collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: tribes "closing" skok  (Read 15812 times)

Offline birddogdad

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 2022
  • Location: WA
  • Groups: LMAC, NRA
tribes "closing" skok
« on: June 02, 2016, 08:02:05 AM »
exercising boundaries to shut down skok looks like downstream from 101 this year. This could get interesting :bash:
USN retired
1981-2011

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14576
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2016, 08:41:55 AM »
I read one place that the state used to acknowledge it as tribal land.  During that time the tribe sold access passes to anglers.  Then the state and the tribe had some agreement and anglers had access without tribal approval.  Now the tribe wants it back as when they sold passes.  Should be a can of worms if it hits the courts.

Offline birddogdad

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 2022
  • Location: WA
  • Groups: LMAC, NRA
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2016, 08:49:56 AM »
I read one place that the state used to acknowledge it as tribal land.  During that time the tribe sold access passes to anglers.  Then the state and the tribe had some agreement and anglers had access without tribal approval.  Now the tribe wants it back as when they sold passes.  Should be a can of worms if it hits the courts.

http://www.kitsapsun.com/outdoors/tribe-blocks-salmon-fishing-on-skokomish-river-343d4919-4c41-4369-e053-0100007fb9f0-381592681.html

this is a can of worms, hoh? quil? solduc? hump? where will this end?
USN retired
1981-2011

Offline bearmanric

  • RIP Colockumelk
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4183
  • Location: Tenino Wa
  • Tenino Wa
    • Rick Robbins  rrcalls
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #3 on: June 02, 2016, 09:22:26 AM »
Cant fish Lake Quinalt any more either.  Rick
RIP Colockumelk
Facebook rrcalls no website.

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #4 on: June 02, 2016, 09:34:36 AM »
What has always baffled me is, aren't the majority of the fish they are claiming as theirs, fish from a washington state hatchery?

Offline twolabs

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 85
  • Location: Bremerton,WA
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #5 on: June 03, 2016, 07:14:25 AM »
The state should shut down the hatchery if they don't want to share the fish. They will net it until the fish are gone.

Offline chester

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1783
  • Location: Western WA
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2016, 07:31:01 AM »
What has always baffled me is, aren't the majority of the fish they are claiming as theirs, fish from a washington state hatchery?
Tacoma power just built two new ones for them as part of an agreement to keep the dams running.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Dilligaf

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2016, 08:02:27 AM »
What has always baffled me is, aren't the majority of the fish they are claiming as theirs, fish from a washington state hatchery?
Tacoma power just built two new ones for them as part of an agreement to keep the dams running.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Right, which my understanding is those will be tribal hatcheries

Offline chester

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1783
  • Location: Western WA
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #8 on: June 03, 2016, 08:10:59 AM »
Correct, so if they control the river to the point the state quits stocking it they have a couple more years of returns. They won't run out of fish.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dilligaf

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 16359
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #9 on: June 03, 2016, 08:32:25 AM »
 :bash:
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline PlateauNDN

  • Y.A.R. Medicine Man
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 10691
  • Location: God's Country
  • R.I.P. Colockumelk 20130423. Semper Fi!
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #10 on: June 03, 2016, 08:55:40 AM »
Correct, so if they control the river to the point the state quits stocking it they have a couple more years of returns. They won't run out of fish.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The state doesn't run all the hatcheries so that would only work in certain runs/rivers/tributaries.  Those that operate their own wouldn't be affected.
If you can read thank a teacher, If you can read in English thank a Marine! 
Not as Lean, Just as Mean, Still a Marine!
He who shed blood with me shall forever be my brother!

"Around this camp, there's only one Chief; the rest are Indians!"

"Give me 15 more minutes, I was dreaming of Beavers!"

Offline chester

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1783
  • Location: Western WA
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #11 on: June 03, 2016, 08:56:39 AM »
Correct, so if they control the river to the point the state quits stocking it they have a couple more years of returns. They won't run out of fish.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The state doesn't run all the hatcheries so that would only work in certain runs/rivers/tributaries.  Those that operate their own wouldn't be affected.
You are correct, we are talking about the skok specifically.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dilligaf

Online Badhabit

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 1241
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #12 on: June 03, 2016, 09:17:55 AM »
Pardon my ignorance on the Tribal boundaries on the Skok. Here's my question, if the Skok has navigable water/river how can the tribe(s) close of travel on the river? I understand that if your anchor or let your fishing weight hit the bottom of the river it would be trespassing but as long as your not making contact with the terra firma they can't stop you. Is this the situation on the Skok?

Offline chester

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1783
  • Location: Western WA
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #13 on: June 03, 2016, 09:21:11 AM »
I believe it's bordered by the river . Other side is private parcels and state ground. If I understood it how it was written they are claiming the water too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dilligaf

Online Badhabit

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 1241
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #14 on: June 03, 2016, 09:26:52 AM »
I recall the Yakamas had a similar claim to the Yakima River within their reservation boundaries claiming the rights to the high water mark on the other side of the river. The WDFW and the Yakamas worked something out not sure what arguments were used by both sides to resolve it but I believe it was resolved in a way that both sides were happy.

Online MADMAX

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 10542
  • Location: Kitsap/Cle Elum
  • I like big bucks and I can not lie
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #15 on: June 03, 2016, 09:30:20 AM »
its too bad to lose such a quality opportunity
sarcasm font applied
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Mark Twain


I Ain't Captain Walker.
I'm The Guy Who Carries Mr. Dead In His Pocket


What would life be without the thrill of the hunt ?

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14576
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #16 on: June 03, 2016, 09:38:00 AM »
its too bad to lose such a quality opportunity
sarcasm font applied
But it was contained in a certain area.  Now everyone is going to have to go elsewhere and crowd in on the places that are still open. No skok or Puyallup, this year--guess everyone will go to the Quilcene for the coho (unless there's something shinier closer by).

Online MADMAX

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 10542
  • Location: Kitsap/Cle Elum
  • I like big bucks and I can not lie
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #17 on: June 03, 2016, 09:56:09 AM »
yes another "quality" fishery
Maybe even chum at hoodsport later in the fall, or the Puyallup ?
too bad
the whole thing needs to be re-looked at (please Mr Trump ), Tribes with casinos dont need subsistence fisheries IMO.
If its shutdown let them all go through spawn ( no nets) and start a new cycle in quality fisheries, does anyone recall the puget sound blackmouth enhancement $$ , another stellar example of these various fisheries council needs to get some help to do it right
rant over
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Mark Twain


I Ain't Captain Walker.
I'm The Guy Who Carries Mr. Dead In His Pocket


What would life be without the thrill of the hunt ?

Offline DIYARCHERYJUNKIE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 3106
  • Location: hoodcanal
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #18 on: June 03, 2016, 10:22:49 AM »
Love how the article condemns the recreational people fishing for Sport.  Redistribution of the land and wealth in this country to take away from Americans wholesome family values.  We as Americans should feel bad for things all cultures do and have done for thousands of years, Care about there own people.  A lot of the  Skok Indians ive met personally are a very ruthless group of meth addicts and thieves.  You can see from the condition of the homes on the reservation that drugs and alcohol are VERY prevalent in the community.  I also know first hand that this is true from living nearby and spending lots of time at the river and in and around the community.  The condition of the properties goes the same for most all reservations I've ever seen.  Don't fall for the false hope of globalism. 

« Last Edit: June 03, 2016, 12:56:31 PM by jackelope »

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15145
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #19 on: June 03, 2016, 02:10:39 PM »
Tribes with casinos dont need subsistence fisheries IMO.


sub·sist·ence
səbˈsistəns/Submit
noun
1.
the action or fact of maintaining or supporting oneself at a minimum level.
"the minimum income needed for subsistence"
synonyms:   maintenance, keep, upkeep, livelihood, room and board, board, nourishment, food
"the money needed for his subsistence"

This is what gets me, how is selling tons of fish (or just the eggs) subsistence?

Offline Dhoey07

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3346
  • Location: Parts Unknown
    • No Facebook for this guy
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #20 on: June 03, 2016, 03:12:13 PM »
Pardon my ignorance on the Tribal boundaries on the Skok. Here's my question, if the Skok has navigable water/river how can the tribe(s) close of travel on the river? I understand that if your anchor or let your fishing weight hit the bottom of the river it would be trespassing but as long as your not making contact with the terra firma they can't stop you. Is this the situation on the Skok?

If it's on Indian property then you are in a different nation all together, on water or land.  Unless the piece of river they are claiming is off of indian land  :dunno:

Offline chester

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1783
  • Location: Western WA
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #21 on: June 03, 2016, 04:15:03 PM »
Pardon my ignorance on the Tribal boundaries on the Skok. Here's my question, if the Skok has navigable water/river how can the tribe(s) close of travel on the river? I understand that if your anchor or let your fishing weight hit the bottom of the river it would be trespassing but as long as your not making contact with the terra firma they can't stop you. Is this the situation on the Skok?

If it's on Indian property then you are in a different nation all together, on water or land.  Unless the piece of river they are claiming is off of indian land  :dunno:

That would be the issue . They are claiming water rights and anything in it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dilligaf

Online Badhabit

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 1241
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #22 on: June 03, 2016, 05:04:15 PM »
This is a must read article from the Dept of Interior dated Jan 15 2016.

https://solicitor.doi.gov/opinions/M-37034.pdf

Offline chester

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1783
  • Location: Western WA
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #23 on: June 03, 2016, 06:51:46 PM »
This is a must read article from the Dept of Interior dated Jan 15 2016.

https://solicitor.doi.gov/opinions/M-37034.pdf

Sounds like sport fishing is done on the skok.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dilligaf

Offline Roundhead

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5376
  • Location: Pierce County
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #24 on: June 03, 2016, 10:13:42 PM »
I read one place that the state used to acknowledge it as tribal land.  During that time the tribe sold access passes to anglers.  Then the state and the tribe had some agreement and anglers had access without tribal approval.  Now the tribe wants it back as when they sold passes.  Should be a can of worms if it hits the courts.
Indian Giving?

Offline chester

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1783
  • Location: Western WA
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #25 on: June 03, 2016, 10:14:09 PM »
:chuckle:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dilligaf

Offline haus

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 1049
  • Location: KITCO
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #26 on: June 03, 2016, 10:46:42 PM »
Well now the Skok river wont eat up a full page in fishing regs, saves on paper, very green move by the tribe. Just doing their part to stop global warming.
RMEF

Offline Duckslayer89

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 4098
  • Location: Cut Bank, Montana
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #27 on: June 04, 2016, 01:01:12 AM »
Well now the Skok river wont eat up a full page in fishing regs, saves on paper, very green move by the tribe. Just doing their part to stop global warming.

 :chuckle:

Offline PolarBear

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 10461
  • Location: Tatooine
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #28 on: June 04, 2016, 02:47:34 AM »
They can have it right after the state closes the Purdy Creek Hatchery!  Within a few years there will not be a salmon in that whole system.

Offline chester

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1783
  • Location: Western WA
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #29 on: June 04, 2016, 02:54:05 AM »
They have their own hatchery that was just completed at the Kokanee dam. I don't think they are too worried.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dilligaf

Offline haus

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 1049
  • Location: KITCO
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #30 on: June 04, 2016, 07:44:36 AM »
They can have it right after the state closes the Purdy Creek Hatchery!  Within a few years there will not be a salmon in that whole system.
There will be, don't associate their desire to acquire our half of the quota with a take em all till they're all gone harvest strategy. While our non-tribal "tribe" of fisheries managers is all in on the anti-hatchery because hatchery fish are evil crusade. The Indian tribes certainly aren't of the same view. Considering they've already increased their hatchery capacity in the system any reduction on our end does nothing, but directly increase their market share.

This is business pure and simple. The whole anti-hatchery movement from our non-tribal tribe is an open door to the Indian tribes and they're certainly grabbing the bull by the horns, tactically and skillfully increasing their share and influence over the salmon industry with every move they make.
RMEF

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14576
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #31 on: June 04, 2016, 08:37:00 AM »
They can have it right after the state closes the Purdy Creek Hatchery!  Within a few years there will not be a salmon in that whole system.
There will be, don't associate their desire to acquire our half of the quota with a take em all till they're all gone harvest strategy. While our non-tribal "tribe" of fisheries managers is all in on the anti-hatchery because hatchery fish are evil crusade. The Indian tribes certainly aren't of the same view. Considering they've already increased their hatchery capacity in the system any reduction on our end does nothing, but directly increase their market share.

This is business pure and simple. The whole anti-hatchery movement from our non-tribal tribe is an open door to the Indian tribes and they're certainly grabbing the bull by the horns, tactically and skillfully increasing their share and influence over the salmon industry with every move they make.
:yeah:  When the resource is co-managed the various tribes (imo) don't do a good job or have a good image--mostly due to being fed up with WDFW.  Seems like they just go along with the state to not step on toes.  But once they get full control, it seems like they go to a different mindset.  The ones that come to mind are the Makah and the Quinault.  They have rivers on their reservations that are revenue generators for them and the fishing is quite a bit different than the shared rivers. 

Online HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6565
  • Location: Toledo
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #32 on: June 04, 2016, 08:47:24 AM »
They have their own hatchery that was just completed at the Kokanee dam. I don't think they are too worried.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How does that affect the Skok?

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14576
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #33 on: June 04, 2016, 09:00:57 AM »
they could release directly into the NF or truck smolts up the SF.

Online HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6565
  • Location: Toledo
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #34 on: June 05, 2016, 07:19:19 AM »
Ya, I wasn't thinking about that too much when I replied. I was just visioning the hatchery at Potlatch for some reason. I work for Tacoma Power and have seen some info on the hatcheries. I'll have to look into them a little more.

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #35 on: June 05, 2016, 08:40:42 AM »
In another 30 years this state's fishing will be terrible.  Better start thinking about retiring in Oregon or near British Columbia.
275 down 2

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14576
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #36 on: June 05, 2016, 08:58:25 AM »
In another 30 years this state's fishing will be terrible.  Better start thinking about retiring in Oregon or near British Columbia.
With all the people moving to Oregon I don't know if it will hold out much longer either.  Not as bad as Washington is getting, but they're on the same road it seems.

Offline snake

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 763
  • Location: Washington
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #37 on: June 05, 2016, 01:05:15 PM »
Just another kick in the balls for WA Sportsmen.  We are losing opportunity all over the state every year, little by little.  We never get it back either.  Closing roads and Rivers... What a joke.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2016, 02:30:22 PM by Russ McDonald »

Offline Russ McDonald

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 8211
  • Location: Enumclaw
  • USN ET3 SW 87-92, USS Excel MSO 439
  • Groups: NWTF, NRA
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #38 on: June 05, 2016, 02:32:21 PM »
Fair warning there is not to be any getting around any profanity either by hyphinating or adding numbers to substitute letters.  Please keep the language clean. Thank you.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
« Last Edit: June 05, 2016, 06:09:25 PM by Russ McDonald »
Russell McDonald
President South Sound NWTF Chapter

Offline snake

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 763
  • Location: Washington
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #39 on: June 05, 2016, 05:55:10 PM »
can we cuss when Hilary Clinton gets elected?

Offline DIYARCHERYJUNKIE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 3106
  • Location: hoodcanal
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #40 on: June 05, 2016, 06:07:51 PM »
Ha!  She ain't getting elected. Maybe charges pressed against her.  :chuckle:

Offline snake

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 763
  • Location: Washington
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #41 on: June 05, 2016, 07:53:51 PM »
I hope she doesn't, but i'm afraid she will.  She will be 10 times worse than Obama.  ANYWAY... I believe closing the skok will have a big impact on the area.  The see the Hatchery being sold to the tribe in the future.

Online HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6565
  • Location: Toledo
Re: tribes "closing" skok
« Reply #42 on: June 05, 2016, 08:28:32 PM »
I hope she doesn't, but i'm afraid she will.  She will be 10 times worse than Obama.  ANYWAY... I believe closing the skok will have a big impact on the area.  The see the Hatchery being sold to the tribe in the future.

Hadnt thought about that. But wouldn't surprise me. Still think that was the hidden agenda of why the WDFW chose the Gene banks that they did!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Favorite Elk Broadhead by luvmystang67
[Today at 03:07:11 PM]


WSTA Fur Sale 2026 by redi
[Today at 03:05:49 PM]


WA 2nd Bear Tag. Is it still a thing? by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 02:38:55 PM]


Tenkara by Stein
[Today at 02:27:21 PM]


Help me decide Sig rangefinder questions. by 2MANY
[Today at 01:39:39 PM]


Offseason blues by rainshadow1
[Today at 01:31:56 PM]


Curvy Damascus Utility Fighter by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 11:35:32 AM]


First Time Home Buyers Class by pianoman9701
[Today at 10:37:20 AM]


Spring bear 2026 by Machias
[Today at 09:33:56 AM]


Arrow preference by boneaddict
[Today at 09:10:12 AM]


Muzzleloader Supplies by bb76
[Today at 08:49:55 AM]


Hey Turkey Killer's! by Tree Killer
[Today at 08:17:17 AM]


Initial Ascent packs made in Taiwan? by JPhelps
[Today at 05:46:04 AM]


Report Fisher sightings here by HillHound
[Yesterday at 08:55:59 PM]


Fuel transfer pump by Ridgeratt
[Yesterday at 04:34:53 PM]


It was a great year by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 03:45:59 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal