State reports a new wolf pack, located near Sherman Pass

[Ridgeratt]

State reports a new wolf pack, located near Sherman Pass

The pack roams in the vicinity of Sherman Pass in Ferry County, north of the Colville Indian Reservation.
 
SPOKANE, Wash. -
The state has a new wolf pack, the 19th since the animals began returning to Washington in the 1990s.
   
State wildlife managers say part of a north central Washington wolf pack has split away and formed a new group called the Sherman Pack.
   
State wolf program manager Danny Martorello says the pack roams in the vicinity of Sherman Pass in Ferry County, north of the Colville Indian Reservation.
   
The Spokesman-Review reports that at the end of 2015, the state was home to at least 90 wolves and eight breeding pairs.
   
Wolves were shot, poisoned and trapped nearly to extinction in the state in the 1920s and 1930s. Wolves began returning in the state from nearby states and Canada in the 1990s, sometimes causing conflict with ranchers.
   
___
   
Information from: The Spokesman-Review,


http://www.khq.com/story/32242763/state-reports-a-new-wolf-pack-located-near-sherman-pass

[Miles]

Only took 8 years for the experts to figure that one out...

There's an all black one and your run of the mill gray one that have been all over there for years.  I've seen the gray one through the rifle scope and quickly realized I wasn't looking at a coyote.

[wolfbait]

"The state has a new wolf pack, the 19th since the animals began returning to Washington in the 1990s."

WDFW have been working at Blinding speed……..

[Ridgeratt]

I would guess these are the same batch that Campmeat has photos of in the last posts on this thread:

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,79244.msg2576611.html#new

[Special T]

So it would appear the state is not overly intersted in finding wolves south of I 90 so that we can get documented packs in each area.

[bobcat]

For the WDFW critics, the fact that they're saying there's a new pack doesn't mean they didn't already know there were wolves in the area. It just means they didn't have proof there was a "pack."

[Bango skank]

For the WDFW critics, the fact that they're saying there's a new pack doesn't mean they didn't already know there were wolves in the area. It just means they didn't have proof there was a "pack."

Doesnt take a genius to go up there and find difinitive evidence.  Theyre raising hell up there.  Still plenty of unconfirmed packs in the tri county area that wdfw will drag their feet on as long as possible

[bobcat]

What is evidence of a pack, by their definition?

[Bob33]

What is evidence of a pack, by their definition?

"A pack is defined as two or more wolves traveling together in winter and a breeding pair is defined as at least one adult male and one adult female wolf that raised at least two pups that survived until December 31."

[Miles]

Oh, I get it, we're playing the word game.... Excellent tactic.

[bobcat]

It's funny, no matter what they do or say, regarding wolves, people criticize the WDFW.

It takes more than going for a walk in the woods to come up with enough evidence of a wolf pack, that meets their scientific criteria.

They have never denied that wolves are present in the Sherman Pass area.

Oh, and by the way, the WDFW didn't bring wolves to this state in the first place, as I know many of you believe.

[Bango skank]

It's funny, no matter what they do or say, regarding wolves, people criticize the WDFW.

It takes more than going for a walk in the woods to come up with enough evidence of a wolf pack, that meets their scientific criteria.

No, a walk in the woods is literally all it takes.  If going for a walk and finding dead moose, wolf tracks and wolf crap all over the place and hearing them howl around you isnt difinitive enough to meet their criteria then they need to change their criteria.  The reason they have such stupid standards for what constitutes proof of a pack is to help them drag out the mess thats gonna happen when they confirm enough wolves to meet their delisting criteria

[bobcat]

I don't believe they need to find anymore wolves in the Northeast. I think to get wolves delisted they need to find wolves in the other regions first.

[WAPatriot]

It's funny, no matter what they do or say, regarding wolves, people criticize the WDFW.

It takes more than going for a walk in the woods to come up with enough evidence of a wolf pack, that meets their scientific criteria.

No, a walk in the woods is literally all it takes.  If going for a walk and finding dead moose, wolf tracks and wolf crap all over the place and hearing them howl around you isnt difinitive enough to meet their criteria then they need to change their criteria.  The reason they have such stupid standards for what constitutes proof of a pack is to help them drag out the mess thats gonna happen when they confirm enough wolves
to meet their delisting criteria

LOL

[bobcat]

Well I'd say it's pretty obvious why some of you aren't wildlife biologists.