Free: Contests & Raffles.
TH, I had this tag the first year it came out. PM me with a phone number if you want.Ken
I still think it's stupid that WDFW encourages you to shoot the first goat you see but then that counts as your OIL goat. I put in for that tag but it would be state record with a bow or bust for me. I won't give up my chance at a Mt Baker tag for a lesser billy. Really hope WDFW changes the conflict reduction tag to make it the same as a ewe sheep or cow moose tag (I.e. doesnt count as your once in lifetime harvest.)
If it didn't count as oil they would get more harvest which would accomplish what they want which is a reduction of goats.
Quote from: shanevg on May 17, 2016, 09:59:37 PMI still think it's stupid that WDFW encourages you to shoot the first goat you see but then that counts as your OIL goat. I put in for that tag but it would be state record with a bow or bust for me. I won't give up my chance at a Mt Baker tag for a lesser billy. Really hope WDFW changes the conflict reduction tag to make it the same as a ewe sheep or cow moose tag (I.e. doesnt count as your once in lifetime harvest.)I totally disagree with you. I think its stupid that the state split up goat into different categories. Having 12,000 applicants for a total of 27 permits, the state should have left goat as 1 category and had a note on the Olympic permits that the hunt is a conflict hunt to reduce goat populations, that the goats can be few and far between and that hunter history has shown that hunter success in these areas has been substantially less than other areas. This way people would know there chance of success is low and that any goat harvest is OIL.