collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolves, a good thing?  (Read 52702 times)

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32890
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Wolves, a good thing?
« Reply #120 on: June 03, 2016, 01:15:09 PM »
My definition of "End Hunting": There is no longer any reasonable hunting opportunity available and this condition is expected to persist for the foreseeable future.  Game populations are so sparse that probability of harvest is nearly 0; the state has closed all seasons or no longer sells tags.

What is not "End Hunting": Shorter seasons, additional harvest restrictions (like stopping antlerless harvest), reduced harvest numbers from historic highs, reduced success rates.  While these are not desirable, they are a far cry from End Hunting.

Lets stop the exaggerated bs.  Just because the tree huggers do it doesn't mean we should.  Lets keep our credibility with the 80% of non-hunting voters in this country.

 Perfect, so I don't believe there is anybody on this site that truly believes wolves will "end hunting" :dunno: , however there is no doubt that wolves will result in shorter seasons, additional harvest restrictions, reduced harvest numbers and reduce success rates.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3602
Re: Wolves, a good thing?
« Reply #121 on: June 03, 2016, 01:22:43 PM »
My definition of "End Hunting": There is no longer any reasonable hunting opportunity available and this condition is expected to persist for the foreseeable future.  Game populations are so sparse that probability of harvest is nearly 0; the state has closed all seasons or no longer sells tags.

What is not "End Hunting": Shorter seasons, additional harvest restrictions (like stopping antlerless harvest), reduced harvest numbers from historic highs, reduced success rates.  While these are not desirable, they are a far cry from End Hunting.

Lets stop the exaggerated bs.  Just because the tree huggers do it doesn't mean we should.  Lets keep our credibility with the 80% of non-hunting voters in this country.

 Perfect, so I don't believe there is anybody on this site that truly believes wolves will "end hunting" :dunno: , however there is no doubt that wolves will result in shorter seasons, additional harvest restrictions, reduced harvest numbers and reduce success rates.
:tup:
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Wolves, a good thing?
« Reply #122 on: June 03, 2016, 01:25:24 PM »
And, won't most on here agree that wolves are then a bad thing?

I don't see how anyone can claim that wolves in this state are a "good thing"?  We all should be aware that management of wolves in this state will basically be/is non-existent. 
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32890
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Wolves, a good thing?
« Reply #123 on: June 03, 2016, 01:32:04 PM »
And, won't most on here agree that wolves are then a bad thing?

I don't see how anyone can claim that wolves in this state are a "good thing"?  We all should be aware that management of wolves in this state will basically be/is non-existent.

 They are being managed, SSS!
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline 257 Wby Mag

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1975
  • Location: Chehalis
Re: Wolves, a good thing?
« Reply #124 on: June 03, 2016, 04:00:03 PM »
And, won't most on here agree that wolves are then a bad thing?

I don't see how anyone can claim that wolves in this state are a "good thing"?  We all should be aware that management of wolves in this state will basically be/is non-existent.

 They are being managed, SSS!

I get it, breaking the law is cool if it's not a 400" bull or a 190" buck... Wow
Tod Riechert fan club.

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44640
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Wolves, a good thing?
« Reply #125 on: June 03, 2016, 04:10:01 PM »
A forty per cent reduction in opportunities for hunters is now " reasonable"?  And sportsmen should just shut up?

My definition of "End Hunting": There is no longer any reasonable hunting opportunity available and this condition is expected to persist for the foreseeable future.  Game populations are so sparse that probability of harvest is nearly 0; the state has closed all seasons or no longer sells tags.

What is not "End Hunting": Shorter seasons, additional harvest restrictions (like stopping antlerless harvest), reduced harvest numbers from historic highs, reduced success rates.  While these are not desirable, they are a far cry from End Hunting.

Lets stop the exaggerated bs.  Just because the tree huggers do it doesn't mean we should.  Lets keep our credibility with the 80% of non-hunting voters in this country.
Anyone who thinks a 40% reduction in hunting is acceptable really believes that hunting's not that important. What's the difference between 40% and 50%? Really, what's the difference between 40% or 80%. Most of us who've grown up hunting, do hunting-related activities year round, teach hunter's safety, save large sums of money for tags and trips and use our vacations, wish to someday take out grandkids hunting, don't find 40% acceptable because it isn't. It's 40 today, 80 tomorrow, and done with hunting completely in a very short period of time.

There will be a chain of events that starts with this 40%. Then a large number of hunters will lose confidence in the WDFW and stop hunting here altogether. Revenues from hunter dollars will fall drastically so the budget for the WDFW will begin to shift to the general fund more and more. As the general fund amount increases and hunter $s decrease, the emphasis on the WDFW's commitment to hunting will decrease and for the wolf watchers, will increase. This is a concerted effort to eliminate hunting and it will eventually succeed in WA.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline Kittman

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Posts: 527
  • Location: Oak Harbor
  • Groups: NRA, US Navy
Re: Wolves, a good thing?
« Reply #126 on: June 03, 2016, 04:58:07 PM »
Wolf management in this state? Now thats wishful thinking.

When Capitalists can't sell you something, they will work hard to improve it.  When a Socialist can't sell you something they create a law and force you to buy it anyway!

Clearly road kill is the only method of state wolf management which is already in progress.

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: Wolves, a good thing?
« Reply #127 on: June 03, 2016, 05:51:04 PM »
My definition of "End Hunting": There is no longer any reasonable hunting opportunity available and this condition is expected to persist for the foreseeable future.  Game populations are so sparse that probability of harvest is nearly 0; the state has closed all seasons or no longer sells tags.

What is not "End Hunting": Shorter seasons, additional harvest restrictions (like stopping antlerless harvest), reduced harvest numbers from historic highs, reduced success rates.  While these are not desirable, they are a far cry from End Hunting.

Lets stop the exaggerated bs.  Just because the tree huggers do it doesn't mean we should.  Lets keep our credibility with the 80% of non-hunting voters in this country.

 Perfect, so I don't believe there is anybody on this site that truly believes wolves will "end hunting" :dunno: , however there is no doubt that wolves will result in shorter seasons, additional harvest restrictions, reduced harvest numbers and reduce success rates.



Wolves could help bring an end to hunting if the already abysmal success rates drop lower, new hunter recruitment will drop even lower, hunters' small voice will grow quiet.  Hunting could very will be killed by voters and decrease opportunity.


Hopefully we'll add hunting rights to the states constitution to help combat this.

Offline WAPatriot

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 596
  • Location: west side(dark side)
  • its not the arrow its the indian
Re: Wolves, a good thing?
« Reply #128 on: June 03, 2016, 06:45:42 PM »
Are Mosquitos good what about Ebola. Wolves are the worst

Offline ribka

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 5647
  • Location: E side
  • That's what she said
Re: Wolves, a good thing?
« Reply #129 on: June 03, 2016, 06:52:20 PM »
A reasonable and logical person knows that over the past 30 years hunting seasons and opportunities are shrinking in almost all western states and in the mid west . There is indisputable evidence nowthat the introduction of wolves willgreatly hasten this process.

Can wolves be managed by hunting? Absolutely not

Can wolves be managed by Ariel shooting? No again

Can wolves be successfully managed by trapping and poisoning?  Yes

Are these two methods allowed to manage wolves in most states, no these methods are outlawed by clueless urban voters

So can wolves be successfully managed in WA and OR if numbers increase? Nope

Will sportsmen be adversely impacted? Without a doubt

If one is lucky enough in the future to draw a deer or elk  tag everyb8 to 10 years then hunting still exists and we should be grateful we can still hunt

I understand your logic now
« Last Edit: June 03, 2016, 07:02:30 PM by ribka »

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32890
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Wolves, a good thing?
« Reply #130 on: June 03, 2016, 09:33:18 PM »
And, won't most on here agree that wolves are then a bad thing?

I don't see how anyone can claim that wolves in this state are a "good thing"?  We all should be aware that management of wolves in this state will basically be/is non-existent.

 They are being managed, SSS!

I get it, breaking the law is cool if it's not a 400" bull or a 190" buck... Wow

 I didn't say I condoned it did I, I simply stated they are being managed..........have another drink.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline 257 Wby Mag

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1975
  • Location: Chehalis
Re: Wolves, a good thing?
« Reply #131 on: June 03, 2016, 10:50:10 PM »
I wish I had some makers!! You feverishly run your yap about other poaching, yet when it comes to sss and wolf management , you come across like "it's alright"...  You're doing great ol wise one...
Tod Riechert fan club.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32890
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Wolves, a good thing?
« Reply #132 on: June 03, 2016, 11:07:22 PM »
You feverishly run your yap about other poaching

 Ah, you've finally admitted the truth of Tods hunting exploits, Makers all around indeed! :brew:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline 257 Wby Mag

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1975
  • Location: Chehalis
Re: Wolves, a good thing?
« Reply #133 on: June 03, 2016, 11:32:02 PM »
Like always you've got lots of other threads to give your 2 cents on, congrats??
Tod Riechert fan club.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32890
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Wolves, a good thing?
« Reply #134 on: June 03, 2016, 11:33:19 PM »
Like always you've got lots of other threads to give your 2 cents on, congrats??

  :brew:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

New York deer by JDArms1240
[Today at 07:26:59 PM]


WDFW's new ship by MADMAX
[Today at 07:22:49 PM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by MADMAX
[Today at 06:28:52 PM]


Halibut fishing by hiway_99
[Today at 05:48:13 PM]


Fawn dropped by buckcanyonlodge
[Today at 05:43:09 PM]


Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle by Sneaky
[Today at 04:41:08 PM]


Cougar Problems Turoda Creek Road Near Bodie by MADMAX
[Today at 04:02:10 PM]


Resetting dash warning lights by HikerHunter
[Today at 02:34:14 PM]


KIFARU packs on sale by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 02:30:41 PM]


DIY Ucluelet trip by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 08:48:54 AM]


Alaska Fishing Guide and Lodge Recommendations by CaNINE
[Today at 04:14:32 AM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Yesterday at 10:02:50 PM]


Survey in ? by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:35:57 PM]


Colorado Results by cem3434
[Yesterday at 08:35:51 PM]


NEED ADVICE: LATE after JUNE 15th IDAHO BEAR by Sliverslinger
[Yesterday at 08:31:23 PM]


What's flatbed pickup life like? by Special T
[Yesterday at 05:52:28 PM]


Oregon spring bear by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 04:58:27 PM]


Idaho General Season Going to Draw for Nonresidents by idahohuntr
[Yesterday at 01:51:40 PM]


Seekins PH2 & Element sale by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Yesterday at 12:40:26 PM]


Kokanee Fishing Tournament!! 🎣 June 13-14, Joseph OR by WRKG4GD
[Yesterday at 11:42:02 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal