collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wireless Trail Camera  (Read 13520 times)

Offline Machias

  • Trapper
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 18989
  • Location: Worley, ID
Re: Wireless Trail Camera
« Reply #30 on: February 24, 2017, 08:29:06 PM »
 :tup:
Fred Moyer

When it's Grim, be the GRIM REAPER!

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: Wireless Trail Camera
« Reply #31 on: February 24, 2017, 08:33:44 PM »
Again....first one sent from camera, second one downloaded from SD card.  Night picture so not as easy to see the difference.
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: Wireless Trail Camera
« Reply #32 on: February 24, 2017, 08:54:35 PM »
Again, first sent from camera and second downloaded from SD card.  This right at daybreak, thus the greyish tone.  The sharpness is a little more evident in this comparison.
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

Offline luvmystang67

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 2300
  • Location: Coeur d'Alene
Re: Wireless Trail Camera
« Reply #33 on: February 27, 2017, 09:56:52 AM »
Wow thanks, that is pretty solid.

Do you have any examples where the ones sent look very bad?  Those look like good examples of photos, do you have any examples of bad ones?

Which cell company plan do you guys all have?  Did you do any research on other costs/plans?

Offline Machias

  • Trapper
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 18989
  • Location: Worley, ID
Re: Wireless Trail Camera
« Reply #34 on: February 27, 2017, 02:06:52 PM »
Wow thanks, that is pretty solid.

Do you have any examples where the ones sent look very bad?  Those look like good examples of photos, do you have any examples of bad ones?

Which cell company plan do you guys all have?  Did you do any research on other costs/plans?

They are not "bad" they are just a little grainier.  I'm with Verizon and GoWireless, at $8 a month I did not look for any alternative plans myself.  I'll try and post a couple of less than stellar photos tonight when I get home.
Fred Moyer

When it's Grim, be the GRIM REAPER!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

.45 kentucky rifle and patched roundballs by TitusFord
[Today at 09:05:39 AM]


49 DN Moose Success by washingtonmuley
[Today at 08:59:47 AM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by andrebeergog
[Today at 08:58:54 AM]


Lost a Trapping Legend by Machias
[Today at 08:28:43 AM]


Methow Wildlife Area Shooting Range by O. Nerka
[Today at 08:13:39 AM]


3 pintails by 2MANY
[Today at 07:57:41 AM]


Turnbull elk hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 06:56:26 AM]


Coupeville Highway pop-up blind by bhawley76
[Today at 06:19:03 AM]


Honor Mission - Billy Davis, 80, Navy Vet by ballpark
[Today at 05:59:32 AM]


WWF launches public campaign "Not my WDFW" to oust Director Susewind by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 07:45:15 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by tdot24
[Yesterday at 07:36:25 PM]


Steaming Euro Mounts by bugs n bones
[Yesterday at 07:27:39 PM]


Displaced Hunting Camps? by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 06:02:54 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by hunterednate
[Yesterday at 04:47:47 PM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by full choke
[Yesterday at 04:39:35 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by Turner89
[Yesterday at 10:20:20 AM]


What happened to the Cowlitz by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 08:59:33 AM]


Douglas 108 Moose tag by CJ1962
[Yesterday at 08:40:15 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal