Vortex Question? Razor HD VS. Viper HD...both HD??

[mtn.goat]

I didn't really think I'd be seriously shopping for new glass anytime this decade or next.  But I've been looking at stepping up from my current HD Leupold gold ring 10x42's to a set of 12x or possibly staying with 10x.  Absolutely zero issues or complaints with my gold rings, clarity is spectacular etc., maybe a bit stout at nearly 34 ozs., so a weight savings may be nice.  I like the Vortex warranty and is a killer selling point for me but I'm open to Euro. options as I've seen some very fair prices (compared to new) on here from various members, demos or what I'm not sure.

1.  Why are the Razor HD basically double the in investment of the Viper HD?  Are they worth it and what makes such a substantial difference?  Matierials, polishing, euro glass or???

2.  How does the Razor line and, for that matter the Viper line compare to the Euro glass of the Swarovski and Leica variety?

Not only is this not my forte, but I truly haven't been staying up on glass as I've had no plan to upgrade.  My wife expressed a serious interest in my HD's so.....  I'm on the hunt. 

I much appreciate all your knowledge and foresight on this, in advance.... as well as, who have you bought from and been extremely pleased with, recommend buying from etc.

Redneck logic thus far..... (rough #'s).  Vipers - $600, Razors - $1200 (or 2 PR. of Vipers).  And honestly Swarovski and Leica similar screwy logic... ( 2 PR. of Razors for the same dough)   

[Bean Counter]

IMHO You should do some research on what goes into quality optics. Bak-4 > Bak-7 prisms, dielectric vs silver or aluminum coatings, collimation, etc.  That way you wont have buyers remorse when you finally drop some big coin on good glass. Honestly the place to do that isn't amongst hunters, its with bird watchers. Go to birdforum.net or a few others and just read. Hell, join and pretend to be an amatuer bird watcher 

Basically you'll get what you pay for, with few exceptions. I haven't looked through  the Razors but I've looked through the midrange stuff of Vortex and for the open country hunting I do I could never use it. It might be different if it were just an occasional glance but I look through my optics for 5-8 hours a day. I have high end Nikon optics myself and when I looked through another guys Vortex at the range next to mine it was night and day. All kinds of lateral color fringing (chromatic abberation) and the image just wasn't sharp by comparison. 

bean counter logic.. rough #'s. How much is one of your days worth and how much will quality optics leverage your hunting days? If my high end optics can help me tag out in 3-4 days in stead  of 5-7 and get back to family/work/other things much quicker then a few hundred or even $1,000+ is going to pay for itself in just a season or two. I save my money by shooting older weapons, driving older trucks, wearing older low end clothes, and drinking cheaper beer. There, did I make the cut for redneck finally? 

HTH

[Magnum_Willys]

I use viper hd 10x because they work and are light.  At times I ask buddy for his euro (cabelas) 12x to double check distant sightings. They weigh almost twice what the vipers do.   Weight or clarity ?   

[carlyoungs]

I have the vipers and they are ok. My buddy has the razors and they are better. I would go with the euro stuff. I see them on here for close to the same price as the razors at times. I have a euro scope on my rifle and total night and day difference.  I might sell my vipers and upgrade if I  see another good deal on some swaros. If you glass a lot with your binos get some European glass.

[Bob33]

Absolutely zero issues or complaints with my gold rings, clarity is spectacular etc.,

One might ask why you are looking if you believe your current bino is spectacular.

Everyone's eyes are different, and everyone uses binos differently. If you only glass occasionally and are happy with your Leupolds you might stay with them. Their warranty is equal to anyone's.

I personally prefer Swarovski and high end Nikon glass, but that's meaningless because your eyes may reach different conclusions. If you can, spend a few hours looking through various binoculars at dusk or nighttime and you will notice some differences.

I have a good friend with $300 Leupold binos who can't see any difference between them and $2K Swarovskis. They give me headaches after about 15 seconds.

[JDHasty]

Alpha binoculars also includes Nikon's EDG, of which I have a pair of 8x42 and they are very comfortable to spend the better part of my waking hours for an entire week behind.  We also have a Swaro 15x56 SLC Neu and spending all day every day for days on end behind that binocular is very comfortable. 

Anything above bargains are going to be dielectric coated and BAK 4 so although that is interesting knowledge to have, it isn't what is going to make the difference when deciding between two mid to high level binoculars. 

One thing I would do is educate myself on the "spinning globe" or "rolling ball effect" and how some people are affected with it and some are not.  If you are looking at binoculars in this price class some will have what are known as "field flattener" lenses in them and some will not.  If you are so effected then it does not make sense to purchase a binocular that has that feature when there are other options that will serve you better. 

I have spent a sum total of zero hours behind Razor binoculars and can't help ya out with what my impression of them is.  I do use a Viper 6x32 a LOT and like it very well, but that is a horse of a different color.  You really cannot extrapolate from my experience using that very low powered field binocular to one in the ten or above range. 

[JeffRaines]

Recently stepped up from Diamondbacks to Swaros. In doing so I looked through Vipers, Razors, Zeiss Conquests and Swaro SLC(what I purchased) and ELs.

My opinion - Once you get above middle of the road prices ($500~) Vortex really lags. The Vipers aren't $400 better than the Diamondbacks, and the Razors are not $600 better than the Vipers. Through the rest of the month you can find Swaros for only a couple hundred more than the Razors new, and they're worth every penny.

Alternatively, if you don't want to spend that much, I found the conquests to have better glass than the Razors and can be found for $800-900.

You can find demo Swaros for $1300~ which is the route I went. Still get the warranty, and these binos had everything and you couldn't tell they were ever handled.   

[BULLBLASTER]

Recently stepped up from Diamondbacks to Swaros. In doing so I looked through Vipers, Razors, Zeiss Conquests and Swaro SLC(what I purchased) and ELs.

My opinion - Once you get above middle of the road prices ($500~) Vortex really lags. The Vipers aren't $400 better than the Diamondbacks, and the Razors are not $600 better than the Vipers. Through the rest of the month you can find Swaros for only a couple hundred more than the Razors new, and they're worth every penny.

Alternatively, if you don't want to spend that much, I found the conquests to have better glass than the Razors and can be found for $800-900.

You can find demo Swaros for $1300~ which is the route I went. Still get the warranty, and these binos had everything and you couldn't tell they were ever handled.   

When I looked it was about the opposite for me. I saw huge improvements up to the razors, and just couldn't see the cost benefits of the swaro or Leica at that time.
Different eyes I guess

[Copperwood]

I haves pair of  2016 Viper HD in 10x50. I like them better than my leupolds but I didn't think they were as good as everyone has said. I bought a pair of the Swarovski EL 10x42 and I don't think they belong in the same category. Actually I would probably sell my vipers if you are interested. I didn't think the Razors were worth the extra money. Most of this is about preference. My buddy has a cheap $100 pair of bushnells and he thinks I'm an idiot for spending $2k on my ELs. Try out a bunch of them and see which you like better. Now with it getting dark so early, you could easily try them all out in low light situations at the store.

[thinkingman]

Recently stepped up from Diamondbacks to Swaros. In doing so I looked through Vipers, Razors, Zeiss Conquests and Swaro SLC(what I purchased) and ELs.

My opinion - Once you get above middle of the road prices ($500~) Vortex really lags. The Vipers aren't $400 better than the Diamondbacks, and the Razors are not $600 better than the Vipers. Through the rest of the month you can find Swaros for only a couple hundred more than the Razors new, and they're worth every penny.

Alternatively, if you don't want to spend that much, I found the conquests to have better glass than the Razors and can be found for $800-900.

You can find demo Swaros for $1300~ which is the route I went. Still get the warranty, and these binos had everything and you couldn't tell they were ever handled.   

I agree.
Conquest HDs can be had all day with a US warranty for $800 and that's an easy decision to make.

[JDHasty]

I haves pair of  2016 Viper HD in 10x50. I like them better than my leupolds but I didn't think they were as good as everyone has said. I bought a pair of the Swarovski EL 10x42 and I don't think they belong in the same category. Actually I would probably sell my vipers if you are interested. I didn't think the Razors were worth the extra money. Most of this is about preference. My buddy has a cheap $100 pair of bushnells and he thinks I'm an idiot for spending $2k on my ELs. Try out a bunch of them and see which you like better. Now with it getting dark so early, you could easily try them all out in low light situations at the store.

I know people who destroy everything they get their hands on and it doesn't make sense for such an individual to purchase heirloom quality anything.   If you take care of what you own I suspect that he is way off base thinking you are an idiot for spending $2K on a binocular.  I suspect that he is "projecting."  My guess is that he knows himself better than anyone and he knows that irrespective of what he gets his hands on it will be reduced to a pile of crap after the first month and in his case spending more than $100 on a binocular is poor economy.

I don't understand the motivation to destroy, but I don't have to understand it in order to accept it for what it is.   

[JeffRaines]

Recently stepped up from Diamondbacks to Swaros. In doing so I looked through Vipers, Razors, Zeiss Conquests and Swaro SLC(what I purchased) and ELs.

My opinion - Once you get above middle of the road prices ($500~) Vortex really lags. The Vipers aren't $400 better than the Diamondbacks, and the Razors are not $600 better than the Vipers. Through the rest of the month you can find Swaros for only a couple hundred more than the Razors new, and they're worth every penny.

Alternatively, if you don't want to spend that much, I found the conquests to have better glass than the Razors and can be found for $800-900.

You can find demo Swaros for $1300~ which is the route I went. Still get the warranty, and these binos had everything and you couldn't tell they were ever handled.   

When I looked it was about the opposite for me. I saw huge improvements up to the razors, and just couldn't see the cost benefits of the swaro or Leica at that time.
Different eyes I guess

I mean there were definite improvements, i just couldn't personally justify spending the coin they wanted on the improvements I seen. The way I explained it was looking through a nice pair of binoculars(viper), looking through a really nice pair(razor), and actually being there(swaros)

[BULLBLASTER]

  I could see enough improvement to justify the added cost of razor. But that jump to sharp wassnt there to me to just off the added cost. Had they been price they could be today I would have made the jump I think. 

[JeffRaines]

I could see enough improvement to justify the added cost of razor. But that jump to sharp wassnt there to me to just off the added cost. Had they been price they could be today I would have made the jump I think.

Yeah, had they not been on sale/demo I probably would've thought twice. I didn't think the ELs were worth the jump in price from the SLCs, either. Nice glass for sure, though.

[JDHasty]

I could see enough improvement to justify the added cost of razor. But that jump to sharp wassnt there to me to just off the added cost. Had they been price they could be today I would have made the jump I think.

Yeah, had they not been on sale/demo I probably would've thought twice. I didn't think the ELs were worth the jump in price from the SLCs, either. Nice glass for sure, though.

The EL vs SLC choice is exactly the scenario in which I posted this above:  One thing I would do is educate myself on the "spinning globe" or "rolling ball effect" and how some people are affected with it and some are not.  If you are looking at binoculars in this price class some will have what are known as "field flattener" lenses in them and some will not.  If you are so effected then it does not make sense to purchase a binocular that has that feature when there are other options that will serve you better. 

There are definitely people out there in which a lower cost SLC is going to perform better for than will the EL or another binocular such as the Nikon EDG that costs more.  Most, if not all, of the cost differential is due to the latter incorporating a "field flatterer" lens group that the former lacks.  If you are affected by "globe effect" then in "buying up" just because you want the best may actually leave you using an inferior choice for your situation.