, 2016, 11:23:51 AMQuoteWe are talking about a trophy bull elk being POACHED by a guy that spends a lot of money each year at auctions and in the raffle.And has a history of flaunting hunting regulations.Fixed it for youThe amount of money he spends on raffles and auctions should have no more bearing on this case then how much he spends on underwear.....Shooting a 2 point in a 3 point or better GMUorShooting a trophy branched antler bull in a closed GMUboth = poachingWhy are you trying to diminish what he is accused of?We need a sarcasm emoji.
QuoteWe are talking about a trophy bull elk being POACHED by a guy that spends a lot of money each year at auctions and in the raffle.And has a history of flaunting hunting regulations.Fixed it for youThe amount of money he spends on raffles and auctions should have no more bearing on this case then how much he spends on underwear.....Shooting a 2 point in a 3 point or better GMUorShooting a trophy branched antler bull in a closed GMUboth = poachingWhy are you trying to diminish what he is accused of?
We are talking about a trophy bull elk being POACHED by a guy that spends a lot of money each year at auctions and in the raffle.And has a history of flaunting hunting regulations.
Quote from: bobcat on September 07, 2016, 10:49:08 AMInnocent until proven guilty only applies for those who have lots of money. Otherwise, you would expect, like most anyone else, the rifle used to kill the bull would have been confiscated, the bull itself would have been taken, perhaps even the vehicle Reichert used when he was "hunting" this bull would have been taken. You hear about property being confiscated all the time in poaching cases. Funny how that didn't happen in this case.They confiscated the bull at his court appearance yesterday. Not sure about the weapon or any other property.
Innocent until proven guilty only applies for those who have lots of money. Otherwise, you would expect, like most anyone else, the rifle used to kill the bull would have been confiscated, the bull itself would have been taken, perhaps even the vehicle Reichert used when he was "hunting" this bull would have been taken. You hear about property being confiscated all the time in poaching cases. Funny how that didn't happen in this case.
This typical cluster will still be pending a year from now when the charged party is hunting on next year's tags. Just keep delaying the trial date, filing this and that and costing money. Someone should set up a pool as to when the trial actually occurs.
Any idea where he killed the sheep coach? I ran into him twice on the yakima river and he passed on two pretty good rams that day.
Quote from: jdb on October 31, 2016, 06:24:46 AMAny idea where he killed the sheep coach? I ran into him twice on the yakima river and he passed on two pretty good rams that day.Eaton Ranch
Quote from: JDHasty on October 31, 2016, 08:23:53 AMQuote from: jdb on October 31, 2016, 06:24:46 AMAny idea where he killed the sheep coach? I ran into him twice on the yakima river and he passed on two pretty good rams that day.Eaton RanchYou sure about that?