collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: FFg or FFFG  (Read 7459 times)

Offline huntnfmly

  • Trade Count: (+36)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4733
FFg or FFFG
« on: February 12, 2009, 12:19:47 PM »
I am new to muzzleloading and wondering wich to use?FFg or FFFG I have a 50cal knight wolverine.Any info would be great.
I'm your dam tour guide Arnie please don’t wonder off the dam tour.
Take as many dam pictures as you want ....
Are there any dam questions ..

Offline MagKarl

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 460
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: FFg or FFFG
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2009, 01:18:21 PM »
Either should work.  You could always try both to see if your rifle has a preference.

Offline TopOfTheFoodChain

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 498
  • Location: Kelso
Re: FFg or FFFG
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2009, 08:37:59 PM »
Not saying it's better or worse, I use FFF

Offline Moose Eyes

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 427
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: FFg or FFFG
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2009, 08:58:47 PM »
Either should work.  You could always try both to see if your rifle has a preference.

Exactly.  Based on my most recent results I am going with 3F.  But I will keep tinkering. 
NRA
NAHC
Washington for Wildlife

Offline dawhunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 780
  • Location: Washougal, Wa.
Re: FFg or FFFG
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2009, 03:34:20 PM »
Is 100 grains of 3F the same as 100 grains of 2F isn't there a big differance in the two
as far as power ??
Bob
Bob

Offline MagKarl

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 460
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: FFg or FFFG
« Reply #5 on: February 19, 2009, 09:48:38 AM »
No, 3F is finer, so you get a greater powder density (less air) when measured by volume.  I can't remember offhand, but I want to say you need to cut 3F back by something like 15%, so ~85 grains of 3F would be roughly equal to 100 grains 2F. 

Offline dawhunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 780
  • Location: Washougal, Wa.
Re: FFg or FFFG
« Reply #6 on: February 20, 2009, 06:33:21 AM »
Thanks !! :hello:
Bob
Bob

Offline T-Bone

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 615
  • Location: Rockford, WA
Re: FFg or FFFG
« Reply #7 on: March 15, 2009, 03:26:23 PM »
In general, FFG for .50 caliber and above; FFFG for .45 caliber. You can raise pressure to a dangerous level by a directly substituting one for the other. :bdid:

READ THE DIRECTIONS THAT CAME WITH YOUR MUZZLELOADER! Also, order a catalog from Dixie Gunworks; LOTS of good info.; including powder and load recommendations for a wide variety of muzzleloaders.
" America will never be destroyed from outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves."

                                                      Abraham Lincoln

Offline sparksbr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 64
  • Location: Central Washington University
Re: FFg or FFFG
« Reply #8 on: March 25, 2009, 08:47:12 PM »
I have a Knight Bighorn .50 and have gleaned through all the Knight manuals.  I have found nothing related to this.  One would think an issue as major as excessive pressures would warrant more detailed manufacturer info. 

SCARY!!!

Here is a description of FFFG as taken from Hodgdon's website.

"The same great powder as FFG with smaller grain size and it is intended for use in pistols and rifles of 50 caliber and smaller."

Does the Dixie Gunworks catalog have more info related to grain size?


Offline Rob

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 4953
  • Location: Sandpoint ID
Re: FFg or FFFG
« Reply #9 on: April 14, 2009, 03:38:49 PM »
I am new to this, but in reading the Lyman Black Powder book, I seem to recall that the loads are measured volumetricaly, not by weight, and you should follow the powder/charge recommendations for your gun.  Mine (different make) says to use either FF or FFF, but recommends FFF but does not comment on using different volumetric amounts based on powder type that I saw, but I will re-read.

bottom line, I would follow your manual!
_______________________________________
Sit tall in the saddle, hold you head up high.
Keep your eyes fixed on where the trail meets the sky.
Live like you ain’t afraid to die.
Just sit back and enjoy your ride
  - Chris Ledoux

Offline T-Bone

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 615
  • Location: Rockford, WA
Re: FFg or FFFG
« Reply #10 on: April 15, 2009, 07:01:51 AM »
I have a Knight Bighorn .50 and have gleaned through all the Knight manuals.  I have found nothing related to this.  One would think an issue as major as excessive pressures would warrant more detailed manufacturer info. 

SCARY!!!

Here is a description of FFFG as taken from Hodgdon's website.

"The same great powder as FFG with smaller grain size and it is intended for use in pistols and rifles of 50 caliber and smaller."

Does the Dixie Gunworks catalog have more info related to grain size?

Yes, in the the POWDER section; also, for a GREAT Owner's Manual with good info., get one from Thompson Center. It has good general info. for all muzzleloaders.




" America will never be destroyed from outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves."

                                                      Abraham Lincoln

Offline sparksbr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 64
  • Location: Central Washington University
Re: FFg or FFFG
« Reply #11 on: April 27, 2009, 09:11:00 PM »
Thanks T-Bone, I'll definately check into it.

Brady

Offline jroc92980

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 53
  • Location: Kent, WA
Re: FFg or FFFG
« Reply #12 on: May 02, 2009, 02:14:13 AM »
I just bought a T/C Blackdiamond XR .50 and according to that manual FFG is used for .45 cal  to .58 cal and the FFFG is used for .45 cal and under.

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: FFg or FFFG
« Reply #13 on: May 18, 2009, 11:02:31 AM »
From what I have read is that 3F burns faster then 2F.  Which results in a higher pressure yuou would get from 3F then 2F. 
275 down 2

Offline Pat/Rick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 363
Re: FFg or FFFG
« Reply #14 on: May 18, 2009, 02:46:08 PM »
The finer the grain, the faster the burn.Either one will work with a fifty.If you go for large powder loads felt recoil will be more with finer powders.Measure by volume not weight.Start out around 60 or 70 grains of powder and then increase slowly,develop a load that works.When accuracy starts to fall off,cut your load back around 10 grains or so.You don't need to shoot humungous 100+ grain loads. Remember a 45-70 shot a 400 grain bullet pushed by 70 grains of powder. YMMV

Offline Moose Eyes

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 427
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: FFg or FFFG
« Reply #15 on: May 18, 2009, 08:34:57 PM »
The finer the grain, the faster the burn.Either one will work with a fifty.If you go for large powder loads felt recoil will be more with finer powders.Measure by volume not weight.Start out around 60 or 70 grains of powder and then increase slowly,develop a load that works.When accuracy starts to fall off,cut your load back around 10 grains or so.You don't need to shoot humungous 100+ grain loads. Remember a 45-70 shot a 400 grain bullet pushed by 70 grains of powder. YMMV

 :yeah:
NRA
NAHC
Washington for Wildlife

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

BNSF Land Access by HntnFsh
[Today at 06:45:39 AM]


Roosevelt Elk. Please nudge me in the right direction. I feel hopeless. by HntnFsh
[Today at 06:33:28 AM]


How is late season whitetail hunting? Good, bad, decent? GMU 105/117? by eddyr
[Today at 06:27:31 AM]


Slide Ridge Quality tag holders by Britt-dog
[Today at 06:09:06 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by jeffitz
[Today at 04:04:14 AM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 10:15:40 PM]


Stevens double barrel 410 by scotsman
[Yesterday at 09:39:58 PM]


Xlr element vs mdt hnt26 by dmoua
[Yesterday at 09:30:35 PM]


My Wenaha bull by clearwater
[Yesterday at 09:06:15 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 08:55:39 PM]


East Side Quail Numbers? by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 08:55:20 PM]


Hunting late season, where would you go? by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 07:43:16 PM]


Late Season archery elk by jason stevens
[Yesterday at 06:26:12 PM]


Upland bird carry options by GWP
[Yesterday at 05:28:01 PM]


3 pintails by hdshot
[Yesterday at 05:23:19 PM]


Game Warden Channel featuring my nephew on Nevada Wild by danderson
[Yesterday at 03:51:08 PM]


Hunting DNR Natural Area Preserves by avidnwoutdoorsman
[Yesterday at 03:26:14 PM]


Flynn’s Hunts!!! by Tafinder
[Yesterday at 12:37:35 PM]


Dash cams by jrebel
[Yesterday at 12:25:23 PM]


Mechanic help 4.0 ford by Woodchuck
[Yesterday at 11:50:39 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal