Free: Contests & Raffles.
its too bad to lose such a quality opportunitysarcasm font applied
Tribes with casinos dont need subsistence fisheries IMO.
Pardon my ignorance on the Tribal boundaries on the Skok. Here's my question, if the Skok has navigable water/river how can the tribe(s) close of travel on the river? I understand that if your anchor or let your fishing weight hit the bottom of the river it would be trespassing but as long as your not making contact with the terra firma they can't stop you. Is this the situation on the Skok?
Quote from: Badhabit on June 03, 2016, 09:17:55 AMPardon my ignorance on the Tribal boundaries on the Skok. Here's my question, if the Skok has navigable water/river how can the tribe(s) close of travel on the river? I understand that if your anchor or let your fishing weight hit the bottom of the river it would be trespassing but as long as your not making contact with the terra firma they can't stop you. Is this the situation on the Skok?If it's on Indian property then you are in a different nation all together, on water or land. Unless the piece of river they are claiming is off of indian land
This is a must read article from the Dept of Interior dated Jan 15 2016.https://solicitor.doi.gov/opinions/M-37034.pdf
I read one place that the state used to acknowledge it as tribal land. During that time the tribe sold access passes to anglers. Then the state and the tribe had some agreement and anglers had access without tribal approval. Now the tribe wants it back as when they sold passes. Should be a can of worms if it hits the courts.
Well now the Skok river wont eat up a full page in fishing regs, saves on paper, very green move by the tribe. Just doing their part to stop global warming.