Free: Contests & Raffles.
Yeah those damn accountants
Quote from: woodswalker on February 11, 2009, 07:31:40 AMQuote from: WAPITIHUNTER on February 10, 2009, 07:45:54 PMThe 30-338 is essentially the .300 win. mag.Uhm No...its actually an analog for the 308 Norma Mag...only reason that the 300WM is longer is that Norma beat Winchester to it. So Winchester stretched the 300WM to get it closer to the bigger 300s. In fact you use the 300 NM loading data for the 30-338. Um, not quite. 30-338 isnt exactly the same as a 308 Norma mag but close. I have a Norma . The cases are close but not the same, the norma is 2.559 long and the 30-338 is 2.500 long. None of the case measurements are the same except the caliber. 30-338 is a little hotter too.
Quote from: WAPITIHUNTER on February 10, 2009, 07:45:54 PMThe 30-338 is essentially the .300 win. mag.Uhm No...its actually an analog for the 308 Norma Mag...only reason that the 300WM is longer is that Norma beat Winchester to it. So Winchester stretched the 300WM to get it closer to the bigger 300s. In fact you use the 300 NM loading data for the 30-338.
The 30-338 is essentially the .300 win. mag.
why would you put a 1000.00 dollar scope on a 500 dollar gun go with the weaterby you might as well go all the way.
an Alaskan TI for $500??
I agree .300 win mag, why pay all the extra for the gun and the shells the differences between the .300 wm and .300 weatherby aren't enough to warrant the extra cost. Now i your talking the .30-.378 that's a different story, but if you've ever been around one you'll know even when out hunting you can't shoot that gun more than 2-3 times without it having some serious effect on your hearing. They also blow a great big whole through whatever they hit ruining a lot of meat.
I have seen that the magnums can make up for a poorly placed shot.