collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: FPS question for handgun shooters  (Read 6107 times)

Offline jay.sharkbait

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 6482
Re: FPS question for handgun shooters
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2016, 08:33:37 PM »
I'm not "testing" ammo. I am reviewing someone else's testing and evaluating,  commenting about their results. If the FBI has published their standards for ammo performance then that would be the standard all self defense ammo would be measured by. I see no implication that i was looking for a more lethal ammo that preformed beyond the FBI parameters.

FFS the FBI should not be considered the benchmark for anything.


Offline mountainman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 6376
  • Location: Wenatchee, Wa
Re: FPS question for handgun shooters
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2016, 09:49:50 PM »
I'm not "testing" ammo. I am reviewing someone else's testing and evaluating,  commenting about their results. If the FBI has published their standards for ammo performance then that would be the standard all self defense ammo would be measured by. I see no implication that i was looking for a more lethal ammo that preformed beyond the FBI parameters.
no need to be paranoid.
That Sword is more important than the Shield!

Offline Badhabit

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 1241
Re: FPS question for handgun shooters
« Reply #17 on: November 15, 2016, 08:26:23 AM »
Hold on for a minute Mountainman I need to fold another tin foil hat.LOL

Offline fish vacuum

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 2227
Re: FPS question for handgun shooters
« Reply #18 on: November 15, 2016, 03:41:00 PM »


If I ever have too defend myself for whatever reason I'd hope that I have no pass through shots and have to be concerned about hurting someone with one. The chances of this happening are very remote but one less concern to process.

In a real life situation, it's very likely some shots will miss the target completely. Don't think that the right ammo will make it safe for anyone behind the bad guy.

Offline Mongo Hunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 855
  • Location: Vancouver
  • Pew Pew lifestyle
Re: FPS question for handgun shooters
« Reply #19 on: November 28, 2016, 10:41:48 AM »
I think over penetration is like printing, people overthink it.

Remember there was a time when a 4" .357 was the cats meow when it came to defense.

So a .380, 9mm, .40 or a .45 with a quality hollow point shouldn't over penetrate. if it does more than likely there wont be enough steam left in it to hurt anyone behind your target.

misses are a bigger concern than over penetration in my opinion. carry what your good a shooting and practice.

Also remember Ballistics Gel is NOT a representation of a human body. its only to give scientist, ammo manufactures, feds, ect a consistent medium to test ammo in. if you want something more consistent with a human body do a layer of denim, cotton, pig skin with some fat, pork ribs, some fruit or other semi porous material and then another layer of pork ribs. results can be surprising.
« Last Edit: November 28, 2016, 11:07:25 AM by Mongo Hunter »
Vegetarian: Old Indian word for Bad Hunter.

Offline luteai

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 129
  • Location: Spokane
Re: FPS question for handgun shooters
« Reply #20 on: December 03, 2016, 09:18:35 PM »
Deer and goats make good test subjects. :yike:
"Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to be happy" Ben Franklin

Offline Bofire

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 5524
  • Location: Yelm
  • Harley YAR YAR YAR!
Re: FPS question for handgun shooters
« Reply #21 on: December 05, 2016, 07:40:37 PM »
goats and sheep many were used by Msood Ayoob and  Ed Sanow in the book on one shot stops.
also the Govt used many in many arms and ammo tests
Carl
When the chips are down..... the buffalo is empty!!

I do not shop at Amazon

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Grouse hunting .22 pistol? by Wingin it
[Today at 04:49:49 AM]


me and my son headed east for our 2nd turkey season by shorthair15
[Yesterday at 10:52:59 PM]


How to edit title by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 10:33:22 PM]


Discretion !!! by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 10:23:25 PM]


Attention Sportsmen and Women: Presence needed at April WDFW Commission meeting by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 09:26:29 PM]


E tags by X-Force
[Yesterday at 08:12:35 PM]


2026 turkey season! by brewzer13
[Yesterday at 07:03:21 PM]


WA wolf population increases 17%. by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 05:41:12 PM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by time2hunt
[Yesterday at 05:28:33 PM]


Mushroom ID Thread by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 04:02:06 PM]


You Bear Slayers by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 03:10:33 PM]


WA 2nd Bear Tag. Is it still a thing? by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 03:01:45 PM]


6.5 PRC advice by bearhunter99
[Yesterday at 02:32:41 PM]


Blacktail Trophy Tactics Hunting Event: Free for Veterans/Active Duty by silverdalesauer
[Yesterday at 09:42:17 AM]


Looking for Your Help - Donate Used or New Gear by silverdalesauer
[Yesterday at 09:24:31 AM]


Old account recovery by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:08:24 AM]


Hoof rot by HikerHunter
[Yesterday at 08:23:42 AM]


Best Turkey Recipes by erronulvin
[Yesterday at 07:49:22 AM]


Any fans of the 35 Rem, 358 Win, 35 Whelen, 9.3x62, or 45-70? by The Big Game Hunter
[Yesterday at 06:00:15 AM]


Bear ID certification by Scruffy
[April 19, 2026, 11:37:29 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal